Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Deselecting The Democrats
Feb 06 2008
Deselecting The Democrats | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Bob Boldt   

Translation

Deselecting The Democrats Image

I will never forgive the main stream media (MSM) for the transparently flagrant "selection" actions they have taken during the primaries. The certainly of my conviction on this is modified by two factors:

First I have not followed the campaigns and the debates with enough enthusiasm or interest to make my knowledge at all comprehensive. And second, I have heard few others on the left make this argument in quite this way.

I do not believe the media and their corporate masters have exerted nearly the same degree of selection on the Republican side of the campaigns and in the debates that they have made on their Democratic counterparts. I'm sure they think the Republicans are pretty much their boys and when one of them does come to power, he will behave in a manner favorable to their interests.

They even feel safe enough not to deselect Ron Paul because his views will have no influence on the Party platform and he has been quite successfully marginalized, in spite a late groundswell of popular support. They know that the voice of the people is of secondary consideration to the Republicans anyway. By now everyone knows popular opinion is something to be manipulated, not listened to.

If there is any selection going on here it may be in the form of encouraging the candidacy of John McCain over Huckabee and Romney, two pretty well certifiable loony theocrats. Old John does have a proven track record of selling out on important issues and is more likely to be able to be manipulated by corporate interests than a couple of self confessed religious zealots.

In the case of the Democrats, it seems to be a different story altogether. First of all, Dennis Kucinich was pretty successfully ignored by the press, both on the campaign trail and even in the debates. I did hear that he was asked some pretty serious questions concerning flying saucers.

When poor Dennis failed to get the message to just shut up and go away, they merely excluded him from the debates altogether. Now why didn't they just give him the Ron Paul treatment and let him bounce along at the end of the train like some hapless caboose?

Unlike Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich is the genuine conscience of his Party. I am a little surprised no cartoonist has yet portrayed him as Jiminy Cricket sitting on the shoulder of a long nosed Bill or Hillary Clinton. I guess the reference is just too archaic. He was right about the war, he is right on health care, corporate influence on the government and a host of other important issues.

The thing the MSM cannot tolerate is that Dennis does have the ear of the progressives and the Dean liberals in the Party... the very people who could be influential in drafting the Party platform and relentlessly browbeating the remaining two candidates not to ignore their promises when nominated. I am not sure how sincere Edwards was about really ending the war, but I did know Kucinich was. Kucinich read the same papers critical of a preemptive strike on Iraq and the WMD, that John Edwards and Hillary Clinton ignored.

Kucinich is someone the big defense contractors will not tolerate. By now, most people pretty much accept that the reason for our continued presence in Iraq is somehow tied up with big oil. I think that at least a second big reason is nothing more or less than literally to transfer money from the Treasury to the corporations, like Raytheon/General Electric, KB&R, etc, etc. The most efficient way to do this is through defense related contracts. War is the ultimate consumer activity. The product is immensely expensive and is consumed utterly. Image

Everyone is in on this game: all the Republicans (except of course Ron Paul) and nearly all the Democrats. Toward the end, I was beginning to think Edwards didn't buy the corporate game. I think this may have played the biggest part in his deselection by the press.

I do believe that the American public is finally beginning to get wise to the shell game that has been going on lo these many generations. The war profiteering, the health care scam and the welfare for the rich in the form of these tax cuts have been conducted with such flagrant impunity by the Bushies that only a blind, def, and dumb one could fail to notice. Of course any Republican President can be expected to keep this scam going at the present rate of speed.

Only a Democrat can stand a chance of at least trying to roll it back to a less obvious pre Bush level. This possibility, literally scares the shit out of the corporate power structure, their MSM enablers and the army of government officials and office holders on the payroll. No one ever gives up power voluntarily and they are not about to do so now. That is why I find comments like Wolf Blitzer's as reported in Common Dreams News Center, Rich Media, Poor Debates by Jamison Foser.

There will be an increased attempt to dilute and deflect any message the Democrats make concerning a more equitable distribution of wealth, a roll back of Defense and any attempt to go against the pharmaceutical/medical establishment.

Now that the primary "deselection" process is complete, I believe the process of the deselection of the Democrats themselves will really begin in earnest.

As I said, my reflections on this matter are based solely upon only the most superficial analysis of the MSM news and the media in general. In this time when everyone is glued to the TV for the latest election results and news of Britney, I am disconnecting even further from the great electronic teat. Like Plato's Caveman/Philosopher, I find my only salvation is to pull away from these tantalizing, shadowy images on the screen cast by even deeper illusions and head toward the light...

Robert Boldt an editor of MWC News, is a freelance film/video producer living in Jefferson City, Missouri. He is active in local politics, worked on the Howard Dean and John Kerry campaigns and is a cofounder of The White Rose Collective. Articles by Bob Boldt at MWC News http://mwcnews.net/bob-boldt 

This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1053

Comments (3)
RSS comments
1. 06-02-2008 23:43
Just The Surface
Dear Editor, 
 
I really enjoyed your article and I must warn you that you are just "scratching" the surface of what a LOT of conspiracy theorists have been screaming about now for a few years. The government has been controlling the MSM for it's own purposes, mainly disinformation propaganda. Kucinich told us "impeach now" and that we were being lied to about "9/11" by the Bush admin. They HAD to get him off everyone's TV. The American people must realize that we only vote for the people that the corporations have chosen. In this way, they give us the illusion of a "fair" election. In reality, it's JUST MORE SPIN. Welcome to fascism America.
2. 08-02-2008 02:07
Just The Surface
I support Kucinich's words 100 percent, eh, or nearly so. He has to know impeachment won't go thru. The democrates continue to fund the war and bring it up for vote when they have teh control of the floor. Kucinich during one debate was asked would he back who ever the party nominated, he said only if they were against the war. He has asked his followers to back Obama, who in his speech in St. Louis said he is for a strong military, most people do not know what that intails. He is for protecting Americas interests around the globe, he will not be so dictator like in his actions as Bush. But the major money behind both Clinton and Obama speaks volumes. Corparate global interests will be protected. Kucinich was anti war last time yet he endorsed Kerry definately a pro war canidate. I seriously question Kucinich's sincerity or is he a mouth piece to keep the left movement from moving more left. As long as people think they have a voice or are being represented, then they accept the process, which stays centrist. As we are told that is what and how the american people are, and afraid of drastic change, so only a middle man can get in. Really? Listen to the words of John Kennedy's inaugural address, and to what he is saying. Those are not centrist ideas, nor were his brothers. Examining the military industrial complexes corporate ties and globalization, one sees the need for party control on both sides of the isle. Diane Fienstiens husband, major in leading corp. for production of military weapons. One of Obama's major contributors medical and pharmaceutical corps. Try as I may not to get into this election, I am pulled. Only hoping to at least stop the genocide in Afghanistan and Iraq.
3. 08-02-2008 05:01
Just The Surface
Spot on. 
 
Kucinich was somewhaht taken aback when asked that scurrilous UFO question by Tim Russert. 
 
If he'd expected the question he could have shot right back: 
 
"Yes, I did see a UFO, and if I see another one that will even up the score with Ronald Reagan, who, as you must know, reported seeing two."
tomhagan@alum.mit.eduNOSPAM! ">Tom Hagan

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Bob Boldt Ron Paul Dennis Kucinich Democrats
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: