Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Politic arrow He’s the One: A Vote for John Edwards
Jan 07 2008
He’s the One: A Vote for John Edwards | Print |  E-mail
Political Views
By Walter A Davis   

Translation
Image

He’s the One: A Vote for John Edwards

      My title, of course, is a reference to Oprah’s Messianic endorsement of Barack Obama at a South Carolina rally.  Media politics in its theological phase.  Not sure but perhaps she thought she was proclaiming the Second Coming of Jesus and not just another fatally compromised politician. But there is good news of something new under the political sun.  John Edwards is the real deal and is saying things no mainline American candidate has said since FDR.  Edwards’ evolution is the story of this election—and not surprisingly the one that the mainstream media insist on marginalizing.  (Or worse, doing to Edwards what they did to Howard Dean.  Good old Novak has even accused Edwards of screaming for class warfare. If the Ned Beatty character from the great film Network were around he’d accuse John of something even worse: “of tampering with the fundamental order of things.”  For Edwards is going right for the jugular: the corporate structure in its control of both parties and the media. 

      Obama talks about Hope as if politics is all about getting us all to feel a certain way.  His is a purely rhetorical campaign without any content.  There was a wonderful Ad many years ago in which a delightful old woman (named Clara Peller) took a bite out of a McDonald’s then said “where’s the Beef?”   But that’s why an ideology of something as amorphous as Hope is so Mcsorry.  It creates what people come to think are their deepest needs. In our time of course just about everything is about celebrity and feeling good.  No wonder Obama has such support among younger voters.  They’ve never had anything but a diet of feel good redemption.Image

      There is one clear thing about Obama.  He’s an enigma.  And thus for many a worthwhile gamble.  As Obama tells us repeatedly he wants to bring everyone to the table. (Or to translate: corporate amerika please let me have a seat at the table.) Paul Krugman has demonstrated the fallacy of this strategy, but that may be beside the point now.  Obama may be unstoppable.  If so our task is to win John Edwards a seat at the table and assure that his voice will become Obama’s conscience and keep pressuring him leftward. Obama is extending a warm hand to everyone else: to all the members of the corporate oligarchy.  What we must do is secure a place for John Edwards at that table.  That is why the Edwards campaign must go on all the way through the entire primary process.  After all, it still could happen.  Obama could stumble.  And John Edwards—well for me it is impossible to listen to him without being moved to tears.  I didn’t think someone like John Edwards was possible.  He is a remarkable voice.

      A final contrast that Mr Obama could with benefit ponder.  Early in his career Obama worked for an organization in Chicago started by the great community activist Saul Alinsky.  “Rub raw the sores of discontent.”  That was Alinsky’s rhetorical motto. For ethical reasons: helping people discover the truth about their situation is the basis of all progressive politics.  All this hope stuff, in contrast, is the new opiate.  John Edwards not Barack Obama is the successor of Alinsky.  He knows that what we need is the painful truth.  Then action.  Hope—that’s what we can feel perhaps way down the line.  Or discover that we don’t need such amorphous feelings because we’ve found something far more valuable.  To use the term on everyone’s lips (even Huckabee’s), we’ll have found a way to make Change.

      In that spirit I’m proud finally to have in John Edwards a politician I can support. I urge all of you to do likewise.  In every way you can.  As you all know, Edwards has refused all money from lobbyists and PACs. That’s another way in which his is a campaign of the people.  Tirelessly so.  I don’t think the man sleeps.  And now every time he opens his mouth he says things that no other politician dares to say.  There is indeed something new under the sun.  And come to think of it I guess that’s a hopeful thing. 

Walter A. Davis, Professor Emeritus, Ohio State University www.walteradavis.com


This_Category
Category:: Political Views

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1302

Comments (14)
RSS comments
1. 07-01-2008 14:51
Great piece
Can I post this piece on progressive blogs around the web?
Guest
2. 07-01-2008 16:25
Great piece
John Edwards is the most viable candidate in the democratic party to beat a republican in Nov. Sure, Obama and Clinton have star power (shhhh! because they are a black man and a woman) and don't forget Oprah. I say Edwards/Obama is the winning ticket. Combined, they've got enough experience. But not too much to be corrupt (Clinton). Also, Edwards can capture the southern /rural/heartland vote (important) and Obama would capture, the right/left coast liberals, young people, women, and the black vote. Together, they could do alot of good and turn this country around.
Guest
3. 07-01-2008 23:06
Graduate Student
I have to disagree. John Edwards is filthy rich and he did not get that way by being the progressive he claims to be. He started running on Dennis Kucinich platform and issues when he saw that it was working. No way I trust this person. Its Kucinich who voted against the war, patriot act, universal health care. Edwards plan is putitive and still feeds the insurance companies much like the AARP want him to. In fact Kucinich was not invited to the AARP debate, Edwards was because he does not have a health care plan like the Kucinich/Conyers plan. 
Vote Kucinich, end of story.
Guest
4. 07-01-2008 23:39
I agree with #3. Graduate Students Comme
John Edwards lied on a YouTube video when he said: 
"I'm proud to say I'm the only candidate, either Republican or Democrat that is endorsing a Universal Healthcare plan". I found out on the Kucinich Forum when I mentioned this in a post that Edwards also said that in a debate and then Dennis said: "That's not true". We've had 8 long years of a lying President - isn't that enough? Edwards is eyeball deep with the establishment elite. He's a member of the Council on Foriegn Relations along with Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Texaco, Mobile and Exxon Valdez. John Edwards is not a Progressive, he's a phoney and a liar.  
 
Clinton, Obama, Edwards, they're all in the same club. They said in a debate a while back that they could not guarantee the US troops would be out of Iraq by 2013!!! Go read the speeches Clinton, Obama, and Edwards gave over at the CFR (go to the CFR website). All three say the same bull$h1+. 
:(  
I will not be voting for anyone else but Dennis Kucinich in the upcoming elections. He is not Corporate Owned and Bossed. :)
Guest
susanlynnrapp@yahoo.comNOSPAM! ">Susan For Kucinich
5. 07-01-2008 23:50
I agree with #3. Graduate Students Comme
If Edwards is a progressive then I'm the messiah.
Guest
Ty
6. 08-01-2008 00:57
Edwards progressive?
:( Sorry, John is too deep in the money to be believable. Talks a good line but I think he's an intended distraction. Only Dennis Kucinich is unbought and has been speaking a consistant, clear message for years. Though he may be walking into the den of lions, he is unafraid. We can & should do no less as "winter patriots". The goat dance must end. Our planet and humanity's survival in an acceptable form is at stake. 
 
Vote your conscience & self interest FOR THE LONG TERM. Forget those quarterly P&L statements and those dwindling dividend checks. 
Peace, Rog
Guest
7. 08-01-2008 02:05
Edwards is the faux populist, playing hi
Edwards is running as the populist candidate…yet…he is on record as having taken almost $500,000 in 2005-06 for “consulting” – actually attending a few meetings, he has taken $165,000 in campaign contributions from Fortress IG “employees” and I have read that he has much of his personal fortune invested with Fortress, about $16 million. 
Fortress Investment Group is a combo of a hedge fund and private equity firm; I’ve read it facilitates offshore banking operations for its investors as a “tax haven.” 
Fortress IG and Edwards is described this way: 
“presumably well known to Edwards as a result of his well-paid advising and his massive investment in Fortress. It includes companies from a variety of industries, creating all sorts of conflicts of interest for a would-be public official. Just in the 'A's in the list we find: Advanced Medical Optics Inc., and Applera Corp. (medical); Aetna Inc., Amerigroup Corp., and Assurant Inc. (health insurance); Abbott Labs, Alpharma Inc., and Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (pharmaceuticals); Altria Group (parent of Phillip Morris, cigarettes); American International Group (insurance); Amgen Inc. (biotech); Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Apache Corp., Arena Resources Inc., Atlas America Inc., Atmos Energy Corp., and Avista Corp. (oil and gas); Autonation Inc. (cars); Anheuser Busch Cos. Inc. (beer), and many others.  
Glancing through the full alphabet of companies, it is immediately apparent that Fortress represents the polar opposite of an ethical investment opportunity. Some names jump out at you as surprising companies for a Democratic presidential candidate to sink his fortune into, such as Wal Mart Stores Inc. There are a lot of telecom companies, like Verizon, in the list, lots of oil companies like Exxon Mobil, weapons companies like Lockheed Martin, big agricultural companies like Monsanto, a great many lending companies including several well known for predatory lending practices such as Wells Fargo, and numerous media corporations including Clear Channel.  
Edwards has refused to take part in a debate run by Fox News, but has sunk his money into Clear Channel. 
Fortress has also been a leading investor in companies privatizing prisons: http://www.secinfo.com/dsVsf.6eZq.b.htm” 
Source: http://www.davidswanson.org/?q=node/865
Guest
Scott Gregory
8. 08-01-2008 02:14
comment #3 is right!
Edwards is in no way free of corporate influences. The only truly progressive candidate is Dennis Kucinich. Not only do Edwards' positions fall far short of Dennis', Dennis really IS free of corporate influence. Dennis Kucinich belongs to the American people and if you want a progressive Democratic president HE is the only candidate who deserves your vote. 
I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, Walter Davis, and assuming that you didn't know about Dennis when you wrote this article...
Guest
9. 08-01-2008 07:30
Progressively Treva
Unfortunately, we progressives have our work cut out for us where defining what a true progressive is. 
Edwards is not a real progressive. He is a typical politician. He serves his corporate sponsors. He is connected to the Bilderberg Group. He has profited through predatory lending with his connections to a Wall Street Hedge Fund, Fortress Investment Group. Think of John Edwards when you see empty houses with for-sale signs and recall the outrageously high rend and price tags on housing, which contributed to homelessness in this country. 
I'm for the true progressive candidate. Dennis Kucinich. I'll gladly explain what a real progressive is.
Guest
Treva
10. 08-01-2008 13:58
Dear Kucinich Supporters
"Dear Kucinich Supporters, My essay on Edwards was in terms of the idea that politics is the art of the possible. Were I writing from the point ofview of theory I would be talking about Karl Marx, not Dennis 
Kucinich.  
 
Or: in terms of the political system we have (which I wish were overthrown and know that won't happen) Edwards is the best we can get (aswas FDR) and actually has a chance. And he has now said enough that he will 
have to support the policies he's running on. "
Guest
davis.65@osu.eduNOSPAM! ">walter a davis
11. 08-01-2008 20:42
Dear Kucinich Supporters
John Edwards doesn't get the air time that Obama gets and even Brian Williams said the other day that the media needs to take responsibility for what happens because they have a tendency to give AIR time to the front runners and help that along without giving equal time to ALL runners. Obama most likely received some financial backing from Oprah which doesn't hurt. I would still rather see Edwards.
Guest
Greenartist
12. 09-01-2008 00:12
Dear Kucinich Supporters
Gosh Walter A. Davis, besides your heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, etc., you are just filled with self-fullfilling prophecies, aren't you? :upset Since you've decided that the Corporate Fascist slip slide this country is on can not be changed, why even bother writing an essay at all?  
Excuse me sir, but Dennis Kucinich is alot more than just a theory. Theories don't survive 40 years in politics. Dennis still has hope for this country, you don't. I still have hope for this country, I'm voting for Dennis. :)
Guest
susanlynnrapp@yahoo.comNOSPAM! ">Susan For Kucinich
13. 09-01-2008 02:28
re=Susan For Kucinich
Quote:
 
Since you've decided that the Corporate Fascist slip slide this country is on can not be changed, why even bother writing an essay at all?

 
 
The last time I checked, I was the managing editor of MWC- 
 
I personally respect and admire Congressman Kucinich, work and efforts but I also think he is much better and more useful in Congress than the white house. 
 
Nevertheless, no matter how one may feel about the reality on the ground and chances of candidates. One thing it must be respected here and that is everyone are free to support or not to support a candidate.
Registered
14. 09-01-2008 02:50
re=Susan For Kucinich
I'd pick Edwards over Hillary or Obama.
Guest
Bill

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Walter A. Davis Walter Davis John Edwards Barack Obama Oprah
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar