Race, Genetics & behaviour BS

Statements such as \"there are genetic differences and consequently some differences in behaviour between races\" are MEANINGLESS if one cannot qualitatively specify or quantitatively measure the genetic differences and the nature verus nurture contributions AND even more so in situations when one cannot assess degree of intermarriage and genetic admixture. 
 
Of course even between chimpanzees and homo sapiens there is about 98% genetic identity! 
 
Those considerations indeed (humanity aside) were the underlying fallacies of Nazi eugenics and right-wing racist American eugenics and UK and US race-IQ assertions (how come Anglos and Germans were so obsessed about this to the point of gross scientific fallacy?). 
 
Pakeha Kiwis (White New Zealanders - though with rape, the milkman syndrome and intermarriage how Pakeha ARE they really?) one would have thought would be well advised to keep a low profile on maltreatment of Indigenous people - the Maori population dropped from about 0.1-0.2 million in 1800 to 42,000 by 1893 due to the British invasion, war, occupation, theft and introduced disease. 
 
NZ has a long record of supporting Anglo-American mass murder of Indigenous People around the World from British India (1.5 BILLION excess deaths over 2 centuries of genocidal British rule) to American Afghanistan (post-invasion excess Indigenous deaths now total 2.5 MILLION) (see \"The Cost of War\" and my book \"Body Count\" in the link provided below). 
 
While the Clark Government is easily the BEST of the Anglo Governments in the world (it is oppposed to nuclear weapons and is not in Iraq) it is STILL complicit in the cowardly, racist, mass murder of about 1,000 Indigenous Afghan infants EVERY DAY (90% avoidable and due to US and Anglo ally war crimes - they only permit an annual per capita total medical expenditure of about $20 in Occupied Afghanistan: at that level Pakeha Kiwis would ALSO be dying like flies). 
 
One could have more sympathy for the bleatings of the Kiwis (Kiwi squawking rather than ovine bleating?) about the UN Indigenous Rights Declaration if they weren\'t so actively involved in the conquest, deprivation and mass murder of Indigenous People in the proto-Nazi, human rights-abusing, Indigenous People mass murdering American Empire. 
 
What they are really saying is that the Pakehas (Anglos) have had a 500 year Anglo \"tradition\" of conquering, murdering and dispossessing Indigenous people and are STILL doing it today both at home (less so) and abroad (egregiously). 
 
The deadly Kiwis are complicit in the about 20 million avoidable deaths (mostly of Women and Children) associated with US post-1950 Asian Wars.  
 
Further, the UN Declaration is not BINDING - it simply RECOMMENDS against conquering, murdering, disposessing and otherwise violating the human rights of Indigenous People - a pretty reasonable recommendation in the view of anti-racist humanitarians around the world. 
 
Thereis a n urgent need toprotect Indigenous People today from mass murdering, proto-Nazi Anglo Bush-ites in a swathe of US- or US surrogate-occupied countries from Haiti to Afghanistan.

http://mwcnews.net/content/view/1375/247/

Guest