A US judge has ordered the release of 17 Chinese Muslim detainees from the US detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in what has been seen as a rebuke to the Bush administration.
Two blasts occurred near Baghdad's Green Zone outside Iraq's foreign ministry, as John Negroponte, the US deputy secretary of state, was preparing to hold a news conference about his visit to Iraq.
The United Nations Security Council has approved unanimously a resolution urging nations to send more naval ships and military aircraft to stop piracy off the coast of Somalia.
European stock markets have sunk into the red after making initial gains, as the banking sector continues to suffer from a lack of investor confidence amid the global financial crisis.
Tibet was a sovereign nation, as the Dalai Lama says, but for only around 50 years. Since the Yuan Dynasty, the time of Genghis Khan, Tibet has been a tributary of China. That is, Tibet paid to be a country. Tibet was a colony of China. The Yellow Hats, the present ruling Buddhist order, took the ascendancy away from the Red Hats by war--and support (read money and troops) from the Ming Dynasty emperors. In simplistic terms, the confusion at the end of the Qing Dynasty and during the Republican period and the Sino-Japanese War brought Tibet to break away from China. Although the method cannot be condoned, China's invasion of Tibet in the 1950's was taking full control of what was hers for centuries. That is, without Chinese support for 800 years, Tibet would was not a sovereign nation at all. Tibet paid tribute, via both the Red Hat and Yellow Hat hegemony, and could therefore count on interference to maintain controlled peace of the population and religion. Note: the present hegemonic leaders of the Buddhists got their power by violence. Buddhists are fond of maintaining they are against war and violence. The Dalai Lama even has a gold medal to prove this: he's a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. What a sham. The Dalai Lama lives in splendor, even in exile, in direct violation of his vows and the Buddhist belief in non-attachment. Simply put, he's leading a life of illusion. Another way to put it: he's a hypocrite. In truth, no different than any other religious leader. The Dalai Lama says he told his monks to protest non-violently against the route of the Olympic torch--but they defied their leader and protested violently. Or did they defy him? As monks engaging in violence, they are breaking their vows; however, they are being true to their history of violence and suppression in the seeking after power (i.e., illusion and attachment). The idea that this protest was over Chinese control is ludicrous cloud cover. But, in any case, the monks' leader, the Dalai Lama, did not censor them or punish them for breaking their vows. That is, the Dalai Lama condoned violence. Only Der Spiegel has been able to see that this is just another in a recent spate of "let's embarrass the hell out of China and its Olympics" activity, begun by the US. Very few news outlets are noting that US human rights violations are just as heinous, if not more so; but no one has bothered to embarrass the US or sanction the US or take some other kind of damning action against the US over its 500-year history of human rights violations. Double standard. Hypocrisy. The Dalai Lama, if we separate him from a history he did not help happen, is no laurel leaf of peace. Not at all. After the violence broke out in Tibet, he said, publicly, in the news, that he would not do anything to stop the violence. So he tacitly agreed with the violence and supported it. That is, he was willing to let his own people, his own monkish followers die in his name, to keep his Empire in Exile in power, front and centre. Great guy, eh? What kind of leader is it who will run away and proclaim support for his people from the comfortable distance of a palatial Hawaiian estate? He and his monkish court and Western fringe hangers-on don't live in Daramsala or even in their lovely French compound; they live in the island paradise of Hawaii. He wears an expensive gold watch. Are his sandals leather? Maybe the huge spectacles he needs to see the world with are Armani? What did he do with the large monetary reward that came with his Nobel Prize? Is the CIA still paying him for services rendered? Only after the violence was put down by more violence, as seems to be the way of the world, did the Dalai Lama stand up and shout that he was for peace and threatened his life by saying he'd go to Beijing to talk about it. AFTER it was all over. This is the behavior of a man who is a coward, a man who doesn't have the guts to stand up for what he believes. He certainly isn't into saving lives! He doesn't come up even to Gandhi's knees. Look. . .there would have been no violence if he'd not ordered his followers to protest. The Dalai Lama is a scam artist. As Janus-faced and hypocritical as the Pope. He is an embarrassment to Buddhists. He is a prime example of the empty rhetoric of religion, of non-violence-spouting peoples. He is shameful. Any who call themselves Buddhist should distance themselves from this sham lamb. To use his own damning, enslaving-by-guilt language, the Dalai Lama's karma is bad. He's more than likely to find himself reincarnated as a cockroach or a worm than a Bodhisattva. . .or even just a simple, common man. His behavior is like the man who threw a clay idol into the river in order to save the people on the other bank. To the Dalai Lama I say, when the lips are gone, the teeth will grow cold. But buck up! You've got a lot of Americans who think you're the greatest thing since Spam.
Wow. Thanks for this post. I got alot of other things on my plate so I didnt want to write re my questions re the Dalai Lama. Im glad someone has though. a couple other issues are his inability to stand up for India despite being hosted by them for most of his life among other things. I also suspect that because China is finally rising out of centuries of political and cultural domination and is a super power in its own right the Dalai Lama and the Tibet issue are being used as a weapon against them. I think its hilarious hearing the Western powers, esp US and UK lecturing China on Human rights....REMEMBER THE OPIUM WARS?! ANYONE! THE INDIANS BOTH ASIAN AND AMERICAN!? Again thank you.
Guest
2. 26-03-2008 11:43
Finally someone notices
Yes. Being used. China bashing big time. Never done to the US. When all of the peacenicks got together a couple yrs ago, everyone named names except the DL, he just blurbed generalities. I wrote, then, about his woos-assness.
Registered
3. 27-03-2008 02:45
Let's remember those days China was und
Sigh...I remember Hong Kong was once also colony of Britain..but the Brits never called Hong Kong people Brits. China also denied British had any legitimate sovereignty over the \"colony\". Hong Kong people, even totally Westernized, seldom denied their own ethnicity. If this reality applied to China-Hong Kong-British, when British was the top-dog of power..why not apply to other states that replicated this relationship with China. Bear in mind, British back then did have sovereignty over Hong Kong, quite unlike China and Tibet in history. Besides, when another nation state became an tributary country, it means that it was under threat, or under gun point... That is exactly witnessed that the tributary state was not a part of the more powerful country. It would remain submissive and docile under it had the power to revolt. Say, China under Japan's occupation. Anyone that remembers what China has gone through in those dark ages understand the current Tibet-China dynamic...and would not mistake Tibet as part of China in history.
The following is abstractions from wiki
1. The term tributary state refers to one of the two main ways in which a pre-modern state might be subordinate to a more powerful neighbour....so that tribute might best be seen as the payment of protection money. Or it might be more symbolic... 2. Tributary relations involve no element of administrative control or interference by the hegemon. ... former (pre-modern) tributary states deny that there was any transfer of sovereignty. For instance, tributaries of Imperial China implies Chinese sovereign claim over territories not now regarded as Chinese. (say, Korea, Thailand, Vietnam).
Guest
4. 27-03-2008 03:36
Pot stirring
I read both the article and the comments, and if you asked me who do you think has the strongest points I would say yes. Just because China is a long time stand over merchant regarding Tibet, I believe does not give the OK to Buddhist Monks to go on the rampage. A very fine Tibetan monk who I once knew, was asked often, what his opinion was of China's invasion of Tibet, his replies reflected that it was Tibet's karma, and Tibet brought it about by its own actions, this used to puzzle us, but now I think I understand.
You can say the same thing about Korea or Vietnam that they were tributary to China too. Yet China doesn't make the same claim about Vietnam or Korea. Who are these people who keep make excuses for Chinese communist regime that has done terrible things to Tibetans and Han Chinese despite of ethnic and cultural differences? The way the emperors from Yuan, Ming, Qing dynasties governed Tibet was never the same way the communists have done in the past, who are responsible to tens of millions of deaths of Han Chinese. Dalai Lama wants the religious freedom their people deserve and we Han Chinese deserve the same freedom. Stop barking for the Communist regime.
Guest
6. 12-04-2008 16:41
re
Quote:
I believe does not give the OK to Buddhist Monks to go on the rampage.
A very fine Tibetan monk who I once knew, was asked often, what his opinion was of China's invasion of Tibet, his replies reflected that it was Tibet's karma,
1-There are no evidence those rampages was done by 'monks'.
2- There is no such a thing as collective Karma, furthermore no one is suppose to be punished for the sin of their fathers/
Guest
7. 12-04-2008 18:28
re
1. How can you invade a tributary state you\'ve had in tow for 700 yrs? That is, you can you invade a part of your own country? 2. Will you, Kathy, say the same thing about America? where human rights violations are now part and parcel of all gov\'t workings. 3. China never had tributary rights over Korea or Vietnam. America invaded both countries and fucked up, royally. 4. You need to read your history. I know this is difficult for Americans, but try. It\'s chilling. 5. The Dalai Lamas were taskmasters, they owned slaves, they stole the boy babies of the people and made them monks (thus creating a horrid decline in population), they forever explain away other people\'s plight by saying \"it\'s your Karma\": the old fart did it with Katrina. 6. For the past several yrs, the DL and the Chinese gov\'t have had continued talks concerning the DL\'s return to Lhasa and many concessions had already been gotten; however, then there was yet another US move to destabilize the country. 7. The DL remained in Tibet for 8 yrs after the initial re-entry by Mao in 1951--and then, due to a mighty failed US intervention (secret) and the DL\'s being a lackey of the CIA, the DL had to flee in 1959 because he was part of the plot of violence and rapine. 9. Try reading my other article on Tibet/China. 10. Have you figured out that the Republicans call their part of the US, Red State America? Forgotten that all totalitarian Communist states are called RED? 11. Nobody's excusing China's behavior per se; people are saying that there's hypocrisy on the part of the West and blind ignorance and delusion when it comes to the DL.
Registered
8. 21-04-2008 21:20
re
This article is PURE COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA!! How much did Red China pay you to write this crap, or have you been brainwashed and do it for free?
Everyone knows that all Chinese people are MURDERERS and have slaughtered MILLIONS of innocent Tibetans in their death camps. Anyone who sympathizes with the Chinese should be punished.
Why are our troops in Iraq when poor innocent Tibetans clearly need us more? We need to liberate all of China, including Tibet, and reverse the brainwashing of the Chinese public. Otherwise they will only perpetuate genocide.
FREE TIBET!!!
Guest
9. 21-04-2008 21:33
CHINA: Past victim of and future threat
You stated "Anyone who sympathizes with the Chinese should be punished." Thats pretty fascistic of you. if there is any power on earth that is truly worthy of being confronted it is those powers that destroyed China thru Opium, funded Mao, empowered genocide in China and Tibet all the while they enslaved a majority of the world. they mercilessly and brutally caused millions of deaths in India and they are still riding high on the hog siphoning the world's resources. They are also the prime movers behind the Dalai lama scam. It is the powers based in London formerly known as the British Empire. Pls read http://www.rense.com/general81/zec.htm http://www.rense.com/general75/wrus.htm So while there is truth to China's belligerance, it is nothing compared to the machinations of the British based power brokers.
Guest
10. 22-04-2008 14:03
SoccerMom1960
Hello Soccermom1960,
Please don't be so blatantly ignorant and pumped up by Chinese bashing western media. You said,"everyone knows that all Chinese people are murderers". Really? All? I did not know that. Your statement is such a prime example of how Americans are brainwashed by their own media. Where did you hear that "ALL chinese are murderers". Yes, "Free Tibet!" From what? If world peace and human right's were really the issue, then you would realize that arguing over Countries and Borders is exactly what starts wars and creates violence. Maybe you should shout. "Stop judging, don't take sides and lets hope China and Tibet work it out!" or better yet, "I'm a soccer mom/sheep in america that should mind my own business."
Peace.
Guest
11. 23-04-2008 06:37
SoccerMom1960
I\'m all for background information to a current event but this is more an opinion piece. There is some interesting information but it seems mostly a distortion to suit the underlying argument - that the Dalai Lama is a hypocrite. For examply, it\'s my understanding that the DL\'s watch was a gift from a world leader (can\'t remember who). And as for the questions about his sandals, glasses, Nobel prize money and CIA funding perhaps Mr Secor should find out the answers to those questions before he raises them to try and slur the DL. As for what kind of leader would run away from his people perhaps one who fears for his safety would be the answer. Maybe this is not the case but there is nothing in this article to suggest it is not. I recommend an article by Michael Parenti [www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html] which debunks the \'Shangri-La\' view many westeners have of Tibet but is more dispassionate and less weasely.
Registered
12. 23-04-2008 15:34
SoccerMom1960
2-\' There is no such a thing as collective Karma, furthermore no one is suppose to be punished for the sin of their fathers\'
People are often punished for the sins of their fathers; for instance if the head of a wealthy family, wastes the family fortune, the families children suffer the consequence as much as the Father. Also Christianity believes, \"until the third generation\", so I do not know who says, \"...no one is suppose to be punished..\".
I took the meaning of the monks Karma statement, as the collective results of many Karmas over many years. Ask him if you wish, his name is Geshe Acharya Thubten Loden, he wrote a few books. I also thought the first two paragraphs of this article explained Geshe La thoughts. Maybe it was crafty editing, but what saw on TV looked like pretty wild Tibetan monks.
Mike
Registered
13. 24-04-2008 08:26
SoccerMom1960
It seems that Matthew missed the sarcasm and satire nor understands the non-attachment of Buddhism, which would lead him to dispense with the watch because it's not necessary--at least, not a gold one.
I quite enjoyed the Communist propaganda and "everyone knows" bullshit. Obviously, this person knows little history and nothing about Buddhism.
It is not an opnion piece; it is well-founded in history. The sarcasm is pointed and intended to show up the LD's hypocrisy. I am a Buddhist and embarrassed as hell at this shameful man.
Guest
14. 24-04-2008 10:17
My humor ,
'I am a Buddhist and embarrassed as hell at this shameful man.'