Has more than those current 3 phonies

No honorable man? Time element is not listed in Websters Dictionary under the word honorable. He is honorable in that he will change the dialogue in the debates. The one that was snuffed out by the media on Kuchinic and Gravel in the TV debates, tehy made a habit of scirting the left leaning canidates and giving them less question time and finally to ban them from debate as in Las Vegas. Nader has earned himself much honor. He dose not have the blood on his hands that Obama and Hilary do from the Aafghanistan war and Iraq. He is not backed by mega pharmacy and medical backing as Obama is. Or the umteen that back Hilary. Probably as in the last debates the democratic will try to ban him from the debates, like when he ran before. They fear him because he is honorable he has a work ethics record that truely says he workss for the people and not capitalisms evil corporations that are ruining the world for their greed. No Nader has much honor, that many do not wish to be seen, so they will just ban him. Many people do not realize that 3rd party canidates have to go by a differant set of rules to even get in the game, and even after submitting all the requirements, theycan be contested to hold back their campaign. The democratic party is usually always the one to contest signatures and to try tocreate a recount and verification to slow teh 3rd party canidate down. Now that what I would say is not honorable. You see the more a message is herd the harder it is to control the public and narrow the issues down as the media and the major corporations want. As the media have recently said the Iraq war has fallen off the publics screen. No just the questions asked are controled. Just like you won\'t hear Obama talk about closing the military bases down in Iraq, moving some troops home is not shuting down a military presence at the numerous bases in Iraq, or next door in Afghanistan. U.S. military industrial complex needs to be cut back, continuing to rob the rest of the world at the expense of the poor so U.S. corporations can rape other countries at the point of our guns and bombs. Both the democrate and republican parties are responsible. Many of the offensives started during Bush Sr. and Clinton. Clintons Free Trade Agreement may have been nice for our stock markets, but they were disastrous for the people of those countries. You fear Nader it is that simple. Obama and Hiliary wouldn\'t get my vote any way. 3rd party canidates tend to get in late as a rule caused by part of the two party control, to keep them out for as long as they can, should they manage to get in, its much steeper hill for them. Something that needs to change, and Nader would change it if elected.

Guest