Home
Commentary
OPINIONS
Commentary
OPINIONS |
Report a comment Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site. Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report. Comment in question 06-12-2007 17:42 Who need to confess? Many people - especially scientists - find it very difficult for a variety of compelling technical reasons to accept the "official story" about 9/11 from the egegiously dishonest Bush Administration BUT adduce a powerful counter-argument to US or US surrogate complcity (as in post #1) that surely people "in the know" would eventually "talk". However the situation with ex-President Cossiga of Italy illustrates just how the Western Murdochracy works: a leading Western Eiropean politician with close involvement with Intelligence states in a top Italian newspaper that (a) the US and Israel were involved in 9/11 and (b) major intelligence agencies know this - and it goes UN-REPORTED in mainstream media. Accepting Cossiga's version for the purposes of argument (i.e. US and Israel complicity) , what and how many Western spooks or politicians would need to confess involvement in 9/11 before mainstream media would actually report it? Registered |
NewsletterTranslateMost E-mailed![]() |
| toolbar powered by Conduit |




