Home arrow Commentary
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
26-07-2007 13:42
Top scientists: warming man-made
According to top UK and US scientists, changes in solar irradiance CANNOT explain the marked global warming over the last 40 years.  
 
From the highly-respected UK New Scientist (11 July 2007), de-bunking the latest "greenhouse denial" campaign, QUOTE: Direct satellite measurements of solar activity show it has been declining since the mid-1980s and cannot account for recent rises in global temperatures, according to new research. 
 
The findings debunk an explanation for climate change that is often cited by people who are not convinced that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are causing the Earth's climate to warm." END QUOTE 
 
Again, readers of this thread must decide between a n overhwelming global scientific consensus (e.g. the IPCC, the US National Academy of Science,the US AAAS, the UK Royal Society, other national scientific bodies, Australia's CSIRO, outstanding individual scientist (NASA's Dr James Hansen, the UK Chief Scientist, major popular and technical Sceince journals such as Science, Nature and the generalist review journal New Scientist etc etc VERSUS  
the dangerous denial and obfuscation of anonymous bloggers as evidenced on this thread.  
 
If you were ill (e.g. in Australia, with affordable health services for everyone - unlike Bush Amerika [see SICKO] ) you would go to a General Practitioner doctor (6 years university training, several years hospital training,  
specialist GP training, and then possibly decades of further professional experience). Indeed you might then be referred to a specialist doctor (with another decade of specialist training in the area concerned e.g. a physician, surgeon, ophthalmologist, ENT, dermatologist, oncologist etc). 
If you don't like what you hear you can get a SECOND EXPERT OPINION. 
 
My brief list above amounts to millions of expert scientific opinions from highly trained scientists without vested financial interests (indeed quite the reverse) and subject to acute professional ethical constraint VERSUS the ignorant prejudices of an unknown anonymous blogger reflecting the corrupt, lying, human rights abusing, racist Bush Administration and its corporate friends.
Guest
 

Translate

Enter Amount: