Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Features arrow Presidential Order Affirms CIA Secret Detentions
Jul 23 2007
Presidential Order Affirms CIA Secret Detentions | Print |  E-mail
Special Features
By MWC NEWS   

Translation

Allows Detention in Violation of Geneva ConventionsImage

President George W. Bush’s new executive order on the Central Intelligence Agency’s detention and interrogation program is contrary to the Geneva Conventions.

The new order, issued today, purports to determine that the CIA’s detention and interrogation program “fully complies” with US obligations under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as long as the CIA follows a series of requirements in carrying out the program. 
 
But enforced disappearance – the hallmark of the CIA program, involving secret, incommunicado detention – is itself inconsistent with the requirement under Common Article 3 that detainees be treated humanely. A number of CIA prisoners were held for three or more years in secret detention facilities, known as “black sites,” before being transferred to military custody at Guantanamo Bay in September 2006. Others who were believed to have been held in CIA detention remain “disappeared.” 
 
“By international human rights and humanitarian law standards, the CIA program is illegal to its core,” said Joanne Mariner, terrorism and counterterrorism director at Human Rights Watch. “Although the new executive order bars torture and other abuse, the order still can’t purport to legalize a program that violates basic rights.” 
 
Human Rights Watch also expressed skepticism that the treatment requirements set out in the new order – that detainees not be tortured or ill-treated, and be fed adequately, among others – will be followed. It is well documented that holding detainees in prolonged incommunicado detention, without judicial or other independent oversight, is an invitation to torture and other abuse. Human Rights Watch pointed out that even the International Committee of the Red Cross has not been allowed to visit detainees in CIA custody. 
 
In addition, because the written policies governing the CIA interrogation program will be classified, it will be impossible for any outside monitor to assess whether the interrogation practices they allow are consistent with international standards. Given that then-CIA director Porter Goss once referred to waterboarding – a form of mock drowning – as a “professional interrogation technique,” Human Rights Watch is concerned that abusive methods might still be authorized. 
 
Notably, US officials have still refused to publicly denounce waterboarding as torture.

"Although the new executive order bars torture and other abuse, the order still can’t purport to legalize a program that violates basic rights."

Joanne Mariner, terrorism and counterterrorism director at Human Rights Watch


In criticizing the CIA program, Human Rights Watch continued to draw attention to more than three dozen missing CIA detainees. In June, Human Rights Watch and five other human rights groups published a report listing 39 people who were believed to have been held at some time in CIA prisons, and who remain "disappeared". One of the missing detainees, Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, recently reappeared in Pakistan. 
 
“Detainees in CIA custody were in many cases ‘disappeared’ for years,” Mariner said. “Several dozen are still ‘disappeared’ with no information about their fate.” 
 
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has expressed grave concern about the US government’s use of secret CIA prisons to hold suspected terrorists, concluding that detention under such conditions violates the detainees’ basic human rights and is incompatible with international humanitarian law. 

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 904

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 24-07-2007 02:05
If we fail to work within the Geneva Convention, our own laws and basic human rights then the "terrorists" have already won.  
 
Just another example of the government double-speak that we hear so often. One day they say we have to set the example for other countries and at the same time resort to using terrorist tactics by torturing people. Why anyone would want our form of government is beyond me. Our government is corrupt at every level.  
 
Americans get to pick between two people that corporate America has decided will deliver them the highest profits. The fact that the neocons were able to pull of 9/11 and then sell the Bin Laden fairytale to the majority of Americans just shows the level at which the populace has been dumbed down. Legalizing torture and domestic wiretapping was a breeze after that.
Miller
2. 26-07-2007 22:07
The erosion of our freedoms and law errode by the day. In respect to previous mention of illusive Bin Laudin and the fact that there was NEVER a credible investigation into 9/11 and the debunking sources of the conspiricy therorists were (discredited thru possible guilt of associations) from questionable sources. Past statements from BinLaudin\'s tapes stated his tapes would surface less, but from thispoint on the US can only crumble from within. This same theory is what is behind some of the retoric from the words that Iranian prime minister Ahmdinejad has professed also to be the fate of the west and israel. These prophesis do seem to be unfolding looking at the current, edicts if you will, that Bush has been writting out and declaring on public record. All of these actions and words are in themselfs lets say, blowback with the same eventual ovreall effects as droping UD bombs in all the right strategic paces not just in the US but the \"free world\". Many reasons to believe our democratic republic may in fact already be lost, without going into the argument of its long lasting hipocracies and proported faus two party system. These things having been said, one wonders at what point or what it will take to happen to make a final statement that all has been lost, as with the fall of the Soviet Union, or for that matter the Rise of Stalin. That guess may be the historians job. Have we in fact become the very things we have declared to be fighting against thru the last few decades of our recent history.

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  George W. Bush Geneva Conventions Presidential Order CIA Secret Detentions
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: