Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Obama's choice of Biden for VP is brilliant only if they win
Aug 23 2008
Obama's choice of Biden for VP is brilliant only if they win | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Don Williams   

Translation

ImageObama's choice of Biden for VP is brilliant only if they win

Barack Obama's selection of Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden as a running mate makes great political sense–but only if Obama wins. So, the logic is hard to assail with one obvious exception I'll come back to. First, here's why it's sorta brilliant.

1. Biden is by far the most engaging public servant at work today, whether working a room or in a national debate. Watching him on TV, I've always been struck by his good sense, outspokenness and sense of humor, even when I've disagreed on the issues. Watch him get off the first one-liner, er, one-worder in a Democratic debate, if you don't believe me.

2. His personal story's every bit as engaging and dramatic as McCain's POW story, without the taint of having been involved in military disasters and an unfortunate war in Vietnam. For a reminder, click here.

3. Biden balances Obama in an astounding number of ways. His maturity balances Obama's youth. His working class background counters Obama's elitist reputation. His off-the-cuff out-spoken-ness and passion balance Obama's tendency toward over-sophisticated phrasing and lofty sentiment. Biden's popularity among feminists and his solid legislative record in regards to women's issues will offset the resentment some Hillarites still harbor for Obama. His willingness to engage in rough-and-tumble politics might stand in for Obama's distaste for same. His northeast background complements Obama's Midwestern holdings. I could go on.

Of course, the exception I refer to is what might be remembered one day as a missed opportunity. By bringing Hillary Clinton onto a so-called "Dream Ticket," Obama would've solidified the Democratic vote, including those who made up half of the "undecideds" in recent polls, and could've made a considerable dent among Republican and Independent women voters. Such a choice might've been unstoppable.

In addition, by choosing Hillary, Obama certainly would have won over Bill Clinton, still the most popular Democratic president since Roosevelt, and the only one since then to win a second term. Could be that Obama resisted sullying his place in history by an association with the only modern president to be impeached. Yes, Bill can be a loose cannon as well, but that might be a good argument for anchoring him to the campaign.

Finally, bringing Hillary on would've made so much history, the story would've galvanized the world, including the American press and the public. The first ticket composed of a man of color and a woman. The resurgence of the Clinton brand. Bill's vindication. The uniting of the party. Imagine the hoopla.

Yes there's a down side to bringing all the Clinton baggage on board. Who donated to the Clinton Library? Would Bill and Hillary connive to leverage her position into an ungovernable power base within the administration?

Still, Obama/Clinton might've been an invincible ticket, and given the swiftness this month with which Obama lost his once substantial lead, he might rue the day he passed on Hillary.

Having said that, Biden's a great choice, despite that caveat. If Obama wins, he'll be glad he let Hillary slide.

Stay tuned. It's getting excited.

Don Williams a contributing editor at MWC is a widely published columnist, short story writer, and the founding editor and publisher of New Millennium Writings, an annual literary anthology...

Read other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Don-Williams


This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 903

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 24-08-2008 16:07
More of the same...
Though I appreciate Don's attempt to paint a happy face on this ticket, reality is much different. 
 
Biden is a lifetime member of the political Elite, a first rate war-monger, internationalist, interventionist, and self-pronounced Zionist. His family story is engaging, but we all have tales that should command empathy and sympathy. Such a background does not impart some moral superiority or special gift for leadership.  
 
His selection as Obama's running mate confirms for anyone with eyes to see that the candidate of "Change" is, in fact, no more that a rhetorically-gifted front man for the Establishment. 
 
The installation of these men and their handlers (or McCain/whoever, for that matter) will insure that Amerika is able to continue down its same destructive Corporatist path. We will see continued war (the degree of it really matters little), continued looting of the nation (in the name of "Free Trade"), continued destruction of the economy (in the service of corporate bottom lines), continued inattention to our social services, infrastructure, and health care system, and, continued support for the military adventurism of the Neo-Cons in Israel and the US. 
 
If you want real change, then you need to stop supporting the mainline candidates (all carefully picked for us by the Establishment)and throw your support to people of principle. Barr, McKinney, or Nader - it matters not - any one them would be superior to the Democratic or Republican tickets!
Guest
rdotson@tds.netNOSPAM! ">Robert
2. 26-08-2008 22:38
Roberts optimistic
I enjoyed the article, it is what it is. We will be seeing many more. I have no intention to give either of the two parties vote. I even hesitate to give my vote to a 3rd party. While I try to tell myself it is an arm of my free speech option to vote. With all the atrocities the (free?) capitalist countries have commited the last hundreds. Can we really vote out what has evolved? While I remain undecided on giving my ideas away in my vote. As this post goes down so is the chess game of surrounding Russia, skirmishes in Pakistan, and the panting breath and salivating over Darfur, Venezuala, and Burma triangle. As far as the other two soups, whats done is done, and they\'re not closing the bases and arcades. So in response to Dons article, I thought Bama might pick Biden or Clark for the essence of what the machine wants (more blood,oil,and profits), but to entertain their base and gossip Hilary would have controlled the worlds humanitarians attention and gossip much more, yet let, slaughter continue. The picture would still remain the same Total War Inc.
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Don Williams Democratic vote Obama Biden
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: