Thank you Rosemarie, I have folowed this man for only a short time. He may be guilty of some of what they claim. But in his overall message of the exposure and painting of a the full picture I can not help far out weighs its blemishes. As I herd a famous black american writter exclaim while accepting his award for his writtings and answering questions from the audience, There is no doubt that the white man in his theft of North America stold the land, took it, from the american indian. Not only dose Churchills work expose this and bring it to light, he points to the fact as we gazed to west to achieve this destiny of wealth, done on the backs of another group of peoples of color (slaves). These actions were justified and made acceptable, to attempt a void in critisism, in the statements made behind the Manifest Destiny. We now, AS WE TURN OUR GAZE BACK TO THE EAST, continue with this same philosophy to another peoples of colored skin, drive to bring democracy and freedom to the east now in serch of still that precious comodity oil. Those who do not put on the blue coat or join his ranks will be systematically, purposefully and with intent, directly and then indirectly by their own manipulated by, and the covert and direct policies of the occupiers, all of them. How coincedental the main occupiers are the same as those who were invovved in much of the North American begginings, Great Britain, the Dutch and Settlers. Odds are against Chirchill as we see laws or edicts being passed weekly and monthly by the king that reek with old lubricants left overby slick Willy and his father, not to leave out except to be brief the crimes of their predisessors. Need I say more about the arrogance of the colonizing white man. Prejudice abounds in the other comments.

Guest