Judge Smacks Down Bush's Cruel Move Against Whales

If asked to name the central hallmark of the Bush presidency as it enters its eighth and---may God grant us--final year, I'd say without hesitation, one word.

Cruelty.

More than anything else, the Bush tenure has been marked by cruelty. What else can explain the unrelenting thumb-or is it his middle finger-in the eyes of peace advocates, environmentalists, diplomats, human rights organizations, and all the frogs, polar bears, whales, Muslims, Christians, women, soldiers and emotionally deranged prisoners Bush has effectively-sometimes explicitly-executed without just cause.

Everything Bush does smells either explicitly cruel or informed by an inability to feel the sufferings of others. He invokes fear over and over, appealing again and again to the darkness in our hearts in order to make end runs around legitimate process.

And so it was again, Tuesday, Jan. 15, when Bush announced that he was granting waivers that would allow the Navy to continue using sonar in densely populated ocean canyons and other shallow water migration paths off the coast of Southern California, in violation of court orders designed to protect whales and dolphins from bleeding ears, brain damage and other bad effects of sonar.

Yesterday, Feb. 5, a judge in California smacked down the Bush waivers, charging that Bush had over-reached in making the case for waiving such restrictions. Read about it here.

So what was the Bush justification for inflicting pain and disorientation on whales?

Why, "urgent national security reasons," of course. What else? You see, the Navy is busy fine-tuning its anti-submarine warfare techniques, in order to prevent an imminent. threat.

Just whose submarines are posing a threat?

No telling. Considering that we're spreading weapons around the world at a record pace. As Maureen Dowd wrote recently, "Blessed is the peacemaker who comes bearing a $30 billion package of military aid for Israel and a $20 billion package of Humvees and guided bombs for the Arabs," referring to Bush's tour of the Middle East last month on behalf of peace dontcha know?

The trip was marked by Bush's beating the drums for some kind of stern action against Israel, while pressing a thumb in the eyes of his own spy agencies which announced late last year that Iran was no where near developing nukes.

But then, Bush has never been one to let reality get in the way of his need to punish others, whether it meant covering up the truth about global warming, the effects of mountaintop removal on our springs and rivers and their teeming wildlife or old-growth forests in the Northwest.

In looking back at his strange and illustrious career, the evidence is everywhere that Bush is motivated by a cruel streak above all.

As a child, he used to stuff firecrackers in the mouths of frogs, light them, and then toss them into the air to watch them explode, according to childhood witnesses quoted in an article by Nicholas Kristof in the May 21, 2000, edition of the New York Times.

Such evidence, buried deep in puff-piece stories, should have been warnings to us all. You don't put animal abusers in top positions of power. Many an expert on human behavior will tell you that animal torture is indicative of deep mental disturbances that can surface as public or private dramas years later. Others address such issues more simply.

"Deliberate cruelty is not forgivable," Tennessee Williams wrote.

Evidence suggests the people in charge of our country and our world are either guilty of deliberate cruelty or else they're just incapable of empathy. How else do you explain our network of secret prisons complete with water boards, ceiling restraints, whipping wires, attack dogs, electrodes, and worse? How else do you explain efforts to legitimize such instruments during the past seven years, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that they're counter-productive?

Research it yourself. Look up Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi. The lies we forced that mentally deranged man to tell during "aggressive interrogation" became a centerpiece in our case for the bombing, invasion and occupation of Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of corpses later, Congress shamelessly rubberstamped such techniques.

Cruetly? Lack of empathy?

How else do you explain photographs of Condoleezza Rice laughing and joking with the leader of Israel even as his American-made missiles were reducing much of Lebanon to rubble a couple of years back?

During Bush's short tenure as governor of Texas he oversaw the execution of 131 inmates, more than any other governor since capital punishment was made legal again in 1978.

According to the June 11, 2000, Chicago Tribune, these included "inmates whose cases were compromised by unreliable evidence, disbarred or suspended defense attorneys, meager defense efforts during sentencing and dubious psychiatric testimony." According to the Boston Globe they included the mentally retarded, the mentally deranged, the abused, the coerced and the born again. Quite probably they included innocent people.

O.K., maybe you see capital punishment as a necessary evil. Unfortunately, your president took a rather less thoughtful attitude toward it. Consider this piece of witnessing by conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Bush for Talk Magazine in September 1999.

"In the weeks before the execution, Bush says, a number of protesters came to Austin to demand clemency for Karla Faye Tucker. 'Did you meet with any of them?' I ask.

"Bush whips around and stares at me. 'No, I didn't meet with any of them,' he snaps, as though I've just asked the dumbest, most offensive question ever posed. 'I didn't meet with Larry King either when he came down for it. I watched his interview with Tucker, though. He asked her real difficult questions like, 'What would you
say to Governor Bush?'

"'What was her answer?' I wonder.

"'Please,' Bush whimpers, his lips pursed in mock desperation. 'Don't kill me.'

"I must look shocked-ridiculing the pleas of a condemned prisoner who has since been executed seems odd and cruel-because he immediately stops smirking."

Recommend this article...

Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:

Comments (1)

Write Comment

Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:
Comment:
Code:*
	I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4