Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Why Not Abolish the Fed?
Feb 04 2008
Why Not Abolish the Fed? | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By MWC News   

Translation

Why Not Abolish the Fed?Image
by Jacob G. Hornberger

One of the positions of Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul that mainstream pundits find "wacky" is his call to abolish the Federal Reserve System. Never mind that two Nobel Prize-winning economists -- both libertarians -- called for the same thing.

And never mind that the Fed is the entity directly responsible for the debasement of the dollar over the many decades since the Fed was established.

Both Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek called for the abolition of the Fed during their careers. While Friedman spent much of his life advocating externally imposed constraints on the Fed's power to expand the money supply, his first wish was to have the Fed abolished, as he pointed out in a 1995 Reason magazine interview. In his book Denationalisation of Money: An Analysis of the Theory and Practise of Concurrent Currencies, Hayek advocated a free-market monetary system of competing currencies.

Most Americans probably still believe that the Great Depression was caused by "the failure of the free-enterprise system." It is a false belief. The truth is that the worst economic disaster in American history was caused by the Federal Reserve. Give current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke credit for publicly acknowledging that fact in a speech delivered in 2002 commemorating Friedman's 90th birthday.

Throughout the ages, the favorite political trick for public officials has been to dole out "free benefits" to the citizenry and engage in expensive foreign military adventures without raising taxes. To accomplish this feat, they have simply resorted to the printing press to get the money to pay for the "free benefits" and the military adventures. As more money was printed, its value would drop, which would be reflected in rising prices for the things that money buys. As prices rose, people would blame speculators, capitalists, price-gougers, and profiteers, never suspecting that their public officials were behind the scam.

That's what the Fed has been doing for decades -- accommodating ever-increasing government expenditures by printing the money to pay for them. That's why the value of the dollar has been plummeting ever since the 1930s. It's also why U.S. coins are now made of cheap alloys rather than of gold and silver. As the value of precious metals rose in response to an ever-depreciating currency, the value of the precious metals in coins became greater than the face value of the coins, encouraging people to hoard the coins or even melt them down for the metal. That's what Gresham's Law in economics is all about -- that bad money (i.e., depreciating money) inevitably drives good money out of circulation.

For decades, U.S. officials made it a felony offense for Americans to own gold. Why did they do that? To prevent Americans from protecting themselves from a constantly depreciating currency. Equally important, the price of gold has always been an easy way to gauge what politicians are doing to the money. They have never liked that.

What the Fed has done to our money over the decades should not surprise anyone. After all, the Federal Reserve is nothing more than a central-planning agency in the classic socialist mold. Just like the central-planning boards in the Soviet Union and communist China, the Fed is composed of a central board of bureaucratic appointees planning, in a top-down fashion, complex monetary matters affecting millions of economic participants under constantly changing conditions. Given the inherent defects of socialist central planning, why would anyone expect anything but bad and perverse results from monetary central planning?

As Friedman and Hayek and other free-market economists (most notably Ludwig von Mises) pointed out, the Federal Reserve is the prime destroyer of currency and, therefore, one of the greatest threats to the freedom and well-being of a citizenry. As the monetary crisis facing our country continues to worsen, it's important that we keep in mind that there is only one long-term solution -- the one advocated by people such as Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul and Nobel Laureates Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek: Abolish the Fed.

Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation (www.fff.org).

This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 20722

Comments (4)
RSS comments
1. 07-02-2008 14:16
Too bad the marxist revolution was corrupted by the Rothchilds financing Stalin, betraying that great minded social movement. And the U.S. financing Hitlers rise to power thru its banking system. Corruption seems to be waiting at every turn to keep so many enslaved by undermining the working mans endeavors to create some sort of its own, home grown reality and bartering system. GREED
Guest
2. 20-02-2008 14:42
Not that I am going to change the mind of someone who is a president of their own libertarian think tank, but Harvard would like a word with you. 
 
I agree that the Fed has been less than stellar in practice, but a regulatory monetary body is not bad in theory. Without such an authority, the burden for moving America out of a recession (or worse) is placed on Congress, which we ALL know of course to be a shining beacon of swift, intelligent efficiency. 
 
Likely, we should all press for some significant reform within the Fed, but like many libertarian ideas, its abolition goes about three steps beyond pragmatism.
Guest
Sean
3. 20-02-2008 17:57
Interesting write-up. Thanks for sharing these informative and important points. I support Ron Paul, and I think it's good for people to understand these concepts.
Guest
codymckibb@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Cody McKibben
4. 21-02-2008 06:56
Poppycock
This ancient retread of bogus wisdom has circulated in the so-called libertarian world forever it seems like. It is wrong, and it is a foolish assertion.  
 
"Money" is created wholesale and at will by private banks, in order to make interest on an asset that has no natural basis - i.e. "make money out of thin air." This is called the fractional reserve system, and has absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with government benefits.  
 
Please people - - do some homework.
Guest
arcturas1951@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">Reginald Monserat

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Jacob G. Hornberger Republican presidential Ron Paul Federal Reserve System Milton Friedman Friedrich Hayek
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: