Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Society arrow The Man Who Bombed Hiroshima
Nov 15 2007
The Man Who Bombed Hiroshima | Print |  E-mail
Society + Culture
By MWC News   

Translation

The Man Who Bombed Hiroshima
By Anthony Gregory

Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr
Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr

The man who flew the plane that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima passed away last week at the age of 92. Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr. did not die from war wounds or violently at the hands of other people, years before his time. He died in hospice care, in a bed, from heart problems and strokes.

In stark contrast, the more than 100,000 civilians who were killed at Hiroshima 62 years ago were burnt, melted, vaporized, in an apocalyptic act of warfare. Many died painful deaths over a period of days or weeks. Others saw family members consumed by flames. Most were far younger than Tibbets was when he finally died. Thousands were children.

Is now the wrong time to discuss this? Tibbets called it a “damn big insult” when a Smithsonian exhibit commemorating Hiroshima’s fiftieth anniversary attempted to capture some of the suffering. If he didn’t think that was the right time for such reflection, then perhaps now is as good as any.

Although he was offended to see the victims remembered, he had said that he meant no insult himself when he reenacted the bombing in Texas in 1976, complete with mushroom cloud. He said he slept fine every night. He consistently affirmed he’d do it all over again.

People disagree on whether the nuking was a war crime. The 1946 Strategic Bombing Survey determined it had been unnecessary to the winning of the war. We know that Japan, demoralized from having dozens of cities obliterated in fire bombings, was extending peace feelers. “The Japanese were ready to surrender,” said Dwight Eisenhower, who as a general during that war believed the atom bomb was “completely unnecessary.” Admiral William D. Leahy, General Douglas MacArthur, and many other high officials at the time agreed.

Japan wanted only to keep its emperor. Understandably, the nation feared the consequences of the unconditional surrender that Truman and the Allies demanded. They had reason to fear brutalities exceeding the very harsh treatment of Germany under the Versailles Treaty after World War I, which had come after a mere conditional surrender.

Some have tried to rewrite history and have said that to win the war without nuclear weapons, the U.S. would have had to invade and suffer intolerable losses, that the atomic bomb “saved a million lives.” But there is no reason to doubt that Japan’s cause was lost by mid-1945—even without an invasion. Practically every major city was destroyed. The people were blockaded and starving. Then, perhaps as a show of strength to Stalin, the U.S. government nuked two of Japan’s remaining cities, introducing nuclear warfare to the world, and ultimately, allowed the Japanese to keep their emperor anyway.

Robert McNamara, who worked with Curtis LeMay in planning the pre-Hiroshima fire bombings of Japan, admitted in recent years that he and LeMay were acting as “war criminals.” Does this term apply to Tibbets?

We know Tibbets did not shy away from personal responsibility. He proudly took credit for planning the nuclear attack.

This raises uncomfortable questions: If your government orders you to slaughter tens of thousands of defenseless men, women, and children, to whom and to what do you owe your loyalty? If you’re willing to take credit for your supposed acts of wartime heroism, should you also be ready to accept blame if it turns out you committed an atrocity?

Some might say it’s insensitive to ask now whether Tibbets was a war criminal. Indeed, there is no need to condemn this man upon his passing. Even if he was guilty of a war crime, he is now beyond the reaches of human justice.

But it remains crucial for us to consider the implications of what he did. It is important to our sense of individual responsibility in a world where, especially in times of war, people think mainly in terms of the collective. It is this fallacy in moral reasoning that leads otherwise decent people to commit unspeakable barbarities against their fellow man.

We must not lose track of the individual’s role, even in the chaos of war. For whatever we think of Tibbets, it is the refusal to view people as individuals, the branding of everyone as merely an expendable part of a larger group, which brought about the atomic bombings and so many other horrors of World War II.

Anthony Gregory is a Research Analyst at The Independent Institute. He earned his bachelor's degree in American history from the University of California at Berkeley and gave the undergraduate history commencement speech in 2003. In addition to his work with the Independent Institute, he regularly writes for numerous news and commentary web sites, including LewRockwell.com, Future of Freedom Foundation, and the Rational Review.


This_Category
Category:: Society + Culture

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1252

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 16-11-2007 11:36
Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr is in no way or should ever be considered a war criminal for dropping the bomb. He was solider in the army air corps performing his duty. If that bomb had not been dropped, the war would have lasted many more years, you must remember the code of honor the Japanese had, that code would not let then surrender, and the invasion of Japan would have been bloody battle would have caused over a million deaths. The bombing of Japan through air raids had already caused more destruction and death then the two bombs combined. 
I remember a story that I was told about what happened after the war. After WW 2 many soldiers were given college education provided by the US government. A group of soldiers sat in class, though the type of class I cannot remember, and the teacher gave the soldiers reasons why the bomb should not have been dropped and told them to write an essay on it. When the teacher got the essays back saw that of the papers said that the bomb should have been dropped, he asked the soldiers why they had written that when he gave them reasons why the bomb shouldn't have been dropped. The soldiers answered "you weren't there".
Guest
2. 16-11-2007 14:36
"If that bomb had not been dropped, the war would have lasted many more years, you must remember the code of honor the Japanese had, that code would not let then surrender, and the invasion of Japan would have been bloody battle would have caused over a million deaths. The bombing of Japan through air raids had already caused more destruction and death then the two bombs combined. " 
Not true. The Japanese were willing to surrender prior to dropping the bomb with the condition that their Emperor remain. The Allies demanded unconditional surrender. The treaty signed allowed the Emperor to remain... Use of atomic bombs is senseless murder. Tibbets was doing his job and didn't know the full consequences of his actions. I would hope that NO person ever accept orders to drop an atomic bomb on civilians. Google it. For further reading google Truman's diaries...
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Anthony Gregory Paul Tibbets Hiroshima
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: