This article is so grossly wrong, with so many factual errors (let's leave the opinions out for now), that a sentence by sentence rebuttal would go on forever.  
 
I encourage readers to check for themselves the statements purported to be facts in this letter, especially those dealing with where spent nuclear fuel could be transported and what would happen to a transportation cask in an accident. 
 
Reasonable people can disagree on nuclear power. It's those who use fear and fiction who are NOT reasonable, and don't deserve your attention.

Guest