Home arrow Commentary arrow Daily arrow Transcript: Ahmadinejad's Speech at Columbia University
Sep 25 2007
Transcript: Ahmadinejad's Speech at Columbia University | Print |  E-mail
MWC Corner
By MWC News   
Article Index
Transcript: Ahmadinejad's Speech at Columbia University
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5

Translation

But there are two or three powers that think that they have the right to monopolize all science and knowledge. And they expect the Iranian people, the Iranian nation, to turn to others to get fuel, to get science, to get knowledge that's indigenous to itself, to humble itself. And then they would, of course, refrain from giving it to us, too. So we're quite clear what we need.

If you have created the fifth generation of atomic bombs and are testing them already, what position are you in to question the peaceful purposes of other people who want nuclear power?
We do not believe in nuclear weapons, period. It goes against the whole grain of humanity. So let me just joke -- try to tell a joke here. I think the politicians who are after atomic bombs or are testing them, making them, politically, they are backward, retarded.

QUESTION: Mr. President, a final question. I know your time is short and that you need to move on. Is Iran prepared to open broad discussions with the government of the United States? What would Iran hope to achieve in such discussions? How do you see, in the future, a resolution of the points of conflict between the government of the United States and the government of Iran ?

AHMADINEJAD: From the start, we announced that we are ready to negotiate with all countries. Since 28 years ago, when our revolution succeeded and we established, we took freedom and democracy that was held at by a pro-Western dictatorship. We announced our readiness that besides two countries, we are ready to have friendly relations and talks with all countries of the world.

One of those two was the apartheid regime of South Africa, which has been eliminated. And the second was the Zionist regime. For everybody else around the world, we announced that we want to have friendly, brotherly ties. The Iranian nation is a cultured nation. It is a civilized nation. It seeks -- it wants talks and negotiations.

It's for it.

We believe that in negotiations and talks, everything can be resolved very easily. We don't need threats. We don't need to point bombs or guns. We don't need to get into conflicts if we talk. We have a clear logic about that.

We question the way the world is being run and managed today. We believe that it will not lead to viable peace and security for the world, the way it's run today. We have solutions based on humane values and for relations among states. With the U.S. government, too, we will negotiate -- we don't have any issues about that -- under fair, just circumstances with mutual respect on both sides.

You saw that in order to help the security of Iraq, we had three rounds of talks with the United States, and last year, before coming to New York, I announced that I am ready in the United Nations to engage in a debate with Mr. Bush, the president of the United States, about critical international issues.

So that shows that we want to talk. Having a debate before the all the audience, so the truth is revealed, so that misunderstandings and misperceptions are removed, so that we can find a clear path for brotherly and friendly relations.

I think that if the U.S. administration, if the U.S. government puts aside some of its old behaviors, it can actually be a good friend for the Iranian people, for the Iranian nation.

For 28 years, they've consistently threatened us, insulted us, prevented our scientific development, every day, under one pretext or another.

You all know Saddam, the dictator, was supported by the government of the United States and some European countries in attacking Iran.

And he carried out an eight-year war, a criminal war. Over 200,000 Iranians lost their lives. Over 600,000 Iranians were hurt as a result of the war.

He used chemical weapons. Thousands of Iranians were victims of chemical weapons that he used against us.

Today, Mr. Nobaveh, who is a reporter, an official reporter, international reporter, who was covering U.N. reports in the U.N. for many years, he is one of the victims of the chemical weapons used by Iraq against us.

And since then, we've been under different propaganda, sort of embargoes, economic sanctions, political sanctions. Why? Because we got rid of a dictator? Because we wanted the freedom and democracy that we got for ourselves? That, we can't understand.

We think that if the U.S. government recognizes the rights of the Iranian people, respects all nations and extends a hand of friendship with all Iranians, they, too, will see that Iranians will be one of its best friends.

Would you allow me to thank the audience a moment?

Well, there are many things that I would have liked to cover, but I don't want to take your time any further. I was asked: Would I allow the faculty at Columbia and students here to come to Iran? From this platform, I invite Columbia faculty members and students to come and visit Iran, to speak with our university students. You're officially invited.

University faculty and students that the university decides, or the student associations choose and select are welcome to come. You're welcome to visit any university that you choose inside Iran. We'll provide you with the list of the universities. There are over 400 universities in our country. And you can choose whichever you want to go and visit. We'll give you the platform. We'll respect you 100 percent. We will have our students sit there and listen to you, speak with you, hear what you have to say.

Right now in our universities on a daily basis there are hundreds of meetings like this. They hear, they talk, they ask questions. They welcome it.

In the end I'd like to thank Columbia University. I had heard that many politicians in the United States are trained in Columbia University. And there are many people here who believe in the freedom of speech, in clear, frank conversations.

I do like to extend my gratitude to the managers here in the United States -- at Columbia University, I apologize -- the people who so well organized this meeting today.

I'd like to extend my deepest gratitude to the faculty members and the students here. I ask Almighty God to assist all of us to move hand in hand to establish peace and future filled with friendship and justice and brotherhood.

Best of luck to all of you.

MODERATOR: I'm sorry that President Ahmadinejad's schedule makes it necessary for him to leave before he's been able to answer many of the questions that we have, or even answer some of the ones that we posed to him.

But I think we can all be pleased that his appearance here demonstrates Columbia's deep commitment to free expression and debate.

I want to thank you all for coming to participate.

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 4874

Comments (12)
RSS comments
1. 25-09-2007 19:42
professor of composition and rhetoric
AFter reading the transcript of the Iranian president's speech, I felt somewhat sorry for him --even though I do not endorse his policies. The Persian mode of rhetoric, replete with religious references and Ciceronian complexity, comes across poorly in translation. Secondly, everyone is so fixated on his controversial statements that it is impossible to sift out the strands of legitimate complaints in his perspective on these few issues.
Guest
tarasmit@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Dr. Tara Smith
2. 25-09-2007 23:17
reality
I think that Mr Ahmadinejad said the reality of the world and west must know the every body in every corner of the world knows what is good and what is bad and no body could be decived by propegunda every body knows that US and Uk generated terrorism group and dictator I ask u who generate Taleban? Who do support Sadam? that know by the name of fighting with terrorist every day kill inocent cicilant and weman and childeren in Iraq and Afghanestan
Guest
3. 26-09-2007 07:40
Decorum
I read the transcript on the Washington Post website and was really disappointed by the shrill and condescending tone of Dr. Bollinger's introduction. It's like he had to prove to his friends that he was not a friend of Ahmadinejad.  
 
Like him or not, an invited speaker should be treated with the respect we all should have learned at a young age. 
 
I'm sorry to say that I think Bollinger's lecture backfired, and yielded the high ground to Ahmadinejad, making it easier to be sympathetic to his point of view.
Guest
4. 26-09-2007 09:07
Decorum
Bollinger was obviously going for the sound-bite lines; he could have been critical without descending into name-calling. I agree that he appeared weak rather than courageous by his grand-standing.
Guest
tarasmit@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Dr. Tara Smith
5. 26-09-2007 09:23
My Two Cents
I don't know Dr. Bollinger. I did listen to his introduction of President Ahmadinejad, whom I know very well. 
 
Dr. Bollinger, frustration was understandable if was expressed through questions, not in a power position and certainly not as a head of University which invited this person in the first place. 
 
Having said all, calling Ahmadinejad dictator is lack of knowledge about Iran political hierarchy. President Ahmadinejad does not have any real power in the decision making body of Iranian government. He is not commander in chief, he can not and has no power to choose Iran foreign or domestic policy whatsoever. 
 
He is as much as figure head as President Talebani in Iraq, and even with less power.
Registered
6. 26-09-2007 15:01
10 Questions
Iranian University Chancellors Ask Bollinger 10 Questions  
 
TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Seven chancellors and presidents of Iranian universities and research centers, in a letter addressed to their counterpart in the US Colombia University, denounced Lee Bollinger's insulting words against the Iranian nation and president and invited him to provide responses for 10 questions of the Iranian academicians and intellectuals.  
 
 
 
 
 
The following is the full text of the letter.  
 
Mr. Lee Bollinger  
Columbia University President  
 
We, the professors and heads of universities and research institutions in Tehran , hereby announce our displeasure and protest at your impolite remarks prior to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent speech at Columbia University.  
 
We would like to inform you that President Ahmadinejad was elected directly by the Iranian people through an enthusiastic two-round poll in which almost all of the country's political parties and groups participated. To assess the quality and nature of these elections you may refer to US news reports on the poll dated June 2005.  
 
Your insult, in a scholarly atmosphere, to the president of a country with a population of 72 million and a recorded history of 7,000 years of civilization and culture is deeply shameful.  
 
Your comments, filled with hate and disgust, may well have been influenced by extreme pressure from the media, but it is regrettable that media policy-makers can determine the stance a university president adopts in his speech.  
 
Your remarks about our country included unsubstantiated accusations that were the product of guesswork as well as media propaganda. Some of your claims result from misunderstandings that can be clarified through dialogue and further research.  
 
During his speech, Mr. Ahmadinejad answered a number of your questions and those of students. We are prepared to answer any remaining questions in a scientific, open and direct debate.  
 
You asked the president approximately ten questions. Allow us to ask you ten of our own questions in the hope that your response will help clear the atmosphere of misunderstanding and distrust between our two countries and reveal the truth.  
 
1- Why did the US media put you under so much pressure to prevent Mr. Ahmadinejad from delivering his speech at Columbia University? And why have American TV networks been broadcasting hours of news reports insulting our president while refusing to allow him the opportunity to respond? Is this not against the principle of freedom of speech?  
 
2- Why, in 1953, did the US administration overthrow the Iran's national government under Dr Mohammad Mosaddegh and go on to support the Shah's dictatorship?  
 
3- Why did the US support the blood-thirsty dictator Saddam Hussein during the 1980-88 Iraqi-imposed war on Iran, considering his reckless use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers defending their land and even against his own people?  
 
4- Why is the US putting pressure on the government elected by the majority of Palestinians in Gaza instead of officially recognizing it? And why does it oppose Iran 's proposal to resolve the 60-year-old Palestinian issue through a general referendum?  
 
5- Why has the US military failed to find Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden even with all its advanced equipment? How do you justify the old friendship between the Bush and Bin Laden families and their cooperation on oil deals? How can you justify the Bush administration's efforts to disrupt investigations concerning the September 11 attacks?  
 
6- Why does the US administration support the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) despite the fact that the group has officially and openly accepted the responsibility for numerous deadly bombings and massacres in Iran and Iraq? Why does the US refuse to allow Iran 's current government to act against the MKO's main base in Iraq?  
 
7- Was the US invasion of Iraq based on international consensus and did international institutions support it? What was the real purpose behind the invasion which has claimed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives? Where are the weapons of mass destruction that the US claimed were being stockpiled in Iraq?  
 
8- Why do America's closest allies in the Middle East come from extremely undemocratic governments with absolutist monarchical regimes?  
 
9- Why did the US oppose the plan for a Middle East free of unconventional weapons in the recent session of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors despite the fact the move won the support of all members other than Israel?  
 
10- Why is the US displeased with Iran's agreement with the IAEA and why does it openly oppose any progress in talks between Iran and the agency to resolve the nuclear issue under international law?  
 
Finally, we would like to express our readiness to invite you and other scientific delegations to our country. A trip to Iran would allow you and your colleagues to speak directly with Iranians from all walks of life including intellectuals and university scholars. You could then assess the realities of Iranian society without media censorship before making judgments about the Iranian nation and government.  
 
You can be assured that Iranians are very polite and hospitable toward their guests.
Guest
Shahram
7. 26-09-2007 18:58
10 Questions
President Ahmadinejad invited American university faculty to visit Iranian universities as guests. I am a faculty member of the University of Colorado and am interested in the possibility of being one of those visitors. Does anyone know how these visits will be arranged?Could anyone give me a contact name and email? Tara Smith
Guest
tarasmit@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Tara Smith
8. 26-09-2007 19:05
Dr. Smith
I will contact you with the information as soon as possible 
 
Regards, 
Shahram
Registered
9. 26-09-2007 21:53
Ahmadinejad impressive
I carefully read and re-read the transcript and was impressed with President Ahmadinejad\'s dignity and clarity. 
 
I am an an agnostic humanist and disagree with NOT ONLY President Ahmadinejad but OTHER followers of the Abrahamic religions (Christians, Jews and Muslims) in relation to Gay Rights (they should have FULL rights in my view) and the Death Penalty (it should be abolished in my view). Further, I strongly disapprove of the heavy-handed constraint on humanist political activists in Iran.  
 
However, those matters aside, I found it difficult to disagree with anything he had to say and I have great sympathy for the views expressed by the 10 Iranian Vice Chancellors and the importance of the questions they have asked. 
 
He responded adequately to the canard of Holocaust denial - he clearly stated that this huge historical reality has had a huge, devastating (and unwarranted)impact on the ME - and as with any other matter should be subject to CONTINUING SCIENTIFIC and scholarly scrutiny. [Indeed while I know of the outcomes and fates for immediate members of MY family in the Holocaust there are many un-answered questions about the fate of members of my WIDER family, the reality that like so many PALESTINIANS WE continue to be dispossessed of OUR IDENTIFIABLE land and property, and other aspects of the Holocaust].  
 
Taken at face value from the REALITY of the transcript of President Ahmadinejad\'s words, Iran is not in occupation of any other country; has no aggressive intent to anyone; is an NPT signatory and is opposed to nuclear weapons development; does NOT have nuclear weapons (unlike the US and Apartheid Israel); has every right to nuclear power [although my personal scientific view is that RENEWABLES are the way NOT nuclear]; is cooperating with the IAEA; recently voted YES to an IAEA motion opposing nuclear weapons in the ME (non-NPT Israel and NPT-violating USA voted NO); is NOT involved (unlike the US and Apartheid Israel) in invasion, occupation, devastation,ethnic cleansing and decimation of foreign countries. 
 
Iran has made (and will continue to make) great social, institutional and technological progress DESPITE the US overthrow of democracy -in 1953; the US-backed Shah dictatorship from 1953-1979; the horrendous 1980-1988 US-backed Iraq war on Iran (excess Iranian deaths 2.1 million; see \"Body Count\" via the link below); the 1981 US invasion; Western sanctions; the US occupation and devastation of its neighbours Iraq and Afghanistan; US restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry with devastating effects on Iran and the World - 0.5 million post-2001 world opiate drug-related deaths due to US restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry from 5% of world share in 2001 to 76% in 2002 and 93% in 2007; US-backed Baluchi and other terrorism alluded to in the President\'s speech; and HORRENDOUS threats of miltary attack by the US and Apartheid Israel. 
 
Contrary to the false, obverse view of the Bush-ite Western Mainstream media, President Ahmadinejad comes up smelling of roses compared to the Racist Zionist and Racist Bush-ite liars, war criminals, mass murderers, nuclear terrorists and war-mongers running Apartheid Israel and Bush America, respectively, and their respective Occupied Territories in the US Killing Fields from Somalia to Afghanistan.
Guest
gpolya@optusnet.com.auNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
10. 27-09-2007 08:32
Transcript
When I heard the introduction by Dr. Bollinger of President Ahmadinejad, I was dumbfounded, I could not believe what I was hearing, he disgraced himself and along with himself, I believe, Academic Amerika. This confirmed to me that being intelligent and learned, does not protect one from ones weaknesses and frailties. He should have the courage to let the questions and answers do their work. 
In the transcript President Ahmadinejad, appeared to speak with dignity and clarity, he did himself and his country no disservice , that's more than can be said for Dr. Bollinger. 
There is something else also, and that is the ancient principle of the investment in loss, President Ahmadineja, did it beautifully. It does not matter whether I support what President Ahmadinejad, said or not. Just look at the difference! 
 
Mike
Registered
11. 27-09-2007 14:47
Transcript
Shahram, 
Thank you. May I have your email address? 
 
Tara Smith
Guest
tarasmit@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Tara Smith
12. 27-09-2007 14:57
Transcript
Dr. Smith 
 
I did send you an e-mail last night. If you did not receive that, please use the contact form in this site (you can find it on the top menu) 
 
PS: Just remember it will need confirmation.
Guest
Shahram

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Transcript Ahmadinejad Columbia University


 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: