Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Can Obama Bridge America’s Wall of Ignominy
Aug 13 2008
Can Obama Bridge America’s Wall of Ignominy | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Robert Weitzel   

Translation

Can Obama Bridge America’s Wall of Ignominy

“The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.”

Barak Obama


ImageWhen Barak Obama visited Germany in July, he stood at the site where a wall once separated East and West Berlin. With his usual eloquence he praised the crowd of 200,000 for having had the courage to tear that wall down. He reminded them that the “greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us one from the other.”
 
The day before his Berlin speech Obama was in Israel standing less than two miles from the 400-mile-long apartheid wall that separates Israel from the West Bank. He did not call on Israeli courage to tear their wall down, nor did he mention that wall to his Berlin audience.
 
I recently wrote about Obama’s Berlin speech and his politically “prudent” silence regarding Israel’s apartheid wall. I challenged him to walk his talk should he be elected president and work to tear down the world’s most unconscionable wall.
 
Responding to that piece in an email, Eric Murillo, an activist from El Paso, Texas, reminded me that “there is another wall that exists on the US/Mexican border . . . this wall is still under construction . . .THIS wall is HERE! . . . Must we ignore it?”

Mr. Murillo was referring to the 700-mile-long, $2.2 billion wall along the US/Mexico border that will, in Obama’s Kingesque prose, “separate us one from the other.”

I should mention that Senator Obama voted for the 2006 Secure Fence Act, which authorized the construction of the five segments of the new wall along the 1,952-mile border between the United States and Mexico.

I should mention also that Kollsman Inc., an American-based subsidiary of the Israeli company, Elbit Systems Ltd., which supplies the surveillance and security technology for its apartheid wall, was awarded a contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supply “technology . . . to deter and prevent crossings . . . along the US borders with Canada and Mexico.”

It seems American taxpayers, who are bankrolling Israel’s million-dollar-a-mile apartheid wall with an annual contribution of $3 billion in economic and military aide (one-sixth of U.S. foreign aid budget), will be paying an Israeli company to help build our border wall using the experience and expertise the American nickel has already paid for—such is the way of boondoggles.
 
Mr. Murillo wishes America’s million-dollar-a-mile border wall was a mere boondoggle. For him it is a “wall of ignominy,” a phrase coined by Mexico’s former president Vicente Fox. It is “concrete” evidence that the economic globalization policies championed by the Clinton and Bush administrations open borders for the “migration” of multinational corporate profits and natural resources to “countries with the most” from “those with the least,” but closes borders to migration of those whose livelihoods have been diminished or destroyed by globalization’s cynical reality.
 
Predictably then, the numbers of illegal immigrants from Mexico increased exponentially after the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the early 1990s.
 
Raising a family’s economic status ten-fold by illegally entering the United States—and that’s assuming only minimum wage or less—is a powerful incentive to attempt the arduous, if not deadly, desert border crossing. Consider for a moment why swarms of Canucks are not illegally crossing our pine-forested northern borders each year.
 
Just as Israel’s American financed apartheid wall separates lives and livelihoods and imprisons dreams, so goes America’s Israeli built “wall of ignominy.”
 
Calexico, California, a community of 27,000, has a mutual aid agreement with Mexicali, just across the border. These two communities not only support each other with police and fire protection, but their economies are interdependent as well. Calexico’s stores depend on Mexican shoppers. "If we don't have Mexico, we don't have Calexico,” said former Calexico Mayor Alex Perrone.
 
This is not an isolated border relationship. It is one that occurs along the entire 1952-mile border. Mike Allen, an executive vice president with the Economic Development Corporation of McAllen, Texas, a community of 131,000 along the US/Mexico border, said, "Every single mayor from Brownsville to El Paso is against it [border wall].”  He went on to say, “This will be a tremendous waste of money, and it will not stop [illegal] immigration. People will just go around it."
 
Jeff Passel, a demographer with the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington D.C., estimated that as many as one-third of the eleven million illegal immigrants in the United States in 2005 did not hop over or tunnel under or walk around a border wall. They entered the country legally on visitor, student, or work visas and stayed after their visas had expired.  All nineteen of the 9/11 hijackers entered the country this way.
 
It is not “Israel-lite” walls we should be constructing between “[ourselves] with the most and those with the least.” We should be constructing bridges to economic parity that will allow “those with the least” to cross over to a more secure, fulfilling future for themselves and their families without having to illegally cross a national border.
 
Obama’s good looks and charisma and cadenced speechifying cannot help but remind one of John Kennedy. Hopefully, before he makes another speech about tearing down walls he will read Kennedy’s “Alliance for Progress” and begin building bridges so that its vision of a “hemisphere where all men can hope for a suitable standard of living and all can live out their lives in dignity and in freedom” has a chance to finally be realized.
 
In such a hemisphere, people will be content to remain in the country where their roots are secured by the generations buried there.
 


Robert Weitzel, MWC NEWS editor, is an educator and freelance writer who lives in Madison, Wisconsin. His essays regularly appear in The Capital Times of Madison.
other articless by this auhor: http://mwcnews.net/Robert-Weitzel 


This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1185

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 13-08-2008 22:02
Are you Kidding?
Your article is titled with the question "Can Obama Bridge America’s Wall of Ignominy" The answer is absolutely not, Mr Obama is a socialist and his plan will ultimately lower the standard of living for everyone in both countries. When there are no longer rich prosperous Americans to provide factories and innovation that makes the world move we will end up just as the Soviet union did. We should remember where we came from and what this nation stands for, I will never resent or begrudge a man the right to drive a 100k car or ride in limo's after all if he can aspire to that in this country then so can you or you or even I. The wealthy in the process of getting there also bring a lot of people with them and that is good for everyone. Socialism is our enemy, and we should never forget that, we should be taking 2 steps back in the direction we came from not two in the direction of socialism. :cry :cry  
Guest
2. 13-08-2008 22:10
Are you Kidding?
Quote:
 
Socialism is our enemy,

 
 
Ignorance is your enemy.
Guest
Shahram
3. 19-08-2008 01:57
Are you Kidding?
An Israeli company to help us secure our borders? ?? Absolutely! You want the best, don't you? Yes, we helped them develop the technology. Its our turn to use it. Boondoggle. Try looking it up, you ignoramus. Where is exacly is this waste of money?
Guest
4. 20-08-2008 14:25
...thate walls that separate.
In effort to make more money, illegals are brought to the Midwest, working at a cut rate. Then, the American worker is expected to fall in line and work for this newly created payscale. This technique of hiring and suppling goods is not even close to a market driven economy.  
 
These walls that separate in the US are not only in walled communities and border walls.  
 
Education, health and dental care, transportation, housing: these are all silently lain walls. Let us not forget age, gender identity, racial heritage and the disabled communities as places, areas in this nation where workers find walls.  
 
Don\'t even begin to compare Europes success with Israels\' downfall nor our own.  
 
Obama is addressing those invisible walls we fortify in the US. How does that make him a socialist or a quasi Soviet system? 
 
Did you know that up to 40% of all homeless persons are children? Now. Tell me...what?
Guest
5. 28-08-2008 22:39
...thate walls that separate.
Obama is a corporate capitalist. Yeh, he wants to bring his cronies along with. (socialist?) He and Hilary voted against one war bill, but they waited to be the last to cast their votes. Vote #\'s nay and yeh are called out as they are cast. He voted against putting a lid on credit card interest rates of 30%. He also voted for the new bankruptcy law. Wonder wher Bidens votewas on these? He did not vote to go into Iraq but has voted for nearly every war bill since. He voted to give immunity to the telecommunication companies. He is for all practicle purposes, for the elitists, a wolf in sheeps clothing. Because of this and the slaughter he will reap on the poorest and most admiring of his tribe he is but the scumb of the earth. The enthusiam displayed at the convention is alarming at how the media can lead these people to the slaughter, literally. His V.P pick is only evidence more, that his bringing the troops home is in regaurds to a rest before redeployment to another illegal war in Afganistan. Statements by him and Biden show they intend to keep the cold war and USAgression alive and growing. A Hilary ticket would have really solidified the ticket for a historical peoples base, but Obama was courting another base, that of the elites of the US and yes, even EU (NATO). The enthusiasm and false hope that he generates is particularly upsetting. One only need view the convention to see this in the interviews. It is so alarming given the fact of the economic state of the US and EU, coinsiding with the inflaming events to ignite a 2nd cold war. What could the Oct surprise be or as some have predicted a second 9/11. The last election, Sept. of 06 Nacy Pelocie on public television, on a major political show, stated impeachment was off the table. Thus so the constitution is off the table, same time a message to wall street, we\'ll keep your agenda going. We have been seeing that again. They claim to be the party of the people, while having their own individualised courting bedside manners, they are competing with the repugs to the top 1% of society for a marraige in Nov, with their exceptional herd management skills, guised as so called compassion.
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Robert Weitzel Senator Obama Secure Fence Act US-Mexican border Mexico
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount:


an EffectiveBrand toolbar