Home arrow Commentary
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
07-08-2007 00:02
Quote:
 
Now, this means we will go after the terrorist ourselves. It doesn't mean we will attack or strike or invade or bomb or take military action against Pakistan as a nation.

 
 
Are you kidding me? How else would you go after the terrorists assuming that Pakistan would not cooperate and most certainly Pakistani government would not allow US forces inside their border. (they rejected this idea from the start) 
 
This discussion is not about Pakistan being a genuine ally of the US or not. 
 
It is about a mind set (you say 70% of Americans) which they do not want to take any responsibility for their conduct in past 50 years or so and it is about a prominent US politician who is defying the international laws even before becoming a president. 
 
What about the option that if US had a credible evidence on whereabouts of terrorists in any state, and the government of that state would refuse to deal with them according to the international laws and treaties, then US representative would take this matter to UN? 
 
But that would be too unpopular among American public and will not generate any support or rating of opinion polls. Am I right?
Shahram
 

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar