Well Polya..

I just want some explanation on a few statements you made.. 
1. How can you call Northern-Iraq, (home to a terrorist organisation recognised by Nato, US, EU and UN called PKK) a peaceful land? 
Starting from this statement, I can feel the anti-Turkish mentality you have.. 
2. How can scholars and historians from the U.S, most lived on these times know about particular events that happened 100 years ago on the other end of the world, better than those people who lived there? An information if you dont know, Turkish people are also known for their perfect archiving of events.. 
3. If this genocide is planned and programmed, as indicated in the definition of the word "genocide", do you find it rational that a nation, who lost a world war, whose biggest city Istanbul is occupied by Allied forces, and who is fighting an "independence war" in it's western regions against the bigger armies of the times with people contributing even with forks, and people waiting for fellow soldiers to die to pick up a weapon for themselves, would really find the time to plan and accommodate an actual genocide? 
 
This you got there is the wrong mentality my friend.. You should look in both sides of the arguement if you want to find a conclusion to your never-ending genocide stories.. 
Do you tell the U.S public that, the Armenians that Ottoman Empire fought against were seperatist groups mostly living on mountains and attacking traders and passangers on the ways between cities in eastern regions, at the times of war? 
In today's terms you would call them terrorists, wouldn't you? 
And many pictures shown as evidence, are partly irrevelant, and even worse some are fake pictures and those people there are Turkish casualties not Armenian.. 
 
Bur since Turkey, can not lobby around the western world like Armenians, Saying "those muslims killed this many christians there." it's quite harder to take people's attentions to our arguements.. 
 
Thanks for your time..

Guest