Home
Commentary
OPINIONS
Commentary
OPINIONS |
Report a comment Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site. Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report. Comment in question 17-05-2007 12:40 On the Democratic side, every presidential candidate running today who was in the Senate when the motion to authorize the use of force came up?Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Joe Biden and Chris Dodd?voted yes. Outside of government, the case for war was made not just by the neoconservative Weekly Standard but to select almost randomly the traditionally conservative National Review, the liberal New Republic and the center-right Economist. Of course, most neoconservatives supported the war, the case for which was also being made by journalists and scholars from every point on the political spectrum. Perhaps the most influential tome on behalf of war was written not by any conservative, let alone neoconservative, but by Kenneth Pollack, Clinton's top Near East official on the National Security Council. The title: The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq. Everyone has the right to renounce past views. But not to make up that past. It is beyond brazen to think that one can get away with inventing not ancient history but what everyone saw and read with their own eyes just a few years ago. Guest |
NewsletterTranslateMost E-mailed![]() |




