Home
Commentary
Commentary |
Report a comment Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site. Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report. Comment in question 06-09-2007 17:33 Why Paul is running Republican "Neither Kucinich or Paul stands much chance of winning the Primary. Both share a fatal flaw. They are members of the major political parties and that indicates an acceptance of what these two Parties have done in recent years. Any candidate who is not in agreement with the Party Platform, should run as an Independent. A vote for any Democrat or Republican signals an acceptance of the deadly policies that led to 9/11." On the contrary, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate in agreement with the Republican Party Platform. While you engage in a recent history of foreign policy, you have somehow neglected which party for at least a century had espoused the notion of limited government and limited nation-building. It is only the neoconservative branch of the party, which has gradually expanded its influence within the Republican Party with unprecedented success through its Karl-Rove-et.al calculated reliance on the Evangelical vote, that will make any excuse to expand its power and influence across all vulnerable parts of the world. Ron Paul shouldn't have to start a new Conservative Republican Party; he's doing his best to try and fix the old one, the one through whom he's Congressionally represented Texas for 10 terms. Guest |
NewsletterTranslateMost E-mailed![]() |




