Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow To Impeach, or Not to Impeach
May 16 2007
To Impeach, or Not to Impeach | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By MWC NEWS   

Translation

To Impeach, or Not to Impeach
By Rosemarie Jackowski, guest columnist
  

Ben Heine / MWC NEWS
Ben Heine / MWC NEWS
The problem with Liberals is that they still don't get it. Many are calling for the Impeachment of Bush because "we were lied into a war". There are several fallacies here.

First, the lies were so transparent that it is hard to understand how anyone could have been so duped. The WMD lie was not believed by many who were keeping themselves informed, Scott Ritter for one.

Second, even if Iraq did have WMDs, it would not have justified an illegal, pre-emptive war in which thousands of civilians were killed. This second issue is important because it implies that the United States has the legal and moral authority to decide which countries should have the right to weapon systems. This arrogant, xenophobic attitude has increased the hatred against the United States.

There is something very wrong about allowing the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons to kill civilians, to decide which countries should be allowed to have nuclear weapons. In a perfect world there would be no weapon systems, nuclear or otherwise. In the real world it is sometimes suggested that every nation should be given at least one nuclear weapon that could be used in a retaliatory strike. This is an old idea which used to be called MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction.

Third, calling for Impeachment trivializes the war crimes. Imagine looking back on history. Why is there such amnesia about the reasons for the Nuremberg trials? Does anyone believe that the Impeachment of Hitler would have been the appropriate response to the war crimes during his administration? The USA has been bombing Iraq since 1991. This time frame includes the Clinton Administration, a fact conveniently ignored by many Liberals. Some have estimated the number of killed Iraqi civilians at more than 2 million. A half million Iraqi children died as a result of the U.S. sanctions. War crimes trials should be held. The defendants could be tried in absentia, which would be necessary since the accused would not be likely to make a voluntary court appearance.

Fourth, calling for the Impeachment of Bush/Cheney lets Congress off the hook. Congress became complicit when it abdicated its authority under the U.S. Constitution and caved in to the war-lust of the Executive Branch. Every member of Congress should be held responsible for his/her vote and tried along with those in the Executive Branch. In fact, the responsible members of Congress should be put on trial first. Without their votes, there would have been no war.

There is no logical reason for optimism. All of the anti-war protests in the world cannot stop this war machine. War has become so profitable for the corporations that they will continue. The corporations that manufacture weapon systems rely on the Principle of Perpetual War. Peace has become a victim of Planned Obsolescence. Weapons produce profits only when they are used. War is necessary for the continuation of the Capitalistic system. In 1937, General Smedley Butler wrote, "War is a Racket".  In 2007, war is still a racket. That leaves all of humanity with a dilemma. The United States has painted the human race into a nuclear corner with no way out.

War crimes trials might be the last hope for humanity.

Rosemarie Jackowski is an advocacy journalist living in the USA.  She was arrested, tried, and convicted for her participation in a peaceful protest of the war.  The conviction was appealed and overturned in the State Supreme Court.  The government then announced plans to retry the case. Finally,  after years of legal proceedings, all charges were dropped.  She can be reached at: dissent@sover.net 

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1383

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 17-05-2007 05:23
I think if you look you will find a signing statement that gives Bush immunity from impeachment.
Miller
2. 17-05-2007 05:24
RE:
Eisenhower warned about this.
hawkeye
3. 17-05-2007 20:40
RE:
On the Democratic side, every presidential candidate running today who was in the Senate when the motion to authorize the use of force came up?Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Joe Biden and Chris Dodd?voted yes. Outside of government, the case for war was made not just by the neoconservative Weekly Standard but to select almost randomly the traditionally conservative National Review, the liberal New Republic and the center-right Economist. Of course, most neoconservatives supported the war, the case for which was also being made by journalists and scholars from every point on the political spectrum. Perhaps the most influential tome on behalf of war was written not by any conservative, let alone neoconservative, but by Kenneth Pollack, Clinton's top Near East official on the National Security Council. The title: The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq.  
 
Everyone has the right to renounce past views. But not to make up that past. It is beyond brazen to think that one can get away with inventing not ancient history but what everyone saw and read with their own eyes just a few years ago.
wand
4. 19-11-2007 16:20
RE:
Only someone completely irrational and out of touch with American politics (let alone reality itself) would even consider the impeachment if president Bush... This is why you only hear talk about such nonsense on wacko/extremist sites like mwcnews.com
5. 20-11-2007 03:26
re=
Quote:
This is why you only hear talk about such nonsense on wacko/extremist sites like mwcnews.com

 
 
mwcnews.com? That is the only domain we don't have here 
 
We have: 
http://mwcnews.net 
http://mwcnews.org 
http://mwcnews.info 
 
But .com is not one of those. 
 
Thanks for the intelligent debate by the way.
Shahram

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Rosemarie Jackowski Impeach
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar