Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
03-01-2008 15:27
The Pattern of U.S. Foreign Policy
By the end of the Bush Administration, we could be faced with a string of foreign policy problems across the Islamic world all significantly more serious than they are today (e.g., Iraq, Somalia, Lebanon, Palestine). Not least could be Pakistan. One possible scenario is a popular Pakistani revolt against the military, with the pro-democratic forces joining the Taliban against the U.S.-supported military-intelligence complex that runs the Pakistani dictatorship. Alternatively, the military dictatorship may consolidate its control, persuading the generals that they will have a free hand to continue their 20-year-long campaign of passing nuclear weapons technology around the world. 
Washington’s approach seems to be military force (vis-à-vis Iraq, Somalia, Hamas); military dictatorship (vis-à-vis Pakistan, Israeli control over Palestine); and no compromise (vis-à-vis Hezballah, Hamas, Islamic Courts Union, Iran). Is this approach working or do we need a fundamentally different way of behaving toward the world?
Guest
 

Translate

Enter Amount: