Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Politic arrow Obama, FISA, and Parties
Jun 24 2008
Obama, FISA, and Parties | Print |  E-mail
Political Views
By MWC News   

Translation

Obama, FISA, and Parties
by Jason RosenbaumImage
The Seminal

The FISA debacle finally came crashing down while I was on a plane heading towards San Francisco for a short vacation. I'm still out on the West coast, enjoying taking my mind off politics for a little bit, but I do have a few, interrelated thoughts on the situation and what it means for progressive politics:

* This is not entirely unexpected. Obama has always had strong centrist tendencies. FISA is, unfortunately, an issue that doesn't rile a lot of Americans. This was an easy issue to play as a centrist.
   
* Elections matter. There are some that say the progressive movement's focus on elections, especially the primary of the presidential election, was counterproductive. They say we should be focusing on movement goals instead. I disagree. There are differences between Obama and McCain. Having Obama in the White House will make it much more likely progressive policies will be enacted.
   
* Elections aren't everything. Those movement folks have a point, though. We need progressive institutions as much as we need progressive electoral victories. Strong progressive institutions mean we can criticize candidates that do the wrong thing without losing out power. Groups like MoveOn are doing just that. We need more of them.
   
* Obama is a step forward. You have to walk before you can run. Rome wasn't built in a day. You get the idea - this is a process. After 30 years of Reagan and Bush, we can't expect a progressive to be elected immediately. Obama is a major step forward, but he's not the candidate we've been dreaming of.
   
* Obama can be moved. He has been pushed towards progressive positions in the past, and it can happen again. His grassroots backing is a blessing and a curse. If there is enough popular support for progressive policies, he will move. We need to figure out how to most effectively move Obama. I have a feeling this will be the main work of lots of progressives during an Obama administration.

I'll probably have something more coherent once I get back in town, but for now, what are your thoughts? Can we turn Obama into a true progressive, both in the election and as President? Or should we be thinking beyond an Obama administration to 2016 and beyond?

Jason Rosenbaum is a writer and musician currently residing in Washington D.C. He is interested in the intersection of politics and culture, media consolidation issues, and making sense out of our foreign policy disasters. He is also the webmaster for The Seminal and he can be reached at seminal[at]theseminal.com.

 
This_Category
Category:: Political Views

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1557

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 24-06-2008 20:14
Barack Obama is a coward
This is the administration who went into negoiations with Enron to set US energy policy. 
 
and the Democrats are spineless! 
 
Why would they support Enron telecom 
over the people of the United States of America? 
 
We have a God given right "according to GW" to sue these bastards for breaking law of the fourth Ammendemnt of these here United States of America! 
 
You ain't afraid to sue are you? 
You ain't peeing in your pants over a lawsuit are you? 
 
I want my rights! 
I want my rights! 
 
These telecoms deserve to go down! 
 
And these cowards in Congress protecting the Administration once again is absolutely nuts! 
 
Cowards over a lawsuit. 
 
I would filibuster this bill forever 
if I was a US Senator. 
I would kill this bill myself. 
 
Why would Brack Obama vote for these law breaking telecoms? 
 
Why? 
You ain't coward Barack are you?
Guest
2. 26-06-2008 14:56
Oh no! This is sooo depressing.
The United States, so they tell us, fought a revolution for freedom and democracy over 400 years ago. Today, corporate capital controls both sides of a two-party system, the population is at the mercy of rampant capitalism, which spends $300bn a year on destroying other countries and threatens the very existence of the planet and controls the vast majority of the information sources that control the minds of the masses - and this man thinks Obama is a "step in the right direction"? 
Stay on holidays mate, Have another Pina Colada, lie in the sun and try not to think too much about politics. You've obviously had a hard day. 
Ohhhh this is sooo depressing!
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Jason Rosenbaum Obama FISA White House
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: