Home arrow Commentary arrow op-ed arrow Waist Deep in the Big Muddy
Jan 11 2007
Waist Deep in the Big Muddy | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Greg Palast   

Translation

Digg!

Waist Deep in the Big Muddy

ImageGeorge W. Bush has an urge to surge.  Like every junkie, he asks for just one more fix:  let him inject just 21,000 more troops and that will win the war.

Been there.  Done that.  In 1965, Tom Paxton sang,

 


Lyndon Johnson told the nation
  Have no fear of escalation.
  I am trying everyone to please.
  Though it isn't really war, 
  We're sending 50,000 more
  To help save Vietnam from the Vietnamese.

Four decades later, Bush is asking us to save Iraq from the Iraqis. 

There's always a problem with giving a junkie another fix.  It can only make things worse.  Our maximum leader says that unless he gets to mainline another 21,000 troops, "Iran would be emboldened in its pursuit of nuclear weapons," and terrorists "would have a safe haven from which to plan and launch attacks on the American people." 

Excuse me, but didn't we hear that same promise in 2003?  Nearly four years ago, on the eve of invasion, this same George Bush promised, "The terrorist threat to America and the world will be diminished the moment that Saddam Hussein is disarmed."

Instead of diminishing the threat from terrorists, Bush now admits, "Al Qaeda has a home base in Anbar province" -- something inconceivable under Saddam's rule.

Four years ago, Bush promised us, "When the dictator has departed, [Iraq] can set an example to all the Middle East of a vital and peaceful and self-governing nation."  Just send in the 82d Airborne and, lickety-split, we'd have, "A new Iraq that is prosperous and free."

Well, fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

Here's my question:  Who asked the waiter to deliver this dish?  Who asked for the 21,000 soldiers?

We know the US military didn't ask for the 21,000 troops.  (Outgoing commander General George Casey called for a troop reduction.)

We know the Iraqi government didn't ask for the 21,000 troops.  (Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki is reportedly unhappy about a visible increase in foreign occupiers).

So who wants the occupation to continue?  The answer is in Riyadh.  When the King of Saudi Arabia hauled Dick Cheney before his throne on Thanksgiving weekend, the keeper of America's oil laid down the law to Veep:  the US will not withdraw from Iraq. 

According to Nawaf Obaid, a Saudi who signals to the US government the commands and diktats of the House of Saud, the Saudis are concerned that a US pull-out will leave their Sunni brothers in Iraq to be slaughtered by Shia militias.  More important, the Saudis will not tolerate a Shia-majority government in Iraq controlled by the Shia mullahs of Iran.  A Shia combine would threaten Saudi Arabia's hegemony in the OPEC oil cartel.

In other words, it's about the oil.

So what's the solution?  What's my plan?  How do we get out of Iraq?  Answer:  the same way we got out of 'Nam.  In ships.

But can we just watch from the ship rail as Shia slaughter Sunnis in Baghdad, Sunnis murder Shia in Anbar, Kurds "cleanse" Kirkuk of Turkmen and so on in a sickening daisy-chain of ethnic atrocities?

No.  There's a real alternative.  And it isn't more troops, George. 

Let's imagine that somehow we could rip away the strings that allow Cheney and Rove and Abdullah to control our puppet president and he somehow, like the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz, suddenly grew a brain.  His speech last night would have sounded like this:

"My fellow Americans.  Iraq is going to hell in a handbag.  So the whole shebang doesn't collapse into mayhem and madness, we need to send in 21,000 more troops.  So I've just wired King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and told him to send them. 

"My missive to the monarch reads:  Dear Abdullah.  It's time your 16,000 princelings got out of their Rolls Royces and formed the core of an Islamic Peacekeeping Force to prevent mass murder in Iraq.  The American people are tired of you using the 82d Airborne as your private mercenary army.  It seems like the Saudi military's marching song is, 'Onward Christian Soldiers.'

"Well, King Ab, we're out of here.  We're folding tents and loading the wagons.  For four years now, Saudis have been secretly funding the berserkers in the Iraqi 'insurgency' while the Iranians are backing the crazies in the militias.  Well, we're telling you and the Persians:  you're going to have to stop using your checkbooks to fund a proxy war and instead start keeping the peace.  It's time you put your own tushies in the line of fire for a change."

"If the African Union nations, poor as they are, can maintain a peacekeeping force to stop killings in Sudan and Senegal, you Saudis, with all the military toys we've sold you, can certainly join with your Muslim brothers in Jordan, Iran and Turkey to take responsibility for your region's peace.

"And when you get to Fallujah, don't forget to drop us a postcard."

Well, that's my fantasy.  But instead, War Junkie George will get his fix of another 21,000 American soldiers.

It reminds me far too chillingly of a Pete Seeger tune written when LBJ was saving Vietnam from Vietnamese.  It was based on the true story of a US platoon in training, wading into the rising Mississippi, whose commander order them to keep going, deeper and deeper -- until they drowned.

We're waste deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on.

Greg Palast is the author of Armed Madhouse : Who's Afraid of Osama Wolf?, China Floats Bush Sinks, the Scheme to Steal '08 and other Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class War. NY Times Bestseller list!

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1491

Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 13-01-2007 19:40
Nice opinion piece, but I find the reasons behind the 
escalation (and, by insinuation, the war?) ludicrous. 
Saying that the U.S. is a puppet of Saudi Arabia 
ignores American agency in the region and 
oversimplifies a complex situation. Ironically, while 
decrying the selective memory of the public, Palast 
requires us to ignore important parts of the Iraq war 
narrative and counter-narrative. 
 
It is true that some army commanders do not want an 
escalation, because they want a withdrawal. Other 
commanders, however, including the Joint Chiefs, argue 
that if the U.S. is going to protect its "vital 
interests" in the region, it will have to maintain a 
strong presence in the middle east, including Iraq. 
The Council of Foreign Relations echoes these 
sentiments... as do key members of both political 
parties. 
 
The American presence has found many homes, as you 
know, depending on the political situation at the 
time. We have backed Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and 
Saudi Arabia when expedient. You are probably familiar 
with our complex and shifting system of alliances in 
the region so I won't go into that here.  
 
It will suffice to say, however, that the United States historically has found new allies (puppets) 
when its original ones either began to demand more 
control over the strings or the political situation 
within the country itself (popular movements, state 
sponsored religious fanaticism, etc.) made it either 
embarassing or difficult for continued American 
presence. 
 
Iraq falls under the first category and Iran the 
second. Saudi Arabia is a more complex situation 
because it is not DEPENDENT on American "aid." We 
could, however, over-simplify (ala Palast?) and place it in the 
second category. After all, the links between Saudi Arabia and 9/11 are well documented, as are the links 
between the House of Saud and American businesses.  
 
Incidentally, the convolution of oil, business, and 
religion has meant American tacit support and approval 
of the Wahhabi branch of Islam, which has given us fun 
stories and characters like the Mujahadeen, the 
Iran-Contra scandal, and links between our favorite 
President (Reagan) and mass murder and terrorism on a 
global scale. Policy experts have argued for years 
that the U.S. has to find another ally in the region 
other than Saudi Arabia to limit future embarrassment. 
 
 
Anyway, my point is that if we pretend that 
Saudi-Arabia is driving the escalation wagon, rather 
than sitting in the backseat, we are ignoring 50+ 
years of American diplomacy and war. 
 
It is true on some level that Curious George is 
pressured to stay in Iraq because of Saudi Arabia, but 
not because of anything that the king might or might 
not have said to Cheney on Thanksgiving; it is what 
the crown and the U.S. have done together and 
independently that has charted the American course in 
Iraq. 
 
Securing Iraq as America's proxy in the region will 
accomplish several things, from a policy and strategic 
standpoint: 
 
1) provide the United States with a source of cheap 
oil 
 
2) allow the U.S. to ween itself off of Saudi oil 
dependency and therefore take a more active (read 
"military") stance against "terrorism" 
 
3) control Iraqi oil to check the growth of the U.S's 
upstart Russian, European, and Chinese capitalist 
rivals and force them to invest in the American dollar 
everytime that they purchase oil to fund their growing 
infrastructures 
 
4) provide another American pillar of influence in the 
region besides Israel.  
 
You will notice that none of these reasons mention 
"making the king of Saudi Arabia happy."
Guest
Alan Burke

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Greg Palast George W. Bush Bush Plan
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar