Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow American's obsession with dominance
Aug 28 2007
American's obsession with dominance | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Ben Tanosborn   

Translation

A swift change from dominance to bullyism

Ben Heine/ MWC NEWS
Ben Heine/ MWC NEWS
I am not a golfer, but my good friend Bill is… has been for years to what many probably consider an addictive level.  I do watch on television, however, occasional PGA and LPGA events since it's the only spectator sport that allows me to feel mentally relaxed and not obliged to maintain some artificial team loyalty.  And, as a bonus, such viewing permits me to multitask; even becomes point of origin for some of my writing.

Last Sunday, Bill invited me to be his guest at the final round of the LPGA Safeway Classic tournament. The ladies were in town, playing at what I've come to call Bill's "alternate residence" or, if you prefer, hangout: Columbia-Edgewater CC.  This annual event provides the Portland married male population a live opportunity to find out what our 39th president, Jimmy Carter, meant by "committing adultery in the heart," for this bevy of talented golfers do an extraordinary job to help choreograph the stage for lust.

But fear not, I won't get into the subject of lust, or a dissertation on why these LPG girls really rock beyond the promotional PR.  Nor is my subject the current top player in women's golf, Lorena Ochoa, the winner this time – her third consecutive victory after the recent crowning as Lady Top Gun.  No, it isn't about this complete individual, athlete as well as person, but rather the level of expectation thrust upon her by those in the media who make a living commenting on the sport: broadcasters and writers of golf.

"A dominant role in international politics could also prove to be greatly beneficial to the social and economic well-being of the world at large, and provide an opportunity to work towards peace and harmony among nations."

It seems that for at least an entire generation these media dedicated hitters, not just in golf but in all broadcasted sports, resort to color commentary all too often made with derogatory brushstrokes on these superstars' ascent to or descent from the very top.  Only when you've been crowned, without possible nearby pretenders, that you are afforded the adulation and regal treatment… but only if you remain distanced from the sport's hoi polloi professionals and stay dominant in the sport.

A local sportswriter told me a few years back, when I asked him about what I interpreted as a changed and jingoistic attitude on the part of sports' commentators during the Summer Olympics, that the American psyche had changed drastically during the 80's, and that sports were simply following the societal model in international politics of winner-take-all, no longer a podium to share with silver and bronze.  According to him, the old American ideal of "pulling for the underdog" had been buried with the advent of the "awakening of America" promulgated during the Reagan years.

A dominant role in a sport like golf could prove to be immensely beneficial for its growth and popularity; that is, when that role is held by someone who not only possesses great skills to master the greens, but also the personal stature to do it with grace and humility.  I have no doubt that Ms. Ochoa will fit the bill in women's golf.

A dominant role in international politics could also prove to be greatly beneficial to the social and economic well-being of the world at large, and provide an opportunity to work towards peace and harmony among nations.  That dominant role was inherited by the United States as the 80's were coming to a close; but, unfortunately, this nation was ill-prepared to assume such responsibility with appropriate grace and humility.  Instead, aided by political bipartisanship, it transformed its acquired dominance into bullyism… elevated to a true moral art form by the Bush administration and the centurions of neoconservatism.

No place has been more obvious in America's attempt for global hegemony than in its dealings with the peoples and nations of the Middle-East: from its clear interference in Lebanon's internal politics, to the genocidal adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq, to the menacing treatment of Syria and Iran, to the bully in-your-face economic punishment of a government democratically elected in Palestine.  Of course, America's meddling in the political affairs of former soviet republics, or the coup against Hugo Chavez in Venezuela (2002), was also par for the course.  The metamorphosis from dominant to bully was swift, requiring a single stage.

However, America's hegemony can no longer be built on the perceived economic or military weaknesses of other nations, not when those perceptions are beginning to be proven wrong.  Both Russia and China are on an international ascending course; China now beginning to flex its economic muscles; and Russia finally ridding itself of the complex it acquired from the breakup of the Soviet empire and its struggle in adopting a new system; an unnecessary struggle for which the US is much to be blamed.  And there are other major nations and regions on that same ascending course.  All of this is concurrently happening as the US appears to the world, economically and militarily, as an overblown bubble ready to burst.

And to think… the United States once had an opportunity to be on top with grace, just like Lorena!

(c) 2007 Ben Tanosborn

Ben Tanosborn an editor of MWC News, after completing graduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), set out for a career in international business that would take him to five continents, expose him to several cultures and make him realize the importance for any and all Americans to become goodwill ambassadors for the United States.
Other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Ben-Tanosborn

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1785

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 31-08-2007 03:45
School yard bully
I have just seen a TV clip where the president of the world, Bush, is starting to lean on Rudd over Iraq , because he has been advised I am sure of a possible change of government. 
He even had the audacity to talk up Howard, he should keep his snout out of Australian politics, but I know he won't. 
The US is in danger of losing what few friends it has. Most folk in the street cannot stand Bush, and that's being polite. 
I agree the US could have been something very special, a true beacon of light, not the dark cloud of aggression it has now become. 
 
Mike
Registered
2. 05-09-2007 10:37
School yard bully
What is so sad is U.S. citizens seem to be doing so little. I read and blog as much as I can, call and write reps in D.C. I forward info for efforts to call or write reps. Seldom recieve anything from others or they acknowledge the ones I have sent. Conversations seem to always hint at others have given up , there is nothing that can be done, hints at the next elections. For me the next elections are to late. The people of the U.S. are so disappointing. And to leave the country one has to ask where, if the industrial nations goverments are basically following suite and support. All of these free countries are loosing their basic freedoms by their own elite influencing and taking control of their goverments. Lead by the U.S. Majority of population of the U.S. are retiremant age. With the push to get people into, 401K\'s stocks for retirement supplementation they have driven another fear into the public. Fear that this war on terror (terror of loosing our standards of living) and its loss would mean to there lives. Cannot speak for the majority but have herd it said maybe the next generation can get it right. To me that means their children and grandchildren. To me they hope this volunteer army and military tech will be able to pull it off. They or those I speak to, never acknowledge any hint we are purposfully creating and aiding in a genocide in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palistine. I try to mention genocide and it not being just accidental side effect from policies. In my anger I may call the \"right\", dumb. I feel they in power on the right and the left are not dumb and the genocide is what the, (elite and their corporations), on all levels, and the goverment want. To me any more it is not just the Bush administration, or Military industrial complex it is the current worlds capitalist complex trying with out to much division, gain control of the energy reserves on the globe. Those energy countries who will not commit to one group or another with their energy reserves are, (according to the statement,\"Your either with us or against us.\" Bush after the trade center bombings puts those who will not sign as applicants for membership, into the axis of evil by reason of noncommitment and participation in energy control and Isreali acknowloedgement. Sadam Hussien threatened to switch to the euro and his past with Bush family, and Iran wanted to stay independant. Both these two countries don\'t play golf, and are not signed onto recognize Isreal as a legitamate world player. I can say no more.
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ben Tanosborn America's obsession Dominance
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: