First of all this goes back to early 2005. When he wrote the essay htat referances 9/11. Iraq is not off the subject but rather to the heart of the matter of foriegn policy that he speaks of and what started his being targeted. As a historical writter it is not uncommon for foot notes and quotes to go amiss in large reasearched works. This country is steeped in coverups thru out its history. One is the credit the west likes to give to Regan getting credit for the collapse of the USSR and communism. Just as a small example. I have read a couple of his works and other debates on other sites. Our current war on terror is highly debateable as to the truths the Bush administration gave to go to war. If Ward Chuchill made some mistakes in his research, this dose not make him a criminal. How many times I have been in a class using a text the instructor has chosen to deviate from the author of the text. They have been calling for his head since that article , yet that article is not were the reasons for firing him are to be found, and yet they are. This is the crux of the matter. An article from his wife was published in Znet in defence fo his work and what he is being accused of. Any one wanting to ignore that politics is not playing a role in this isn\'t looking at the full picture. Writing and conclusions on social sciences are not always cut and dry, as in mathematics. As far as anyones university and what they would have happen at their school, are you on the board at your school. If so lay it out. Much of what Churchill is trying to expose is historical and some is philisophical. He would have had to have made some grave misrepresentations. His opinions and argument in regaurds to the World Trade Centers, are no more far vetched than teh ones given to take us to war start a new genocide and finish out a older genocide to take control and basically steal natural gas and oil thru domination in the middle east, which we have been doing since befor 9/11 and back as far at least to the Regan administration to be kind , as it goes farther than that.Contrary tothe publicized so called liberal media (liers that they are, bush is winning this war thru caos), as it allows us to stay but surrounding more lies of spreading democracy. Churchill is just sombody who pointed some of the B.S. that really called for (9/11 to happen). Multiple genocidal periods are encompassed in this whole debacle and US and corp. powers that be do not like these things drawn to the publics attention , especiallly when they are trying to get the publics attention to commit a genocide to steal peoples oil and need enlistments. None of my instructors were fired for changing paths, or presenting a less popular side of the story. So this is about more that some misdeeds on some paper work and publications.

Guest