Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
28-07-2008 22:15
Top Scientists VS Anon sceptics
The US Surgeon General made his expert report on the smoking-cancer connection half a century ago - today smoking-cancer sceptic tobacco lobbyists are SCORNED for their irresponsibility and would surely be condemned MORE SO if they applied abusive descriptves to him such as "psycho ... rant ... uninformed fool ... new religion...nutjob, rentseeker, snake oil salesman, mentally ill... axe to grind with society ... seeking to justify ...worthless lives ... deluded mindset" (see horribly abusive post #11).  
 
Readers of this thread have to decide between top US and World specialist climate scientists such as Dr James Hansen (top US climate scientist; Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; member of the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences; 2007 Award for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility of the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's biggest general scientific organization and responsible for the world's most prestigious scientific journal, Science) who warn of a threat to human health and survival from the climate emergency VERSUS uncredentialled, abusive, anonymous bloggers. 
 
For 24 opinions from top world climate scientists, other outstanding scientists and top scientific organizations see: CLIMATE EMERGENCY: What Top World Scientific Experts Sayc/- the Melbourne-based Yarra Valley Climate Action Group .
Guest
 

Translate

Enter Amount: