Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Beware an Attack on Iran
Mar 17 2008
Beware an Attack on Iran | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Marjorie Cohn   

Translation

Beware an Attack on Iran Image

Is the Bush administration ramping up for an attack on Iran?  The signs seem to point in that direction.  On March 11, Navy Adm. William Fallon, commander of the U.S. forces in the Middle East, retired early because of differences with Washington on Iran policy.  And now, Dick Cheney's current Middle East tour may be designed to prepare our Arab allies for an imminent "preemptive" war against Iran.

Bush and Cheney have long been rattling the sabers in Iran's direction.  The disaster they created in Iraq isn't going well, no matter how they spin it.  They may feel that engaging the United States militarily in Iran would make it harder to elect anyone other than the seasoned military man, John McCain. The Republican presidential candidate just happens to be touring Iraq with Sen. Joe Lieberman, one of the strongest advocates of a U.S. military strike on Iran.  Lieberman is likely on McCain's short list for a vice-presidential running mate.

Admiral Fallon took early retirement after making comments that contradicted the Bush administration's aggressive stance on Iran. Fallon told the Arab television station Al Jazeera last fall that a "constant drumbeat of conflict" from the administration against Iran was "not helpful and not useful."  After Fallon announced his retirement, the New York Times reported a senior administration official as saying Fallon's comments about U.S. Iran policy "left the perception he had a different foreign policy than the president."  If Fallon wants to talk to Iran rather than attack it, then his policy differs from Bush's.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, however, has downplayed the significance of Admiral Fallon's abrupt retirement. Admiral Mullen proclaimed recently, "In my view, this should not be seen as a sign – at all – towards any kind of conflict with Iran." Perhaps the chairman doth protest too much.

The White House has been spewing pugilistic rhetoric toward Iran. In spite of the unanimous conclusion of the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies that Iran is not developing nukes, Bush immediately declared, "I have said Iran is dangerous, and the NIE estimate doesn't do anything to change my opinion about the danger Iran poses to the world - quite the contrary."  (See here).

News reports on Monday announced that Dick Cheney is on a surprise weeklong visit to Iraq, Israel, the occupied Palestinian territories, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Turkey.  High on Cheney's agenda is the topic of U.S. policy toward Iran.

Connect the dots.  They paint a very frightening picture.

Marjorie Cohn,  MWC News Magazine senior editor, is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president of the National Lawyers Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists. Cohn is the author of, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law.
Other articles by this author :.

Visit her web site at: http://www.marjoriecohn.com/


This_Category
Category:: Editorial

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1350

Comments (8)
RSS comments
1. 20-03-2008 06:12
Marjorie right on
at the best time, as it starts to ramp up. While I agree totally with you, trying to out shout the corupt media, wall street and goverment, it seems tempting to give up and just stop reading and trying to stay informed. No matter what the outcome of writing a book or editorial, we must continue to try to keep our own jargon to redefine the issues and if possible lanquage used. I hate to use bring the troops home, yes maybe, we are both talking the same military troops. What he and she means is a percentage, or relocate them where they can be called up readily, and occupations remain at the same levels in populations and taxes. Close or reduce military bases and military interests, private and subcontracted. Funding is the language this is where, if he is not blocked from debating, Nader would be a good newcommer. Even if one of the 3 fascist leaning contenders still wins, maybe it will help a greater number who vote for the status quo. To realise with eyes wide open how evil the person is they are giving, possibly one of their last freedoms away to. If one must give one of them their vote then do it freely and with acceptance and knowledge of the true color of their skin. Not out of fear, we have been drowning in fear, and it just seems to perpetuate more.
2. 20-03-2008 23:37
Marjorie right on
come on ADM FALLON  
stay with responsability ! 
 
remember History ? 
 
1932 nanking emp.japan 
1934 abessinia moussolini 
1937 manchoria Emp Japan 
WWII Hitler goehring 
1956 Budapest Chruchow 
1968 Prag Breznew 
1975 Cambodia Pol Pot 
1991 saddam 
2001 taliban 
2003 saddam 
2008/2009 hell will brake lose 
even Democrocie's  
can INFLATE/IMPLODE 
 
 
Also this SURGE here in iraq 
is only as good as the opponents  
want to let it appear
hlg usa
3. 21-03-2008 00:36
ADM FALLON and now GEN HEMPEY
HELL brake loose is this: 
Denver Dem PArty implodes 
Obama too dishonest 
Hillary insufficient backbone  
on this issue here at hand. 
It comes down to Grandpa McCain 
i hope he can maintain his 
health 
if not or if yes  
M.L. may come into place  
by 08/09 Pres BUSH might 
remain into deep 09 
 
The parties on the ground in 
middle East all have each a reason to hold hostages  
play the refugee's.Seek 
help from Iran ,others from 
Saudi Arabia ,again others 
from China/Russia 
 
Many will say "forget about the OIL it is about survival here". 
Many will drop their rifles and run,towards Jordania Syria 
find their way to the mediteranian acces point(s). 
 
Fight about middle East Airspace.Also Hormuz will 
be blocked by 2 or 3 sunken 
Supertanker. 
 
The largest fight within USA  
is then about conscription. 
 
Deficits don't matter ,they will 
cite Reagan. 
Mow them all down some will say 
citing Trnt Lott. 
 
It will be like the Towerconstruction brawl of 
Babel. 
 
Ladie's and Gents , we need to 
do the right thing now ,not 
later,there is later could be to late.  
Consult GEN HAIGG and hlg
hlg usa
4. 21-03-2008 01:40
iraq/iran etc.
:zzz  
oct 2003 T Lott : 
“Honestly, it’s a little tougher than I thought it was going to be,” Lott said. In a sign of frustration, he offered an unorthodox military solution: “If we have to, we just mow the whole place down, see what happens. You’re dealing with insane suicide bombers who are killing our people, and we need to be very aggressive in taking them out.” 
 
my question: 
is there any wisdom in it? i guess some .
hlg usa
5. 21-03-2008 23:27
attack on Iran
For USA to have that in mind they must make sure their commander in chief and the people who endorsed him are ready for another Iraq like war which doesnt have any end in sight.How will a war like the war on Iraq benefits USA? I honestly think that the President is duty bound to explain to the people of USA on the benifits of war,no matter what war it is.As of now i dont see how the USA is getting anything positive from the war in Iraq.I think Mr.Bush is wasting alot of innocent human life.
6. 22-03-2008 14:41
MAD!!!
You know the more I watch the US administration and its machinations, the more I think they are insane, and truly if they believe their own propaganda, well then they are absolutely mad. This poison minded administration is polluting the thinking of its own citizens, they do not know how to protect their selves from this raw insanity. 
And thus start to verbalize this madness as if it were sense, they have lost the will to think and reason. 
What is the maddest thing the US could do, how about a pre-emptive strike against Iran? 
‘Those who the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad’.  
 
Mike
7. 08-04-2008 05:37
petraeus.fallon ,odom questions
Sk Petraeus and ODOM 
 
1) Ask them why German Newspaper e.g. spiegel.de show the destroyed 
 
APC resp. ILAV (Armed personel carrier Tank) last sunday in Sadr City. 
 
And why American Press has not come across his Vehicle. 
 
It is important that we know everything about the warfare and the current balance of POWER . I learned from analysing the picture and the 
 
RPG carrying people around it there , that it must be relatively easy 
 
to hit those vehicles. ALso easy is it to accumulate sufficient RPG 
 
and preposition the individual(s) accordingly and when the day comes 
 
to deploy , all ILAV's can be lost in a matter of hours (deploying time) 
 
 
 
2) withdrawal , how safe is a carefully planned withdrawal from Bagdad ? 
 
In the open desert , movements/maneuverings look relatively safe. 
 
Instructions to refugees ? There could be large masses in the way 
 
resp. in line of anticipated fire. 
 
 
 
3) Training. All iraqies are trained in Infantry Marksmanship . Is it 
 
true , if someone demands training , he is actually just after 
 
absorbing a trainer from his unit. 
 
4) Embedding troops. Is it a risk of becoming a hostage for a GI 
 
TO an Iranian-led regional axis that includes Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria? 
 
Lately many individuals have been observed switching sides or 
 
even commence friendly fire . 
 
This is the most serious concern, the counter-weapon to Nukes are hostages . They can be dispursed and some of them used as human shields to protect high value targets , and held for more than 444 Days, for Generations! Look at North Korea , I learned Families still pslit up 
 
after 55 Years after cease-fire signing. 
 
 
 
 
 
5) Reposition beyond the Horizon . Give up Bagdad Bashra 
 
However maintaqin the Airspace and the OILFIELDS .Feasible ? 
 
All areas or only Curdistan and the Bashra Fields/Ports ? 
 
 
 
6) Attack Iran to cease fire or capitulation. Corridor to Afghanistan. 
 
No question because ,should not be discussed public. 
 
There will be hearings to the appr. commitee ina few hours. 
 
7) Establish Mediteranean acces corridor(s) . Feasible ? 
 
 
 
8) Friendly Bases . Infrastructure schools Housing US Communities.feasible ? 
 
Safe ? can it be made and held safe ? 
 
9) Bagdhad again . All these Taxi's , 60% unimployed, and soo much 
 
movements /business transports , Radiocalls day and night. 
 
Paying customers ? NO I doubt it. Is this all Sadrs OPS ?
hlg
8. 17-04-2008 23:52
petraeus.fallon ,odom questions
GEN DEMPSEY not Hempey
hlg

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Marjorie Cohn William Fallon Dick Cheney Middle East Iran attack
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Enter Amount: