Choose Truth over Propoganda...

1 
The topic of genocide is a very emotive one and carries with it stigma and shame and recompense, that not only effects the people of the time that it occurred/allegedly occurred in, but also for many, many generations thereafter. Therefore, it is important to be careful that you have your facts straight, when making such a claim.  
 
In every case where an alleged criminal act has been committed and there is a suspect and an alleged victim, the common presumption (at least in Australia, as I understood it from basic legal studies in public high school in Australia), is that the suspect is ‘innocent until PROVEN guilty’. The accused is given the benefit of doubt. The onus is on the ACCUSER to PROVE guilt. 
 
In order for the charge against the defendant to be proven, there needs to be an impartial hearing of both sides, where both parties are allowed to present their own evidence and testimony and cross examine the evidence and testimony of the counter party. After which, the judge/s or arbitrator/s examine/s ALL of the evidence and testimony and come/s to a decision. This is called a FAIR TRIAL. 
 
In this respect, where the Alleged Armenian genocide is concerned, the Turks have not been given a fair trial.  
 
The Armenian diaspora have, over the years, worked endlessly in the west, lobbying governments, collecting donations and spreading their own word. They have been reaping the ‘rewards’ of their efforts over the past few years. Many nations have accepted and officially recognised their ‘ALLEGATIONS’ as ‘TRUTHS’, without questioning the accuracy of their evidence or testimony. So much so that, it is now a crime in some parts of the western world, (where free speech is, hypocritically, said to be held in high regard) to state that the Armenian genocide is a fallacy.  
 
Any evidence and or testimony submitted to counter their ‘ALLEGATIONS’ have been denied an ‘impartial’ and ‘fair’ hearing by particularly the western world, and are merely discarded as ‘genocide denial’.  
 
‘Denial’, in my understanding of the word, is the refusal to admit that which is true or real. As ALL of the evidence and testimony of BOTH parties to the ALLEGED Armenian genocide have NOT been examined by an IMPARTIAL ARBITRATOR’S and as NO FAIR CONCLUSION has been reached, it is in NO WAY FAIR, to state that the occurrences of 1915 was genocide. That is, the alleged ‘Armenian genocide’ has NEVER BEEN PROVEN to be ‘true’ or ‘real’ in the observances of an impartial arbitrator. Thus, stating that the Armenian genocide is a fallacy, cannot and should not be referred to as ‘denial’. Except of course by those who are either ignorant, or have other agendas to pursue.

Guest