Dr. Gideon Polya wrote: "Further, "zero tolerance for racism", "never again to anyone" and "bear witness" are the fundamental, moral messages from the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation)..." 
 
Suppose for a moment that every word we were ever told about this, and virtually everything else, is a lie. It this era of false flag terrorism, nothing can be believed without proof. 
 
Just take 72 minutes to view "Judea Declares War on Germany" at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901 Wouldn't you like to wake up and discover it was all a nightmare? 
 
If you begin to have doubts, do some more research. A good place to start is The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against The Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, by Arthur R. Butz: http://vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/index.html#toc 
 
I quote: 
 
Chapter 1: 
Trials, Jews and Nazis 
Trials and Doubts 
 
While the IMT and NMT trials were being conducted, several lesser trials were taking place. Among these were the trials held at the Dachau camp (outside Munich and thus not far from Nuremberg) of the staffs of some concentration camps (Buchenwald, Flossenb FCrg, Dachau) that had been captured by the Americans and of those accused of killing 83 American prisoners at Malmedy during the Battle of the Bulge. These trials were supervised by the War Crimes Branch.[38] They were perhaps the most shameful episodes in U.S. history. 
 
The entire repertoire of third degree methods was enacted at Dachau: beatings and brutal kicking, to the point of ruining testicles in 137 cases, knocking out teeth, starvation, solitary confinement, torture with burning splinters, and impersonation of priests in order to encourage prisoners to "confess." Low rank prisoners were assured that convictions were being sought only against higher ranking officers and that they had absolutely nothing to lose by cooperating and making the desired statements. Such "evidence" was then used against them when they joined their superiors in the dock. The latter, on the other hand, had been told that by "confessing" they had taken all responsibility onto themselves, thereby shielding their men from trial. A favorite stratagem, when a prisoner refused to cooperate, was to arrange a mock trial. The prisoner was led into a room in which civilian investigators, dressed in U.S. Army uniforms, were seated around a black table with a crucifix in the center, with two candles providing the only light. This "court" then proceeded to hold a sham trial, at the conclusion of which a sham death sentence was passed. The "condemned" prisoner was later promised that, if he cooperated with the prosecutors in giving evidence, he would be reprieved. Sometimes interrogators threatened to turn prisoners over to the Russians. In many cases the prisoner's family was threatened with loss of ration cards or other hardships if cooperation was not obtained. 
 
As distinct from the mock trials, the official trials were also an apparently deliberate mockery of any conception of due process. The mockery started with the "indictment," which made only general reference to very broad categories of crimes allegedly committed in the years from 1942 to 1945 (in the cases of concentration camp personnel), and then proceeded to present a long list of defendants accused of being criminal in the extremely general sense stated. Specific crimes by specific people on specific dates were not  
part of the indictments (e.g. document 3590-PS).... 
 
One notable incident occurred when investigator Joseph Kirschbaum brought a certain Einstein into court to testify that the accused Menzel had murdered Einstein's brother. When the accused was able to point out that the brother was alive and well and, in fact, sitting in court, Kirschbaum was deeply embarrassed and scolded poor Einstein: 
 
"How can we bring this pig to the gallows, if you are so stupid to bring your brother into court?" http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/thottc/5.html

http://www.propeller.com/member/markoller/

Guest