Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Reining In an Out-of-Control Executive
Jul 16 2007
Reining In an Out-of-Control Executive | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Marjorie Cohn   

Translation

Reining In an Out-of-Control Executive
By Marjorie Cohn

ImageOur Founding Fathers created three separate but co-equal branches of government to check and balance each other so no one branch would become all powerful. Indeed, James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers, "The preservation of liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct."  Madison warned, "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands ... may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." The American colonists were reacting against a police state. 

More than 200 years later, we have another King George.   In the last six years, George W. Bush has sought to accumulate all governing powers in the same hands - his.  In the Declaration of Independence, the framers charged that the King "refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good."  Bush has repeatedly violated the Constitution's command that the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," by breaking some and refusing to enforce others.  The Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws; after both houses pass a bill, the President can only sign it or veto it. Bush, however, takes a different tack.  He has vetoed just three bills, then quietly attached "signing statements" to more than 1,000 congressional laws, indicating his intent to follow only those parts with which he agrees.

In an end run around Congress and the courts, Bush secretly authorized the Terrorist Surveillance Program to conduct electronic surveillance without a judicial warrant, in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Fourth Amendment.  Although two judges on a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the legality of Bush's spying program for lack of standing, the only two judges ever to rule on the merits declared the program illegal.

The Bush administration lied to Congress to get authority to invade Iraq.  Long before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Bush and his officials were planning to attack Iraq and change its regime.  Dick Cheney's secret energy task force drew up maps of Iraq's oil fields to divvy up the black gold once we occupied that country.  They then devised an elaborate scheme to convince the American people that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the United States, notwithstanding overwhelming intelligence to the contrary.  Since Bush launched "Operation Iraq Freedom," more than 3,600 American soldiers and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis have died; many thousands more have been wounded.  This invasion is a war of aggression, which violates the UN Charter, because it was neither executed in self-defense nor approved by the Security Council.

During the war, U.S. troops have been acting under rules of engagement - free-fire zones - that have led some to commit war crimes.   For instance, the killing, execution-style, of 24 civilians in the Haditha Massacre, the execution of a disabled man, and the shooting of a wounded unarmed Iraqi in a mosque violate the Geneva Conventions which prohibit willful killing of civilians.  Commanders, all the way up the chain to the commander-in-chief, could be convicted of war crimes if they should've known their subordinates would commit them and the commanders didn't stop or prevent it.

Bush's legal eagles, particularly David Addington and John Yoo, concocted elaborate "legal" arguments to justify the torture of prisoners.  Never mind that international and American law forbid torture under all circumstances.  Pursuant to a common plan to violate the Geneva Conventions and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, prisoners in U.S. custody are being tortured and abused.  Prisoners have been subjected to water-boarding, attacks by dogs, sexual humiliation, and excruciatingly painful force-feeding.

The Bush administration has secretly rendered prisoners to other countries to be tortured.  One former CIA agent observed, "If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria.  If you want someone to disappear - never to see them again - you send them to Egypt."

The Bush administration has secretly rendered prisoners to other countries to be tortured.  One former CIA agent observed, "If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria.  If you want someone to disappear - never to see them again - you send them to Egypt."

Shortly after 9/11, the Bush gang set up a prison camp in Guantánamo, intending to create a legal black hole where they could hold prisoners for the rest of their lives without any judicial oversight.  But the Supreme Court didn't buy the administration's argument that U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over Guantánamo because it's in Cuba.  And the Court struck down Bush's original military commissions since they violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions.

The Supreme Court said in Berger v. United States that a prosecutor's job is to see that justice is done, not to politicize justice.  But Bush's Department of Justice, the chief law enforcement agency in the government, has been seriously compromised.  Several U.S. attorneys who refused to bring frivolous charges that would further Bush's political agenda, or who brought charges that didn't, were purged.

The White House is resisting congressional subpoenas that call for testimonial and documentary evidence about the U.S. attorney firing scandal.  The deadline for Bush, Cheney and the Justice Department to produce documents in response to Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenas about the warrantless surveillance is July 18.  In 1974, when the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon, Article III charged refusal to comply with subpoenas during the Watergate hearings.

Marjorie Cohn,  MWC News Magazine senior editor, is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and the President of the National Lawyers Guild. Her new book, Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent (with Kathleen Gilberd), will be published this winter by PoliPointPress. Her articles are archived at www.marjoriecohn.com.
Other articles by this author

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 2071

Comments (18)
RSS comments
1. 16-07-2007 10:05
One would hope that a lawyer would realize that allegations, before a judicial proceeding is complete, are simply allegations. 
 
Obviously, you believe that allegations are fact when they support your particular agenda. 
 
You describe the "killing, execution-style, of 24 civilians in the Haditha Massacre".  
 
Are you following the hearings? These allegations have been disproved. 
 
Do facts matter to you at all? 
 
Or are facts merely pesky irritants to be swatted out of the way when you need to make the United States a symbol of evil?
Guest
allendernyc@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">David Allender
2. 16-07-2007 10:55
re=David Allender
Quote:
 
 
You describe the "killing, execution-style, of 24 civilians in the Haditha Massacre".  
 
Are you following the hearings? These allegations have been disproved.

 
 
Those allegation has been disapproved by whom? 
 
Because I have three news report( did not bother to look for more but I am sure there are) that says otherwise. 
 
Click on the links bellow 
US marines granted Haditha immunity  
Marines faulted in Haditha killings  
US marine: Haditha Iraqis had guns  
Quote:
 
Do facts matter to you at all?  

 
Could you kindly respond to your own question?
Guest
Shahram
3. 16-07-2007 13:27
re=David Allender
The United States to which I belong, is regaurded by many as a symbol of evil. I use to blame it all on our two questionably elected white house inhabitants. Through knowledge of what these many and I mean many thefts are carried out for, if its not the American people who's desires are they strifing to see unfold. Can't just be for the oil companies, not to exclude them. Now with more returning vets speaking out, somehow more will here. Yet mainstream media still says so little.
Guest
4. 16-07-2007 14:21
re=David Allender
While the hearings on the Marines at Haditha aren\'t over yet, the testimony and evidence so far reveals that it\'s those Marines who\'ve been railroaded to get the U.S. to fork over some reparations money. 
 
The real crime is that insurgents have mingled with civilians, including children, and the world allows it to happen without a cross word.
Guest
5. 16-07-2007 16:58
re=
So when that Marine shoots and kills 5 years old child sleeping in the bed execution style. He thought the child was an insurgent?
Guest
Shahram
6. 17-07-2007 07:31
re=
That's probably why the scam found such support. The women and children who died were not killed by direct gunfire. 
 
Please note how, even today, after this has gone on for so long, there is no outrage vented at those who fight near women and children. Many blame the Marines for not shooting around them; others blame the insurgents. Sooner or later, we must blame those who were silent.
Guest
7. 18-07-2007 16:59
Reining in US state terrorism
\"The real crime\" is that of US State Terrorism (USST) that is responsible for excess deaths totalling 19 million in post-1950 US Asian wars and the \"real criminals\" are those complicit in the crimes of USST (this complicity ranging from denying, ignoring, minimizing and obfuscating through supporting and advocating to the actual giving of orders and the mass murder of Asian women and children).  
 
From UN Population Division and the latest medical literature data it can be estimated that the post-invasion excess deaths (avoidable deaths, deaths that did not have to happen) in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories now (as of March 2007) total 1.0 million and 2.4 million, respectively and the post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.5 million and 1.9 million, respectively (90% avoidable and due to gross US, UK and White Australian Occupier violation of Articles 38, 55 and 56 the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilian Persons in Time of War (for details and documentation see “The Cost of War” on MWC News; see the link to it and related articles below).
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
8. 19-07-2007 06:02
Reining in US state terrorism
Why only go back to post-1950? Surely, using the bar you've set, these numbers could jump dramatically if we go back to 1940. 
 
And if so, then let's expand the scope to the entire world. If you're going to fault U.S. policy for deaths caused by today's fascists and yesterday's communists, then let's be intellectually honest and add those children who died in London and Stalingrad (not to mention Germans and Poles) during WWII while the U.S. was supporting and supplying those forces. FDR had a lot more blood on his hands when you look at it that way.
Guest
9. 20-07-2007 14:02
Reining in US State Terrorism (USST)
A key EVIL in international law (and indeed what Catholic theologians call the \"natural law\") is the deliberate INVASION and OCCUPATION of foreign countries with attendant horrendous loss of Indigenous lives - that is what imperialists have been doing for about 5,000 years, what the Nazi and Japanese militaristIMPERIALISTS did back in the 1930s and 1940s and what the UNITED STATES and its surrogates (principally Israel, the UK and Racist White Australia) have been doing in country after country since 1950 - Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Panama, Grenada, Dominican Republic, Haiti. 
 
Here is a summation of 1950-2005 excess death (in millions, m) in all countries that America has partially or completely occupied as a major occupier since 1945 at some time (but excluding former Axis countries and the US-funded occupation of Palestine) and is presented for comparative purposes as a ratio (expressed as a percentage) with respect to the 2005 population of these countries (the asterisks indicate major involvement of others in the carnage)(SOURCE: \"American Independence. Freedom for invasion, conquest 7 genocide\" on MWC News - see via the link provided below).  
 
The LIST begins with the United States itself: United States [8.455m/300.038m = 2.8%] - Afghanistan* [16.609m/25.971m = 64.0%], Cambodia* [5.852m/14.825m = 39.5%], Dominican Republic [0.806m/8.998m = 9.0%], Federated States of Micronesia [0.016m/0.111m = 14.4%], Greece* [0.027m/10.978m = 0.2%], Grenada* [0.018m/0.121m = 14.9%], Guam [0.005m/0.168m = 3.0%], Haiti* [4.089m/8.549m = 47.9%], Iraq* [5.283m/26.555m = 19.9%], Korea* [7.958m/71.058m = 11.2%], Laos* [2.653m/5.918m = 44.8%], Panama [0.172m/3.235m = 5.3%], Philippines [9.080m/82.809m = 11.0%], Puerto Rico [0.039m/3.915m = 1.0%], Somalia* [5.568m/10.742m = 51.8%], US Virgin Islands [0.003m/0.113m = 2.4%], Vietnam* [24.015m/83.585m = 28.7%], total = 82.193m/357.651m = 23.0% (source: “BODY COUNT. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ). 
 
The proto-Nazi US and its cowardly, racist allies such as Racist White Australia are STILL killing Women and Children on a huge scale across the world.
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
10. 20-07-2007 17:56
Reining in US State Terrorism (USST)
Let\'s be clear: You are blaming the U.S. for deaths caused by the enemies of the U.S. While you may say the U.S. is responsible for those consequences, the fact remains that you\'re giving license to terrorists that they may kill civilians with no moral cost. 
 
But I am intrigued by your steadfast refusal to expand your analysis ten more years. If it will make you feel better, the far-left did indeed call the Roosevelt administration \"imperialist\" when the U.S. supported Britain in 1940 and early 1941. (That\'s when Stalin was still an ally of Hitler.) Considering that the war could not have continued without aid from the U.S., some of those Battle-of-Britain deaths could easily be added to your tally if you weren\'t so reticent to make these calculations. 
 
This isn\'t to say I\'m sympathetic to these arguments. I\'m simply getting into the spirit of your list. 
 
Notably absent from your post-1950 LIST is a body count for the Bosnian war in the 1990s. I\'m a bit surprised at this. The pretext for U.S. involvement (ethnic cleansing) turned out to be greatly exaggerated, and the consequences appear to be more ethnic cleansing by the other side. I guess that\'s our fault, too.
Guest
11. 20-07-2007 18:32
Reining in US State Terrorism (USST)
Quote:
 
 
But I am intrigued by your steadfast refusal to expand your analysis ten more years. If it will make you feel better, the far-left did indeed call the Roosevelt administration "imperialist" when the U.S. supported Britain in 1940 and early 1941.

 
 
Why ten years? Why not 20 or 40 or while we are there why not start from the ice age?
Guest
Shahram
12. 20-07-2007 18:42
Reining in US State Terrorism (USST)
The above is absurd obfuscation of a war criminal, mass murdering, mass paedoicidal reality (1 under-5 year old infant dies in the Occupoed Iraqi and Afghan Territories EVERY MINUTE, largely due to American war crimes) (Google UNICEF and do the math). 
 
As any sensible reader of MWC News can see, the US involvement in WW2 was to OPPOSE the illegal, war criminal invasion of other countries by Nazi Germany and Japan.  
 
Post-1950 US Asian wars (19 million excess deaths) involved the AMERICAN invasion of other countries.  
 
Those who support the war criminal American, Nazi, Japanese or Calathumpian invasion of other countries are in the SAME moral morass - invasion of other countries is a war criminal violation of the post-war UN Charter and the US has been the principal, war criminal, mass paedocidal violator over the last 60 years.
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
13. 20-07-2007 20:01
Reining in US State Terrorism (USST)
Ahhh, so opposing (some) Nazi aggression is alright, but opposing communist aggression is "immoral." 
 
That makes perfect sense -- especially if you ignore the year 1940 when Nazis and communists were on the same side. It's funny how some things don't really change.
Guest
14. 20-07-2007 23:41
US & US-stooge Israel flout UN Charter
Article 2 of the UN Charter states: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations" - the United States under the proto-Nazi, war criminal, child mass murdering Bush Administration is currently violently occupying 4 states/territories (Haiti, Iraq, Afghanistan and Diego Garcia) and its surrogates Ethiopia and Apartheid Israel are variously violently occupying/partly occupying a further 4 States (Somalia, Syria, Palestine and a tiny part of Lebanon). What gives these proto-Nazi, war criminal rogue states the right invade, occupy, mass murder and terrorize, to flout the UN Charter and International Law?
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
15. 21-07-2007 05:47
re=Randy
Why are you so fixated on 1940? Surly that can not be the proper defence for US that also had very good relation with Nazi Germany and join the allies much later then any other country.
Guest
Shahram
16. 21-07-2007 06:46
re=Randy
It's not that I am fixated with 1940. I am simply observing an all too convenient selection bias in starting a critique from 1950. 
 
As you say, the U.S. entered WWII rather late, but it's not true at all that we had such good relations with Nazi Germany. Roosevelt pushed a foreign policy to support the British in ways that bent the laws. U.S. territorial waters were extended all the way into the middle of the Atlantic in order to claim the right to protect shipping to England. Such a move would be considered absurdly hegemonistic were it tried today. Lend-Lease was another clever way to get around the policy of neutrality. It was strongly protested by isolationists on the right and communists on the left. Workers at arms manufacturers staged strikes to slow production. 
 
In truth, it was actually those isolationists on the right and communists on the left who joined the allies too late. Had Hitler not gone to war against Stalin, some people would undoubtedly still be faulting Roosevelt as the aggressor. 
 
As for Dr. Gideon's question, the U.S. has the right and the duty to fight fascism anywhere it pokes up its head. That goes for the fascism of today as well as the fascism of yesteryear.
Guest
17. 21-07-2007 07:23
re=Randy
True, anyone has the right to fight Fascism , including US, but not to become one itself and replace it with New Fascism, which is the case argued here, by both Professor Cohn and Dr. Polya
Guest
Shahram
18. 21-07-2007 08:26
re=Randy
I agree in principle that we should never become fascist ourselves, but I disagree with all your characterizations that that is what is happening. Roosevelt went much further than Bush ever dreamed of, even prior to the U.S. entry into WWII. But Roosevelt had the advantage of fighting enemies that usually wore uniforms, and he faced an anti-war movement that was breaking up after the communists switched sides.
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Marjorie Cohn Terrorist Surveillance Program Declaration of Independence Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: