Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Another village idiot for the presidency?
Feb 16 2008
Another village idiot for the presidency? | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Ben Tanosborn   

Translation
Image

Neither the best, nor the brightest

It must have been Harry S. Truman, the plainest amongst our plain presidents, who scared us all into having idiots running our government by saying: "Whenever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship."  Of course, he failed to acknowledge the possibility that we could have the worst of both worlds: inefficient government and dictatorship.  And at this moment, we seem to be marching in step to get there soon. 

Are our nation's best and brightest so repulsed by the bureaucracy in the public sector that decidedly prefer to take up arms running the predatory wing of the private sector?

Maybe some of the "brightest" are doing that, but they cannot also be called "best" while allowing themselves to be corrupted by a heartless capitalism equally ready to reward its bright leaders as it is to deny countless people from sharing the economic trough.

"Americans have done it in the past… so why not again?  I mean… elect the village idiot to be mayor… well, president and CINC for this US-village we live in.  No disrespect intended, not for the sake of disrespect; certainly not by simply calling a dumb ass who aspires to be America's supreme leader by a first, middle and last name, all in one.  And every village, we are told, is expected, certainly entitled, to have one.  An idiot, that is!"

It does look more and more as if both public and private sectors are being ran by the very same gang of thieves, all operating from a single "carnivalesque" den, where the larcenous elite pick the lazy, career-politicians as their lead carneys for deceit.  And these lead carneys are seldom the brightest, and definitely never the best! 

Americans have done it in the past… so why not again?  I mean… elect the village idiot to be mayor… well, president and CINC for this US-village we live in.  No disrespect intended, not for the sake of disrespect; certainly not by simply calling a dumb ass who aspires to be America's supreme leader by a first, middle and last name, all in one.  And every village, we are told, is expected, certainly entitled, to have one.  An idiot, that is!

One would think that hitting on nine out of ten prognostications would make most of us who are humility-challenged, a bit giddy zigzagging in haughty satisfaction; almost as if invited to a seminar conducted, ex officio, by none other than Nostradamus – in spirit, of course.  But to me, this nine out of ten "good guesses" that I've attained during this past year lose any and all merit when the error, the incredible miss, involves the man of the hour, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the soon-to-be standard bearer for the GOP in the coming presidential election.  And that's how I messed up, big time, when last May in one of my columns I prematurely called this politician a has-been, and laid to rest his presidential ambitions with an obituary that read R.I.W. (Rest in War) instead of R.I.P. 

Foolish me!  Of all the predictions I've made throughout the years, this one I thought to be a cinch, a sure thing… an "almost-certainty" with an infinitesimal margin of error.  I was almost embarrassed to even consider it a prediction instead of a factoid.  Pleassse! How can the Grand Old Party consent to be represented by anyone like John McCain… a person irrelevant in just about every aspect of the party's conservative tradition; a true morbid warmonger just like the present occupant of the White House; a phony funny-racist; an inarticulate man… one lacking minimal brain power?  How, may I ask?

Could it be that Americans prefer not to have anyone smarter than their surrounding mediocrity leading them?  Or that after having been submerged at the bottom of iniquity with George W. Bush for eight years, we might fee the need for a decompression stop presidency before our nation resurfaces without suffering from the bends? Nonsense… a McCain presidency would be no different from a Bush's third term… equal opportunity idiocy, and more thieveries of the filthy, or cleanly, rich.

One cannot fathom McCain as the next president of the United States… the new scorn of the gooks and their new replacements, the terrorist Islamo-fascists! Not this burnt scrap from the bottom of Annapolis' kettle.  But then again, Americans more often than not seem to side with the perceived underdog, particularly when seen as a hero-patriot, and it would be hard to find a greater underdog than the village idiot.

Don't count McCain out… at least for now!  It's an indisputable fact that in America, money is total power, and at the end of the day power always grabs the reins.

(c) 2008 Ben Tanosborn

Ben Tanosborn an editor of MWC News, after completing graduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), set out for a career in international business that would take him to five continents, expose him to several cultures and make him realize the importance for any and all Americans to become goodwill ambassadors for the United States.
Other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Ben-Tanosborn

This_Category
Category:: Editorial

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1845

Comments (3)
RSS comments
1. 16-02-2008 18:07
Sheeple
Right you are! 
 
McCain's their man. He has caved and compromised on so many issues it is a wonder he doesn't have a coin slot on his forehead. Bush's endorsement makes him his heir apparent - the inheritor, supporter and sustainer of all the crimes and blunders of the last village idiot.  
 
I predict a major incident after the primaries and before the election that will cause a rally around the flag and a shoe in for the Repug presidential candidate. It’s a proven strategy for sheep herding. This will most likely come as a nuclear attack on Iran.  
 
This morning I heard Rush predict that neither Clinton nor Obama will end the war in Iraq - on the slim chance they are elected. Sad to say, for once, I agree with the old ditto-head guru.
Guest
deboldt@gmail.comNOSPAM! ">Bob Boldt
2. 17-02-2008 09:56
From the Show Me State
Someone , please show me how any of the 3 leading contenders have any intention to change the military agression and U.S.(elite-sorry have to say it), interests. In this area, (war), the only one to offer a change is Ron Paul, and then one has to agree with the rest of the Libertarian agenda, which I personally do not. Obama using Bzezinsky, author of the Grand Chess Board a rerun of the PNAC on slightly differant forum??? Hilary with her hands in the pockets of Warren Buffet and Murdoch. Not to mention, what would have to be done to clean up Congress and the Senate. With efforts being steped up in Afghanistan, the blood baths they must be imposing on that population and god knows what in Iraq. Escalation by Nato and hints moving into Darfur, and Iran threats. With all that work left to be done, its a shame Bush has to leave his prize to some one else, only slightly less or more qualified to take over. By choosing such a poor GOP they just help to ensure the other party victory. Could this be to intentionally be giving false hope? To the world at least allowing them escalation from now til the election, and after if need be. I am sure the E.U. and our other allies populations, are watching and hoping a party change will offer a change. Because the Democrats have just been getting bullied, so just playing politics til they get in, they will then do a 180???
Guest
SJ
3. 18-02-2008 09:15
Truman Wasn't So Bright Either
Harry Truman only became president upon FDR's death because he was such a constant pain with his poking about inside the war machine looking for that very profitable graft and corruption. He fell for the blandishments of those who wanted him out of their nefarious affairs and accepted "the call" to be VP even though FDR didn't want him. 
 
After FDR died, Truman was handled like the puppet he was intended to be. His razor-thin election in 1948 was a reflection that the American people understood that Truman wasn't his own man. It was only close because they also understood that Dewey wasn't his own man either. People then had to make the choice of the lesser of two evils, and by a narrow margin chose the one they knew. 
 
It appears to me that this election is another of those. For too many people, McCain will represent the Bush evil they know. They will vote for him rather than risk the Hillary female evil winning, or possibly having the non-pure-Caucasian Obama become president. The future frightens them, and they would rather bury us in the past than risk losing an imaginary total control.
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ben Tanosborn Harry S. Truman John McCain US presidency
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar