Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Politic arrow Lou Dobbs and the Drug War
Jan 22 2008
Lou Dobbs and the Drug War | Print |  E-mail
Political Views
By MWC News   

Translation
Image

Lou Dobbs and the Drug War
by Jacob G. Hornberger

Last night, CNN television commentator Lou Dobbs was commenting on the recent death of a Border Patrol agent at the hands of drug dealers along the border. The agent had used his vehicle to try to stop the Hummer that was being driven by the drug dealers. The drug dealers crashed into the agent’s vehicle, killing him, and then drove the Hummer back into Mexico where they escaped capture.

Dobbs blamed the deaths on the drug dealers and the so-called open-border policy of the U.S. government, which is one of his favorite rants.

What Dobbs fails to comprehend, however, is that he himself, along with other supporters of the war on drugs, are morally responsible for the death of that Border Patrol agent. That is, Dobbs and other drug-war supporters cannot escape moral responsibility for the agent’s death by simply pointing to the legal (and moral) responsibility of the drug dealers who killed him.

"Dobbs and his drug-war cohorts just cannot let go of their beloved war, not even when it has gone on for more than three decades, with nothing but death, destruction, corruption, and failure to show for it."

If the drug war had been ended years ago, as libertarians have long advocated, there would be no more drug gangs and drug lords. Those types of people survive and prosper only in black markets, not regular markets. If drugs were legalized, the people selling drugs would be pharmacies and other normally operating businesses, just as they were before U.S. officials made the sale and distribution of drugs illegal.

By putting drug gangs and drug lords out of business immediately, the legalization of drugs would obviously cause the types of occurrences that resulted in that Border Patrol’s death to immediately disappear. That is, there wouldn’t be drug gangs trying to smuggle drugs into the United States because, again, there wouldn’t be any more drug gangs. Given that there wouldn’t have been any more drug gangs, there wouldn’t have been the altercation that resulted in the Border Patrol agent’s death.

Yet, Dobbs and his drug-war cohorts just cannot let go of their beloved war, not even when it has gone on for more than three decades, with nothing but death, destruction, corruption, and failure to show for it. Even worse, they cannot bring themselves to take personal responsibility for its consequences. Like liberals and the welfare state, they inevitably exclaim, “Please, judge us by our good intentions, not by the actual results of our philosophy.”

Why do people like Dobbs continue to favor the drug war? Hope springs eternal in the minds of people who favor paternalistic government programs, whether the program is the drug war, Social Security, Medicare, immigration controls, trade protectionism, or the like. Despite all the crises, messes, and perversions that such programs produce year after year, decade after decade, their advocates continue to hope that some day an enterprising politician and bureaucrat will finally make them succeed.

But they will never succeed, at least not without a police state imposed within our country.

Look at North Korea and how it has sealed its borders. They’ll never admit it openly, but that is effectively the model of those who wish to seal the borders of the United States.

Look at the Berlin Wall. They’ll never admit it openly, but that is effectively the model of those who wish to build a wall along our Southern border.

Look at Cuba and its retirement, educational, and health care systems. They’ll never admit it, but that is effectively the model of those who wish that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and public schooling could finally be made to work.

What’s the alternative to socialism, interventionism, and a police state? Free markets, private property, and limited government, as libertarians have long maintained. Echoing the words of Ronald Reagan, libertarians exclaim, “Tear down these walls!”

Unfortunately, as a conservative Dobbs cannot bring himself to embrace free markets, private property, and limited government in the areas of trade, immigration, retirement, health care, and education. But wouldn’t it be nice if he, along with other conservatives and liberals, would take personal responsibility for the consequences of their beloved government programs. Taking moral responsibility for the death of that Border Patrol agent who died at the hands of drug dealers — and apologizing to his family — would be a good place to start.

Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

This_Category
Category:: Political Views

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 2728

Comments (8)
RSS comments
1. 22-01-2008 20:15
Berlin Wall Mexican Wall, Do good fences
While I personally find Lou Dobbs to be a major distraction from the real criminals that should have their mugs continually displayed before the public. Drugs should simply be made legal to the point that they are in other socialist oriented countries. As for the border patrols and walls, these bring up pictures of history past were they were used more for keeping people in than keeping them out. Just where is the U.S. headed? Dobbs embracing free markets at least, he certainly dose that for his boss Mr. Murdoch, round about, focus Bush, mxicans, he allows the real criminals of the market system to escape the publics eye, as is evidenced in wall streets record breaking profits and billions in tax breaks, which they would have more of under a libertarian far right rule. Giving Reagan credit for the fall of the Berlin wall was one of Regans greatest acting achievments. The fact of the matter is , (as we in the U.S. and the capitalist endeavor are about to find out) the USSR fell because for one it was always a more poor country, and its military industrial complex had grown to such exhorbitant unsustainable size. The Marxist movement was corrupted by Stalinism and thus communism. The partial failures of the social programs in the US could be also blamed in part by the coruption of the market system to see that they don\\\'t work for the markets own benefits, or faulter. The partial failures of the social systems quoted could also be made in part do to their infancy begginings and the corrupt capitalist efforts to bring them down in thier infancy. Case in point and truth be known, John Negroponte, under the Nixonn and Regan administration and the horrors of CIA and goverment overthrow that they inflicted on democracies that leaned to the left in Central and South America. This is the legacy of blow back that we have created and inherited from Reganomics. As for the Berlin wall it came down from a over extended Military Industrial Complex that refused to give up the gun and took the entire USSR down with it. Failure of communism? Or it took it with it in its courupt and capitalistic way of the so called elite or corrupt factions of the USSR. The extreme right of Libertarianism can be just as scary with its return of the states power and thus maybe the return of the KKK, and other racist organizations with abuse to minorities, possibly this time even womens right to choose. Ron Pauls popularity is steming out of the innability of the anti war and anti imperialism movement to gain any true momentum or voice, he offers this. But it is arguable if libertarianism is gaining ground because of its other far right additives, apaartied type sounthern school systems, also economic factors would allow inequalities towards the workers inflicted by corporation profit motives to flourish even further. In respect to Ron Paul people should remember he voted for the Afghan War, he dose not support impeachment of Bush, he has had some very racist articles published in his name that he claims he was unaware of, with so many this seems to be a bit of a dodge. This is not to change the subject but only to have the subject reader think and investigate the stories in these trouble information twisted times, in regards to libertarianism. Will we be stuck with the choices of the best of three evils?
Guest
2. 22-01-2008 20:52
Berlin Wall Mexican Wall, Do good fences
I believe there is censorship on a major scale at all news media outlets concerning this issue.  
 
I have posted end the drug war comments relating to the economy and such on various websites including cnn msnbc etc. I get good reactions and debates then mysteriously my posts and any that agreed with me are quickly removed.  
 
We need a major effort to post on major news media sites and blogs and such about this issue. I know if there is an actual discussion of issues our points will be heard. 
 
The drug war has destroyed this country and continues to. Media outlets are in cohorts with drug companies etc and it goes on and on. 
 
We need to post continually on various sites so our voices will be heard loud and clear. 
 
stay on topic post facts and be polite, fight fire with fire and eventually this war will be ended.
Guest
3. 23-01-2008 04:29
Hookah
The other day when I was in the local bay side public park, there were two Arab looking gentle men sitting back in their folding chairs smoking their hookahs, what they were smoking, no idea, myself and my wife could not care less, nor any one else, no police, just people minding their own business. The fellow next door to me often grows a small crop of hash, he grows good pumpkins as well well. Me I prefer growing vegetables and fruit. In Australia growing hash is a state thing, small crops for personal use is allowed in some states, it has become very grey. The righteous, religious right make a big thing about recreational drugs. 
Yet this country has a booze culture, but I don't think the alcohol industry,or the tobacco industry have much to fear from the right of our federal or local politics.  
 
Mike
Registered
4. 23-01-2008 23:41
Insanity
We\'ve all heard the definition of Insanity; doing the same thing over & over and expecting different results....the Drug War precisely!  
We were so close to decriminalizing pot up here in Canada a decade ago but the political pressure from the US continues to influence our weak, equally stupid politicians. The pressure has never been greater than now, as american DEA seeks to extradite our citizen for the sale of seeds. They want to put him away in a jail somewhere for life. For SEEDS! Thats right, this is just a plant. All natural. No drug companies concoction. No chemicals put together in a meth house. Just a beautiful Green plant with hundreds of uses beyond pleasure. 
All drugs decriminalized is a big stretch for people right now but if we can at least get the benign marijuana out of the gansters hands, then enforcement can focus on real crime and we\'ll save society alot of money.
Guest
travelon@shaw.caNOSPAM! ">Keith Davenport
5. 25-01-2008 02:44
The Mobs
Yes Keith, after all didn't prohibition give the US mobs a big leg up. When I mention growing fruit and vegetables,(my hobby), and I grow rare fruit, and one of my most delicious fruits that I grow, has narcotic bark and leaves on the tree, horticulturists, would know it. But I ain't going to tell the religious right fruit cakes about it, because the would want to chop it down. I am only interested in eating the fruit.  
It must be hard living next door to the US. 
 
Mike
Registered
6. 25-01-2008 07:59
Tear that wall down we have others to bu
I find the drug war to be at a dead end street except were our prison population is concerned, and peoples lives have been ruined in many cases over small offenses. Mr Hornberrger seems to be trying to make numerous other points that I think are linked to freedom discussions, yet in his misrepresented examples he discredits himself, adn to me distracts from his main argument. During Reagans two terms. Hundreds of thousands where tortured. Jean Kirkpatrick advised the Reagan administration to undo the human rights programs that Carter had initiated and spoke instead of the true nature of politics that was based on "competition for power", and that "brute force" was often better than "human reason". This rationalized such things as the dictatorships death squads-because "salvadors political culture respected a sovreign who was willing to wield violence". America then painted itself as the vanguard against the evil empire of the Soviet Union and this was used as an excuse to legitemize the brutal opposition to third world nationalism. In countries like El salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua, the United States did not make the same mistake as they did in Vietnam. Instead they "outsourced" their army and by supporting local bad boys let death squads do their dirty work. The idea of "going primitive" was implemented in these conflicts, where the most brutal crimes against human rights imaginable where committed. Now some of these poor people our our illegal immigrants ironically. Dose this ring a bell any where today with U.S. policy and its outsourcing. As far as socialism failure and using the Cuban example one must also bring up the failures of Europes examples of socialism hardly, Canada\'s and Venezuala newer socialistic capitalism, it will be Chavezes free enterprize and underground U.S. cia or gov backing that will spoil his socialistic efforts and undo him before all is said and done. Ungoverned free enterprize tends to want to keep the supressed supressed, as history has shown. I was beginning to lean toward favoring Ron Paul but the more I review this article the farther away I move from that idea. The arrogance of the Bush administration seems to reach over and bleed into the supporters of libertarian retoric that I am finding to be a turn off, dispite my hatred of the M.E. wars. Maybe some new info will come in to change my mind before November, fixing the Diebol voting machines would be encouraging. While I am sure the Christian right has a slap handed opinion on drugs I never got that much of a voiced opinion from them here in the U.S. on drugs as much as they speak out against drinking and gambeling.
Guest
7. 02-02-2008 19:07
Lou Dobbs for Prez
This comment was removed, 
 
Admin 
========== 
Guest
tlllllllllllllll@aol.comNOSPAM! ">llllllllllllllllllll
8. 07-04-2008 16:50
drugs
Lou, Please reconsider your opposition to legalization of Marijuana. The boarders are crumbling,with fairly large amounts of marijuana passing without police objection. Obviously, then the market in the U.S. exists; the populist has spoken. Dont\'t waste anymore tax dollars fighting,! CHANGE! Legalize Marijuana.
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Jacob G. Hornberger CNN Lou Dobbs Drug War
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: