Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Time to put the anti war rhetoric on hold
Feb 03 2008
Time to put the anti war rhetoric on hold | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Bob Boldt   

Translation

Time to put the anti war rhetoric on hold Image

In spite of promises, I seriously doubt that either of the remaining two presidential candidates for the Democratic Party and a Democratic majority congress will in fact end the Iraq war.

There are just too many powerful war mongering forces aligned against any lacking the courage to resist them and there are many powerful forces both Democratic and Republican, corporate and in the media still profiting from the war, regardless of its unbearable cost to the American taxpayer.

HillBillery or Obama may morph the war considerably, but they will not end it. I haven't heard about their positions lately, but to my knowledge, only Edwards was loudly and publicly for abandoning our permanent Crusader Castles in Iraq. Both remaining candidates will only admit to being lukewarm in their desire to take a first strike nuclear attack against Iran off the negotiating table.

If either had even the slightest realization of what is gravely at stake for humanity and our moral position in the world, he/she would begin and end every speech with a demand that Bush immediately repudiate any US use of nuclear weaponry, period.

If I have learned anything in the last eight years it is that hoping for any substantive foreign policy change from either of our two Democratic presidential hopefuls will be asking for a broken heart. Just look at their foreign policy advisers: Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeleine Albright. Has anyone ever come up with a more certain formula for same ol' same ol'?

I am hoping for a surprise, but bear in mind I do not have the required lung capacity to hold my breath that long. I would also advise my comrades in the Peace movement to save their breath on the issue of war and peace. We need to shelve our differences with the Democrats now over the War in Iraq in particular and foreign policy in general.

Harassing them over their pro war positions will only loose the election. This is an election no American can afford to lose. First we must secure our democracy at home. Then perhaps. at a later date, we can attack both the Democrats and the Republicans over their shared shame.

I would rather challenge a Clinton or an Obama on foreign policy issues while standing in the open, storm trooper free street than challenge a McCain or a Huckabee from a cozy prison cell. I think I am not being overly dramatic if I say these are the stakes in the upcoming presidential election.

Image 

On the domestic front, I do hope that the American People on the evening of the inauguration of a Democratic president will awaken as if from a bad dream or from some evil magician's magic spell. They will cast off the horror and brutality that has so frightened us for these long eight years and begin to rebuild.

The economic and social scars will last unto the seventh generation, but knowing the nightmare is over will give us hope. I would remind us all again that this will only apply to our domestic affairs: things such as health care, a roll back of theocracy, privatization and No Child Left Behind.

Our precious environment may possibly have a champion to defend her from the corporate rapists and the rule of the powerful K Street lobbyist may even be challenged. (Do not expect either candidate to ever criticize anything Israel does however or oppose the AIPAC.) At least we stand a chance under the Democrats to have again a president who listens and not a petty tyrant who rules.

I will be working my butt off for whomever the nominee is (including Hillary) in hopes of turning back the reign of domestic terror promulgated by Bushco. Like the proverbial frog in the incrementally heated pot, we have seen the slow erosion of nearly all our freedoms under the lies and obfuscations of this band of Republican criminals.

All I hope for this election, which I hope will return the Democrats to power, is some attempt to restore a semblance of domestic tranquility and a repeal of the police state we have so come to accept in this country.

Many have been so terrified by the bogeyman of an al Qaeda fiend under every bed that it may be impossible to ever return them to sanity. Even now many remain so brainwashed and traumatized by the Red Scare of the McCarthy era prior to the demise of the USSR that, not infrequently, a right wing talk host or two will involuntarily refer to someone as a "dirty Commie."

For the rest of us, terrorism hopefully will return to the manageable scope it merits: a domestic and international law enforcement issue. Who knows, someday we may be able to wear shoes again while passing through our airports and even pack mouthwash.

If this does not take place, if we get one of the certifiable loonies on the Republican ticket or if the Democratic president fails to roll back Bush's Third Reich, then I guarantee I will be the first to put down the pen and pick up the sword. Our national history of foreign Imperial brutality has always been resolutely bipartisan.

The Democrats however have usually stood for human rights and the rule of law within our borders. I am not denying some notable exceptions here. If this time they (the Democrats) refuse to turn back Bush's perniciousness, It will be time for a true, violent revolution. We are just too far down the road to fascism. Any arguments?

As Martin Luther King, quoting Robert Kennedy, said, "Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable."

These words have never been more relevant than now.

This upcoming election is literally a matter of life or death.

The situation is so dire.

Peace (I hope)

Robert Boldt an editor of MWC News, is a freelance film/video producer living in Jefferson City, Missouri. He is active in local politics, worked on the Howard Dean and John Kerry campaigns and is a cofounder of The White Rose Collective. Articles by Bob Boldt at MWC News http://mwcnews.net/bob-boldt 

This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 2778

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 03-02-2008 19:11
Obama's advisers may be "same old" but Dr. Brzezinski was one of the only foreign policy heavyweights in the US to stand up against an Iraq invasion from the beginning. He also has a detailed plan to withdraw forces with no permanent bases left behind. Clinton's advisers though were war supporters and have not been as forthcoming about getting out.
2. 04-02-2008 17:31
scientology
mrshark@shark.comNOSPAM! ">Mr. shark
3. 06-02-2008 18:53
Rhetoric...
Thanks hawkinsb23. It makes me feel a little better about supporting Obama. Let's hope that after the Party Convention I don't have to similarly fish around for reasons to support HilBillary. :cry  
 
...and mrshark: Scientology? 
did anyone else fail to grasp the reference? 
 
Peace, 
 
Bob
deboldt@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Bob Boldt
4. 07-02-2008 20:19
Rhetoric...
This article is so true. Hilary and Obama will not stop teh military industrial complex or the wall street globalization control nuts who want oil control. Sad even by the time the Nov election how many more genocidal numbers in Afghanistn and Iraq? While the majority of people continue to blindly follow where the billionaires want the election to go. Those in the lead offer only a differance in tactics to world domination trough oil control. As far as Brezeziski please take note and research his book "The Grand Chessboard" He has spoken out against the administration only on some tactics, but he advocates a very siminlar world domination policy as the PGNAC advocates. The money behind the two democrates is not to end the genocide for oil to control the globalization markets war. It is to try to take a slightly differant approach and to suppress further anti war activities. A demnocrate will give the illusion that this will stop, yet if on listens to what they are saying, (both) it is to continue a world military presance of over 700 military bases we currently support. The real change advocates have droped out leaving only Ron Paul, who one has to agree with the rest of his policies that would mean a possible return further racism and the old southern ways that still in the back ground. He would deffinatley have trouble pulling the ethnic minorities vote.
5. 07-02-2008 20:54
Rhetoric...
Unfortunately I must ad, that centrist democrates will not give much change. The financial powers that be, are moving the U.S. and even the big nato countries towards market control endevors. Look who (countries)are backing the war efforts. Look at how left leaning countries are electing to the right, ex. (France Canada). The international bankers and corporations are pushing to make power grabs for oil. Weather fair elections are happening I cannot say. But they are seeing to it that leaders are coming into power to support U.S. agression and polices. Market control and U.S. military industrial complex powers, basically the same beast that has grown out of capitalism as in pre WWI and WWII. To pay for the war they are stripping away at various pools of money, one in goverment, is social programs. Continueing to get 401K promoted and people dependant on the markets, who in turn want profits and global market controls. Presidential canidates leading are the worst. Those who might have offered a chance with the current 2 party system have dropped out. Ron Paul will close the military bases down, but how about S.S. and medicare he denounces, returning power to the states? We need more social and efficient goverment with more accountability. How far back can we turn the clock that is practicle in these complex troubled times.

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Bob Boldt Clinton Obama anti war Democratic Party HillBillery McCain Huckabee
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: