Home arrow Opinions arrow The Last Days of the American Republic
Apr 05 2007
The Last Days of the American Republic | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By MWC News   

Translation

Our Patience on Iraq Should Be Exhausted
by Sheldon Richman, guest columnist

ImagePresident Bush started the fifth year of his war in Iraq by pleading with the American people for patience. Give the escalation ("surge") a chance to work, he said. He sees signs of success already, but the Democrats in Congress are showing their impatience, with the House attaching a 2008 withdrawal deadline to the war appropriations bill and the Senate set to consider the same legislation.

In the discussion over whether the recent increase in troops will achieve the stated objective, the big picture is getting lost. Even most war critics in Congress seem to not fully see it. They routinely criticize the Bush administration for its incompetent execution of the war, but by doing so they have dropped the more important ball: regardless of how the war is being run, the invasion was illegal, unconstitutional, and contrary to the interests of the American people.

Americans are overwhelmingly unhappy with the war, but how would they feel if it seemed to be going well? The administration, it seems, believes that they would support it if they thought "America was winning." That's why they and their cheerleaders emphasize anything that looks like a glimmer of progress and denigrate the bringers of bad news. We've seen this tactic many times before.

But even if the war were "going well" it would be morally and politically objectionable. It must be viewed as one piece of an imperial program that has placed U.S. military bases in 130 countries, according to Chalmers Johnson, author of Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan mean more permanent bases. Hundreds of thousands of American military personnel are stationed all around the globe. House Republicans denounced the withdrawal deadline by arguing that it would endanger the U.S. troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and "around the world." About the only concern one hears expressed about this is that the military is stretched too thin to fight another war, perhaps against Iran.

When are ordinary Americans going to realize they are financiers and fodder for a worldwide empire? When will they demand an explanation from those who call themselves our leaders. We're told the network of far-flung interests is for our own security, but as Johnson and others have shown, global military and political intervention makes enemies for the country, invites terrorism ("blowback"), and hence endangers Americans at home and abroad. How many examples do we need? September 11 should have been enough for even the dullest of observers. It's time to end the scam: our alleged protectors are in fact the greatest threat to our liberty today. Even the U.S. government admits that the war in Iraq is creating terrorists.

The morally bankrupt administration has nothing left to do but beg for more time and engage in rank demagoguery. After the House passed the withdrawal deadline, Vice President Dick Cheney, who talks to Americans as though we are morons, said those who voted yes are "not supporting the troops. They're undermining them." Such posturing is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Cheney would have us believe that the way to support the troops is to insert them into a brutal war far from home, bashing down doors, searching civilians, and even firing on them and killing them. In his Orwellian world "support" means not letting anyone say what everyone knows: that the troops have been put in the untenable position of an occupying army. They are not fighting for "our freedom"; they are doing the bidding of politicians bent on shoring up a crumbling empire.

They are not fighting for the Iraqis' freedom either. Is anyone surprised that public-opinion polls show that Iraqis believe things have gotten worse for them since the fall of Saddam Hussein?

Once again, foreign intervention has given America a black eye. When will we learn?

Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation (www.fff.org) and editor of The Freeman magazine.

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1466

Comments (4)
RSS comments
1. 05-04-2007 18:30
What would be good to focus on next might be What is \'American Empire\'? I would suggest it\'s an illusion because what it brings to mind is some nationalistic enterprise based on the aggrandisement or at least the furthering of it\'s own interests. This, I believe is no longer true. The \'American Empire\' has been co-opted, hollowed out, destroyed by the now reigning corporatocracy represented by the Bush/Cheney Admin. Whether the American citizenry will ever be able to regain control of their country remains to be seen; the difference between the two political parties exists in the sense that they have different goals, seemingly, but corporate interests also strongly influence the electoral success of both. One is completely craven the other is beholden. The media must be reregulated to eliminate monopoly and the \'war chests\' for the running of candidates will have to be limited equally before we will ever see any possible return to nationhood in any real sense.
Guest
2. 06-04-2007 13:54
We are surrounded by unprincipled traitors, for our leftists to win, our military must lose and America must lose. As absurd as that sounds, that is the reality of the situation. If the war against terror is successful, Bush is successful. That is something the leftists cannot tolerate, so Treason is there only avenue, hidden by a thin veneer and claim of freedom of speech. They demand protection while hiding behind the very Constitution there acts are destroying.
Guest
June
3. 06-04-2007 13:55
JuneBug said, in part, this: 
 
"...so Treason is there only avenue.... " 
 
As you can see there are two words misused in that brief phrase. One is Treason, and the other is there.  
 
Treason has a definition, of which, Junebug hasn't the slightest concept. Hence the misuse of that word. 
 
But there's no hope of JuneBug mastering the other misused word, because there are three words that sound the same, but are spelled differently. I don't think we can expect her to sort out that many....in one heroic cranial effort.  
 
So I'm holding out hope that she can master the word Treason, sometime in the next 6 to 18 months. I know that's not giving her much time to meet the challenge but I don't see any reason to hold her to a low standard of learning. Someone has already done that to her.  
 
Class is in session: 
 
JuneBug.....can you define Treason?  
 
and 
 
Can you tell us WHERE to find the legal definition of Treason??
Guest
otole
4. 06-04-2007 13:56
RE=JUNE
"We are surrounded by unprincipled traitors, for our leftists to win, our military must lose and America must lose." 
 
The Bush War was lost the day we set foot in Iraq. Only an idiot would have sent troops in there to occupy. Even Bush's daddy knew better.
Guest
Denny

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Sheldon Richman Iraq war American Republic
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: