Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Society arrow Monsanto's Udder Disgrace
Feb 07 2008
Monsanto's Udder Disgrace | Print |  E-mail
Society + Culture
By Rosemarie Jackowski   

Translation

Monsanto's Udder DisgraceImage

Some might say that Monsanto is more of a threat than al-Qaida, but I won't say that. I remember the track record of Monsanto when it comes to seeking revenge against anyone who is critical of Monsanto's corporate policies. I won't say that I feel compassion for those who have been injured by Monsanto. I won't say that cows suffer painful mastitis because of injections of Monsanto's BGH.

I won't say that Canadian farmer Percy Schmiester deserves support because of what Monsanto did to him. Schmeister was sued by Monsanto. In fact, so many farmers have been sued by Monsanto that a national hotline was set up to assist them.

I won't say that Monsanto puts profits ahead of the health of all of us. I won't say any of these things because I don't have enough money to wage a legal defense against the giant Monsanto. In this land of  free speech, sometimes only those with power and wealth have freedom of speech.

What I will say is that, in my opinion, what Monsanto is doing to Ben & Jerry's is an udder disgrace. Monsanto, known for its strong-arm legal tactics, is opposing the labeling of ice cream. Why would Monsanto want information withheld from consumers? It's all about money. Allowing consumers to have the facts could affect the corporation's bottom line. BGH, otherwise known as Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone, is a drug developed to increase bovine milk production. Ben & Jerry's is fighting for the right to continue to label ice cream that is made with milk from BGH-free cows.

The food chain is under worldwide assault by U.S. corporations. The Master Race of corporations has seized control of the very essence of life itself. We are now in the age of Genetically Modified Doomsday Seeds. Why has there been no public discussion on who should have control of the planetary gene pool?

I applaud vegans. They have reached a higher moral plane than the rest of us; but even they are at risk of Monsantoitis. They must be vigilant if they want to avoid GMOs and "Roundup Ready" soy products.

It must be emphasized that all in this article is just my opinion - no Monsanto Process Servers knocking on my door, please.

I vaguely remember, a few years back, Monsanto ran the most oppressive lobbying campaign in the history of the State of Vermont. The crux of the controversy was the labeling of milk - not exactly nuclear physics or brain surgery. Some citizens and members of the State Legislature thought that it was a good idea to indicate on the label if milk came from cows that had not been injected with Monsanto's money-making BGH. This would allow consumers the freedom to make an informed choice in the super market. Monsanto's position, which was supported by the USDA - no surprise there- was that consumers did not have the right to that information.

The milk labeling controversy - and other corporate practices of Monsanto - have been issues for years. For a while every time I saw my Senator, I would greet him with the same comment, "Hey Bernie, when are you going to do something about Monsanto?" Senator Bernie would shake his head and raise his hands in frustration.

I often heard him say that no matter how bad you think things are in Washington, they are really much worse. While the Congress is distracted with growth hormones taken by sports figures, our farm animals are being abused with other hormones. Baseball players have a free choice. Cows don't.

The current attack by the giant Monsanto on our beloved Ben & Jerry's shows the dark underside of the corporate culture.  Monsanto should back off. They should keep their drugs out of our cows and keep their hands off our ice cream. Is there nothing sacred. Do they have no shame! This is the stuff of summer time picnics, church socials, and children's birthday parties. Sometimes it is only ice cream that can put a smile on the face of Grandpa. Ice cream - the magic potion that was fed to kids in the old days to soothe painful throats after tonsillectomies.

Giant corporations intent on waging battles against the little guys should chill out. It's time for  those corporate execs to feast on some Chunky Monkey or maybe a little Cherry Garcia. It just might be the perfect medicine to soothe the savage beast inside their desolate corporate souls.

Rosemarie Jackowski is an advocacy journalist living in the USA. She was arrested, tried, and convicted for her participation in a peaceful protest of the war. The conviction was appealed and overturned in the State Supreme Court. The government then announced plans to retry the case. Finally, after years of legal proceedings, all charges were dropped. She can be reached at: dissent[at]sover.net Articles by Rosemarie Jackowski at MWC News http://mwcnews.net/rosemarie-jackowski 

This_Category
Category:: Society + Culture

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1397

Comments (6)
RSS comments
1. 08-02-2008 02:38
Scare
Rosemarie, 
Sometimes you scare me with the stuff you dig up, (I think there is a pun there). 
We are very selective in what we buy for consumption, (GMO free, no additives etc.). 
I grow a heck of a lot of my fruit and vegetables, organically. Of course many cannot, but people could grow spuds in a tub, strawberries in a pot, pull out their ornamentals, plant pretty bushes and trees that bear fruit, aim at an edible landscape. 
I suppose the corporations would object, and try to interfere with that also. 
Also has any OZ readers any information on the subject matter of Rosemarie\'s article. I might forward your article if I may, to Senator Bob Brown , the head of the Greens. 
 
Mike
Registered
2. 08-02-2008 15:29
EVERYONE SHOULD BE SCARED
Thanks, Mike for your kind comments. I am receiving a lot of nice e-mails on this article - some from farmers. Yes, everyone who is able should be growing their own food. For many that is not an option.  
I have been following the agriculture story since the 70s when so many family farms were lost because of the collusion between the banking industry and the government. I said then, that allowing the nation's food supply to be controlled by large corporations was one of the biggest strategic mistakes that could be made. It has put our national security at risk - not as a threat from other nations - but as a threat from U$A corporations. 
There is a lot of information about Monsanto on the Internet. I believe, for many reasons, that it is one of the most dangerous corporations on the planet. Yes, please forward the article.
Guest
dissent@sover.netNOSPAM! ">rosemarie jackowski
3. 08-02-2008 23:24
EVERYONE SHOULD BE SCARED
Scientists Estimate That Pesticides are Reducing Crop Yields by ONE-THIRD Through Impaired Nitrogen Fixation - July 2007  
Drawing on their recent work and other published studies, the team projected that pesticides and other contaminants are reducing plant yield by one-third as a result of impaired SNF. This remarkable conclusion suggests one mechanism, or explanation of the yield-enhancing benefits of well-managed, long-term organic farming systems. http://www.organic-center.org/science.hot.php?action=view&report_id=99  
Furthermore this is all about monopoly not science : 
 
On 17th December 2007 Monsanto was found guilty of contempt of the South African Advertising Authority (ASA) for publishing false claims about the safety of GM foods. 
 
In January,2007, Monsanto was fined 15,000 euros (US$19,000 ) in a French court for misleading the public about the environmental impact of herbicide Roundup. 
 
A former chairman of Monsanto Agriculture France was found guilty of false advertising for presenting Roundup as biodegradable and claiming that it left the soil clean after use. Monsanto's French distributor Scotts France was also fined 15,000 euros.  
 
In 2005 Monsanto was caught smuggling South African produced GM Bollgard cotton seed into Indonesia disguised as rice. Monsanto was fined for bribing Indonesian officials. 
 
In 2006 Monsanto suppressed evidence of serious damage to the liver and kidneys of rats in their MON 863 GM maize trials until ordered to release this evidence by a German Court. 
 
In June, 2007, a second peer-reviewed case involving another variation of Monsanto's GM maize, namely, NK 603, has been shown by studies to be potentially toxic to humans. NK 603 has been approved for food, feed, processing, and propagation in Europe and the Philippines The new research, carried out by the French scientific research institute CRIGEN, involves biotech firm Monsanto's NK 603 GMO corn (marketed commercially under the name Round-up Ready). 
 
Rats that were fed GM maize showed significant differences in measurements, as well as significant weight differences compared to those fed with normal maize. Almost 70 statistically significant differences were observed and reported - 12 for hematology parameters, 18 for clinical chemistry parameters, nine for urine chemistry parameters, six for the organ weights (brain, heart, liver), 14 for body weights and body weight changes, and eight for food consumption. toxicity, The most alarming was the diminished brain size. Scientists warned that diminished brain size sent out a urgent danger warning for growing children fed `GM food.
Guest
njarchive@cox.netNOSPAM! ">IssueTalk
4. 09-02-2008 19:44
njarchive
Thank you for all of the additional information.
Guest
dissent@sover.netNOSPAM! ">rosemarie jackowski
5. 10-02-2008 23:45
njarchive
AND...there's been a move to grain feed beef in China: great TV coverage and some enthusiastic farmer touting how his cows will be better now, better beef, better milkers. Hmm...didn't all this hoopla in the States begin with grain feeding? Why is Japanese beef better? Surely not because it\'s naturally grazed. Surely, too, Japan is udderly stupid not to allow US beef into its country post Mad Cow Disease Scare (that was never fixed, only hushed up)!
Guest
6. 11-02-2008 18:41
njarchive
Jim...you bring up another good point. The case of Creekstone Farms vs the USA FDA. Creekstone wanted to test its own cows at its own expense so that Japan would import them. The FDA would NOT allow it. This is consistent with the government policy that the health of the people is not to be considered when it comes to testing for BSE. The FDA bowed down to the lobbying of others in the industry who do not want any testing.  
The Cattlemen's Association wields a lot of power. Remember what they did to Oprah just because she said that she would not eat another hamburger?
Guest
dissent@sover.netNOSPAM! ">rosemarie jackowski

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Rosemarie Jackowski Canadian farmer Percy Schmiester Monsanto
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: