Home
Commentary
Commentary |
Report a comment Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site. Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report. Comment in question 06-08-2007 02:21 Obama's WE WILL means FORCE Why do Bush-ites, neo-cons, pro-Zionists, global warming sceptics, Creationists etc etc have to get so PERSONAL and NASTY - and BLATANTLY INCORRECT with it? Thus #4 above asserts: "he [Obama] said IF we have ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE that there are HIGH-VALUE AL Qaida targets in Pakistan and president Musharraf will NOT act, WE WILL. How does that mean 'Strike Pakistan’?" What else does "we will" mean other than "act violently" in this context? I am quite sure that of those - right, left and centre - aware of Obama's "we will" out of 160 million Pakistanis, an overhwelming majority (from the Pakistani Foreign Minister to the demonstrators in the streets) are all too well aware of what "we will" means (even though English is not their primary language"). Ditto George W. Bush (although his English aint so good). And ditto the UK Guardian (where they really DO know their English) which today [6 August 2007] says "Threatening an unstable Pakistan with force isn't a prudent move for a would-be president". |
TranslateMost E-mailed![]() In Pictures |



