Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Is America sterile, unable to birth great men?
Aug 04 2008
Is America sterile, unable to birth great men? | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Ben Tanosborn   

Translation

For the lack of a Solzhenitsyn!Image

This past Sunday another citizen of the world, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, started his walk in that never-ending pilgrimage we refer to as immortality.  And he did it, not just as a laureate man of letters, but as a man of well thought-out choices, conscience and true humanity; a man who proudly and joyfully accepted his Russian beginnings, but also conceded highest priority to dignity and humanity as inalienable rights for every man.

News of his death came to me over the Internet as I was reading an article by AP writers Charles J. Hanley and Jae-Soon Chang, "Seoul probes civilian 'massacres' by US," that had just come over the wire.  Thoughts from those two pieces of news were running parallel in my then emotionally-charged mind: here is a man searching for truth (Solzhenitsyn) and, running parallel to it, here is truth searching for a man, some American great man acknowledging that truth… and finding no one.

While reading data of the horrific victimization, actually murder, of countless Korean civilians – as usual, mostly women, children and old people – at the hands of the US military during that 1950-1 period, I couldn't help but think of the Gulag created by Joseph Stalin, "the whiskered one," as described by Solzhenitsyn, and emulated militarily by followers of our own American empire: first in Korea, later in Vietnam and, these days, in Afghanistan and Iraq.

How many thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, innocent civilians were strafed by bullets, or napalmed, in Korea?  Indiscriminately, yes, for our soldiers couldn't tell "one gook from the next," as they claimed… from the North, in flight to the South… or simply trying to find safety, refuge…anywhere.  Over 200 incidents; some, like the one that happened at No Gun Ri, where survivors estimate 400 Koreans died at American hands, have been kept under wraps from the American citizenry; all the military brass needed to do is just classify any and all the facts with the "secret" or "top secret" stamps thus letting the angry-radioactivity cool off, as if converting it to depleted uranium or denying it to be uranium at all, until two or three generations have passed.  By then, who will be charged with war crimes?  It's not a cover-up since Americans pretend, and some actually believe, that we never engage in torture or cover-ups.  The White House has for decades given a free hand to the Pentagon… after all, crimes of war "just happen," and the only crime Americans are not permitted to commit is one which may result in lowering the morale of the troops; or one bringing dishonor to the country.

"While reading data of the horrific victimization, actually murder, of countless Korean civilians – as usual, mostly women, children and old people – at the hands of the US military during that 1950-1 period, I couldn't help but think of the Gulag created by Joseph Stalin, "the whiskered one," as described by Solzhenitsyn, and emulated militarily by followers of our own American empire: first in Korea, later in Vietnam and, these days, in Afghanistan and Iraq."

Then I thought of Solzhenitsyn, and his recollection of being an officer in the Soviet Army, observing the inhumane treatment that the Soviets had inflicted on the Germans, military and civilians, in 1945 as WWII came to a close; perhaps crimes that many would excuse as retribution for what the Germans had done years earlier to them; a retribution that he would not find acceptable. 

Today's counterpoint is simply the ease in which the American military accepts crimes of war, often candy-coating them and making them PR-acceptable, as simply "collateral damage."  Our American military has gained vast experience at decriminalizing many repugnant acts of war during the past six decades, from No Gun Ri to My Lai to Fallujah, expecting future generations to be the ones passing judgment, if at all.  It will probably be three decades or more before we get to know the truth of what happened in Fallujah, Haditha and some of the other unresolved war crimes committed in the Middle East.  Documents will then be declassified as memories fade and many, or most, of the witnesses to the war crimes, as well as the perpetrators, are dead.  Also, after much of the anger in the victims' families has subsided.

Solzhenitsyn was a loving son of Russia and its history; but his humanness made him a great citizen of the world.  He denounced what to him needed to be denounced in every facet of life, whether it pertained to the inhumanity of man towards man; or the way modern society was evolving, including such areas as music.  To his regret, and in spite of his desire for privacy, he was used in propagandistic ways by men he did not hold in high esteem, such as Ronald Reagan; and even criticized by many liberal-secularists who failed to understand that his acceptance of religion in the form of Christian Russian Orthodoxy had little to do with faith, and the inhumanity that faith may have caused, and much to do with history and tradition as basis for change.

Why is it that here in America we don't produce notable figures, heroes of humankind?

Do we prefer not to be "snitches" to those who commit crimes, not to be "traitors" to the ugly face our country may show at times; this, when in truth we really are, maybe without realizing it, whitewashers of crimes… and traitors to our own humanity?

(c) 2008 Ben Tanosborn

Ben Tanosborn an editor of MWC News, after completing graduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), set out for a career in international business that would take him to five continents, expose him to several cultures and make him realize the importance for any and all Americans to become goodwill ambassadors for the United States.
Other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Ben-Tanosborn

This_Category
Category:: Editorial

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1457

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 06-08-2008 11:19
We have heroes out there
Ben, you recognize the truth and are acknowledging it in this excellent article. There are other heroes of humankind out there, speaking truth courageously, embracing social justice and acting on it daily in unsung jobs around the country. Maybe they are not nationally known, maybe they work at grassroots levels shoulder-to-shoulder with the people they are trying to help, but they are passionate about the truth and feel a deep and abiding concern about man's inhumanity to man. They bring light wherever they go and to those who are fortunate enough to be within the sound of their voices. 
 
These people have the stamina, courage and intelligence to endure the rigors of the election process in this country, but they are not drawn to that arena for the simple reason that they know they cannot continue to speak the truth as they know it, an essential part of their nature, and still be elected to office.  
 
We have heroes who should be leading this country, but the American people are, unfortunately, averse to the truth, and will not put people into office who speak it clearly and without reservation. What a terrible pity. I try to retain a sense of hope that one day this attitude of fear and denial of the truth by so many people in our country will change.  
 
Below, two quotes of Alexander Solzhenitsysn taken from Allen Roland's weblog today: 
 
"One word of truth shall outweigh the whole world" 
 
He prophetically wrote in his WARNING TO THE WEST in 1974. ( Farrar, Strauss and Giroux. pg 79-80 ): 
 
" We are approaching a major turning point in world history, in the history of civilization. It's the sort of turning point where the hierarchy of values which we have venerated, and we use to determine what is important to us and what caused our hearts to beat is starting to rock and may collapse. These two crises, the political crisis of today's world and the oncoming spiritual crisis, are occuring at the same time. Your leaders will need profound intuition, spiritual foresight, high qualities of mind and soul. May God grant that in those times you will have at the helm personalities as great as those who created your country"
Guest
Donna N.
2. 06-08-2008 18:43
We have heroes out there
Amen to what you're saying, Donna. There are definitely heroes working daily side by side with us... but what we need are just a few notable men and women... from the arts, sciences and letters who challenge the nefast society we live in and the way we're governed; and who are willing to put themselves at risk by such challenge... American Solzhenitsyn(s) of sorts.
Guest
ben@tanosborn.comNOSPAM! ">Ben Tanosborn
3. 06-08-2008 22:03
US Silence over American Gulag
Excellent article, Ben.  
 
Key summation: \"Why is it that here in America we don\'t produce notable figures, heroes of humankind? Do we prefer not to be \"snitches\" to those who commit crimes, not to be \"traitors\" to the ugly face our country may show at times; this, when in truth we really are, maybe without realizing it, whitewashers of crimes… and traitors to our own humanity?\" 
 
Obviously America DOES produce millions of good, decent, courageous, \"ordinary\" folk who variously stand up against evil, the Rosa Parks of this world and the scores of thousands who fled to Canada because they refused to be part of the mass murder of Asian women and children (excess deaths associated with post-1945 US Asian wars now total 25 million, mostly women and children).  
 
However when you make a list of great writers and artists who unambiguously stood up for Humanity (I can\'t think of any politicians except for people such as Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader, Ramsey Clark, Martin Luther King and their fellow activists) one has a very short list e.g. the likes of Paul Robeson, Paul Craig Roberts, Mark Weissbrot, Toni Morrison, Jane Fonda, Arthur Miller, Mike Mooore, Linus Pauling, Curtis Doebbler, Paul Ehrlich, humanitarian scientists and in particular those behind the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Carson McCullers, I.F. Stone, Gore Vidal, James Baldwin, Norman Finkelstein, Bertell Ollman, Noam Chomsky, William Blum, John Perkins, Phillip Agee...  
 
And let\'s not forget our \"own\" MWC News-linked Professor Marjorie Cohn and Professor Walter Davis ...  
 
A key action of Alexander Solzhenitsyn was his May 1967 open letter to the Fourth Congress of the Writers’ Union of the USSR in which he said: “I call upon the Congress to demand and insist on the abandonment of all forms of censorship…” 
 
However where are the great men and women who protest the NUMERICAL ACTUALITY of the carnage of the American Gulag that stretches (with a few interruptions) from Occupied Somalia to Occupied Afghanistan and Predator Robot-bombed Waziristan in formerly \"British\" Pakistan. 
 
Thus, using estimates from the UN Population Division, UNICEF and top US medical epidemiologists, it is estimated that the continuing Palestinian Genocide, Iraqi Genocide and Afghan Genocide involve post-invasion excess deaths of 0.3 million, 2 million, and 3-6 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths of 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.3 million, respectively; and refugees totalling 7 million, 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively) (for recent details and documentation see: Palestinian, Iraqi, Afghan, Biofuel and Climate Genocides – Silence Kills and Silence is Complicity
 
Leading Americans who have referred to the \"Iraqi Genocide\" per se - ONLY Dr Mark Weissbrot (Just Foreign Policy) and Dr Paul Craig Roberts (conservative Father of Reaganomics), as far as I know. 
 
Leading Americans who have referred to the \"Afghan Genocide\" per se - ONLY Professor Ali Khan (law professor, Topeka, Kansas), as far as I know. 
 
Where are the American Solzhenitsyns to expose the American Gulag?
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
4. 08-08-2008 01:17
A profound question
Ben, your question "Why is it that here in America we don't produce notable figures, heroes of humankind?" is really quite profound. 
 
I oversimplified the issue in my comments and erroneously focused on elected leaders in our country. 
 
I don't know the answer to your question. 
 
Should a hero emerge, however, it will be someone whose humanness makes him or her "a great citizen of the world." 
 
Thank you for your thought-provoking article.
Guest
Donna N.
5. 20-08-2008 19:48
Coming full circle, not that Russia is a
Another great article Ben. Not to discredit Solzhenitsyn I have wondered about Stalins camps that he exposed? Not to defend Stalin either. While in a differant place and time. But as evidence has been presented, how accurate or real in respect to Serbia, Venezuala as ex. Mass graves or a mass grave can be used to paint a larger false one? In this I find it questioning, that given the numbers of Stalins crimes that not more were able to escape and confirm. I have herd that during the cold war anything could be written about the USSR and communism and historians did little to use traditional critic of that what was written, so writters were given free reign from publishers. After the USSR fall, a few with some noteriety have tried to expose the misconceptions the west portrayed of the east, but it is hard to tear down 50yrs well entrenched misconceptions. With all the covert and propaganda methods that were used even today on the war on terror, difficult for even those serching and questioning these areas to come up with a defining moment. In light of what I have just posted, I keep this on Dostoyevsky and Solzhenitsyn, probably posted them before. Both of these so pertinent to todays world. Democracy, Freedom, & Responsibility 
On June 8,. 1978, heroic anti-Soviet intellectual Alexander Solzhenitsyn gave an address at Harvard that bears consideration on numerous grounds. The two paragraphs below offer some remarks on Western freedom, addressing, first, the media, and, second, the population as a whole: 
 
\"The press too, of course, enjoys the widest freedom. (I shall be using the word press to include all media). But what sort of use does it make of this freedom? Here again, the main concern is not to infringe the letter of the law. There is no moral responsibility for deformation or disproportion. What sort of responsibility does a journalist have to his readers, or to history? If they have misled public opinion or the government by inaccurate information or wrong conclusions, do we know of any cases of public recognition and rectification of such mistakes by the same journalist or the same newspaper? No, it does not happen, because it would damage sales. A nation may be the victim of such a mistake, but the journalist always gets away with it. One may safely assume that he will start writing the opposite with renewed self-assurance. \" \"Without any censorship, in the West fashionable trends of thought and ideas are carefully separated from those which are not fashionable; nothing is forbidden, but what is not fashionable will hardly ever find its way into periodicals or books or be heard in colleges. Legally your researchers are free, but they are conditioned by the fashion of the day. There is no open violence such as in the East; however, a selection dictated by fashion and the need to match mass standards frequently prevent independent-minded people from giving their contribution to public life. There is a dangerous tendency to form a herd, shutting off successful development.\" One of Dostoyevsky\'s characters [Brothers Karamazov, Signet Classic, p. 292], although developing the rather different concept of having the courage to admit one\'s personal errors, makes a remark highly relevant to Solzhenitsyn\'s warning: \" \'You are, I see, a man of great strength of character….You have dared to serve the truth, even when by doing so you risked incurring the contempt of all.\' \" In our so called free world of democracy that is thought controlled trough corporate media, it is more important for us to speak out in every way we can to keep other truths alive. Bear witness as some say. We see evidence of this in another force fed election here in the US, where those who really should be up front and offer real change and politic are pushed to the back, and we forced to live with the illusion we must pick from the two evil parties THEY lay before us. Obama a wolf in sheeps clothing, not that McSame dresses any better, is the ultimate in US decietful history, both will endorse the further assault on existing and new innocent peoples in the M.E. and possibly other. In Georgia we hear it said, \" once again the agressor is made out to be the victim. Have we come full circle here.
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ben Tanosborn Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn America sterile No Gun Ri My Lai Fallujah.Alexander Solzhenitsyn Russian author
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: