Aug 29 2008
Sarah Palin is Bad for Women | Print |  E-mail
Society + Culture
By MWC NEWS   

Translation

Sarah Palin is Bad for Women
by Hannah McCreaImage

Like many today I watched in semi-awe as Alaska Governor Sarah Palin graciously accepted the position of John McCain’s running mate.

Television pundits explained why the Palin “package” is so compelling to conservatives. Palin is a (very) junior Republican who has already earned herself an excellent reputation for fighting corruption, as well as an 80+% approval rating as Alaska’s governor. At 44, she is the mother of 5 children, the oldest of whom recently enlisted and will soon be deployed to Iraq. She is a lifelong NRA member, a hunter, a high school basketball champion, and a former runner up for Miss Alaska. She is vehemently pro-domestic drilling — including in ANWR — and as one pundit suggested, possesses a “keen sense of the geopolitics of energy.” Palin’s background is thoroughly middle-class, and her high-school sweetheart husband is a lifelong union member.

There can be no doubt that Palin’s selection is purely tactical — a decision based more on image and balance than on substance and qualifications. Palin’s youth, beauty, and distance from Washington were all chosen because they directly counter shortcomings of McCain. Her indisputable conservatism in areas where McCain has appeared moderate — abortion, the Second Amendment, drilling — as well as her “strength” in domestic issues, balances nicely with McCain’s flip-flopping war-focused campaign.

Perhaps most importantly, Palin’s nomination and election would be hailed as breaking down barriers. Indeed, today’s “it turns out the women of America aren’t finished” speech made clear that Palin’s job on this ticket is to recruit as many former Hillary supporters as possible.

But what was disturbing today was how clear it became that Palin’s job is not only to recruit women, but to simultaneously promote conservative notions of how women should be.

Palin is in many ways the perfect “family woman.” She has given birth to five children, and (even today, while standing next to her new running mate) publicly honors her husband as the man in this world she admires most. Putting herself in contrast to Hillary Clinton and even Michelle Obama, Palin identifies herself first as a “hockey mom” who never had any ambitions to enter professional politics. Arguably the two most important appeals of her candidacy involve her sons: Due to her oldest son’s enlistment she is soon to become the most high profile Iraq mom since Cindy Sheehan. And last year when she learned she was carrying a baby with Downs Syndrome, she elected not to have an abortion — a move that crystallized her endorsement by the Christian Coalition. Moreover, after her son’s birth this April, Palin returned to work three days later without requesting maternity leave.

For all these reasons, Palin’s selection as McCain’s VP is offensive, not only because there are far more experienced women out there who perhaps don’t “look” as good, but because her personal choices as a woman — as a wife and as a mother — are about to be scrutinized and politicized in a way that can only hurt women.

Palin’s pro-life stance combined with her personal history subtly reinforces the idea that there is no acceptable excuse for terminating a pregnancy — that education, healthcare, employment flexibility, and the presence of a reliable spouse or partner are incidental in the decision to have children, and anyway, are available to those who work for them. More specifically, it sends a message to women that if they become pregnant they should have the baby — regardless of whether they already have 4 children, regardless of whether they have a career they’d like to advance, and regardless of whether they know their baby will have Downs syndrome.

Similarly, Palin’s selection sends a disingenuous and alarming message to American mothers — that even if it puts their son or daughter in mortal, daily danger there is no reason not to support the war in Iraq; that gun control is unnecessary; and that this country makes it easy for women with five children (including a five month old) to have a successful career and even, say, run for Vice President.

I have zero doubt that Sarah Palin is an intelligent, capable woman who is truly dedicated to reforming government and eliminating corruption. I also have zero doubt that she lives the life she chooses — that there is strength and independence in her convictions on abortion, guns, and energy, that she really does see politics as public service, and that she truly loves and admires her husband and every one of her children without concern for how it makes her look.

But her profound lack of national experience serves as glaring evidence that she has not been selected for her qualifications, her courage, or her brain, but for the personal choices she has made for her family and for herself as a woman. Quite frankly, conservatives have rewarded a woman politically for deciding to keep a baby and for sending her son to Iraq. For this reason, Palin’s selection is a great disservice to women — and further evidence of how truly destructive a Republican victory will be for American women. 

Hannah McCrea is but a bachelor in economics. Currently a student in the MSc program in Environmental Policy & Regulation at the London School of Economics, she hopes to return to the US and continue her pursuits in market-based environmental policy, social justice, and anti-corporate law. When she is not blogging, she delights in many things, among them palak paneer, running, and Tenor Saw. She can be reached at mac[at]theseminal.com.


This_Category
Category:: Society + Culture

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1791

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 30-08-2008 01:22
Discussing the war on the Glenn Beck show, she stated that "We're fighting in some sense over energy supplies." I just don't see why our soldiers should be dying for that reason. If we were in Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction, then fine. If we’re there to root out terrorists, then fine. In fact, as long as we’re fighting to protect American lives, then I can understand her support for the war. But how can she say that the war is about oil and still approve of us having sent thousands of America’s young men and women to die in Iraq? Keeping the price of gasoline down by a few cents isn’t worth a single American soldier’s life. It simply doesn’t make sense to (1) believe that we’re fighting for oil, and (2) still support putting our troops in the line of fire. 
 
For anyone who would like to hear the above quote in context, the interview is available on YouTube and the relevant bit is at exactly the eight-minute mark.
Guest
fjfjdv@yahoo.comNOSPAM! ">fjfjdvdv
2. 30-08-2008 01:54
I'm inspired by her life story how she breaks the "politician" mold. She's a high quality, middle class person who is refreshing to me. The author of this article sounds threatened or feels inferior Sara Palin. She's great for women... a true inspiration.
Guest
3. 30-08-2008 02:00
She wants to leave her newborn downs baby behind while she runs off to Washington. Where are the family values?
Guest
4. 30-08-2008 21:48
Sarah Palin UNFIT for ANY office
According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, the world's biggest general scientific organization and the publisher of the world's top scientific journal Science), the major threats to humanity are (1) nuclear weapons, (2) global warming and (3) poverty (see: AAAS on nuclear, greenhouse & poverty threats and Rational Risk Management) . Where does Bush-ite Sarah Palin stand on these core issues? 
 
1. Palin supports American Empire, nuclear weapons, US and Israeli nuclear terrorism, US and Israeli state terrorism, and the invasion, occupation and devastation of other countries (countries currently occupied and devastated "in whole or in part" by the US or its surrogates with Palin's support include Occupied Haiti, Somalia, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Diego Garcia, Iraq, Afghanistan and robot-bombed Waziristan in Pakistan). Using estimates from the UN Population Division, UNICEF and top US medical epidemiologists, one can estimate the human cost of the continuing, Palin-supported Palestinian Genocide, Iraqi Genocide and Afghan Genocide - post-invasion excess deaths 0.3 million, 2 million, and 3-6 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.3 million, respectively; refugees totalling 7 million, 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively) (for the latest details and documentation see: Palin-supported Palestinian Genocide, Iraqi Genocide and Afghan Genocide ).  
 
2. Palin is intimately connected with Big Oil and supports the burning of fossil fuels to the extent of raping one of the world's last pristine wildernesses (Alaska) to get more oil to burn (see what Palin's mates have done to Alaska's environment that now threatens the world via the US National Snow and Ice Data center, NSIDC : "Arctic sea ice now second-lowest on record" ). Polluter Palin is demonstrably happy to foul her own Alaskan nest as well as the whole World in the interests of Big Oil. 
 
3. Palin supports violent and subversive US global hegemony that is associated with 16 million avoidable deaths annually (9.5 million of these avoidable deaths being under-5 year old infants) (see: Global avoidable mortality , “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” ,G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: Body Count and Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950 ). 
 
Sarah Palin comprehensively fails and is unfit to hold any public office because of her extreme right wing and anti-humanitarian attitudes to the core threats to Humanity and to Children in particular, namely – nuclear weapons, global warming, global poverty and mass murder of African and Asian children by genocidal US state terrorism.
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya
5. 31-08-2008 03:53
Dictatorship!
When I heard the details of Sarah Palin, I thought to myself,"to what extremes will the far right go to keep the 'Clayton' republican dictatorship in power?". Of course the corporate oil, medical,armament and pharmaceutical industries will back the likes of the 'hooting tooting gunslinging mama'. 
She is being used to portray the illusion to the US public, that she is an 'All American Mama', just like the American womenfolk, an illusion. 
The trouble with politics of this type, is it is aimed to feed the collective ego, projecting a false image of the self, by people (in this case women) identifying with the roll model. 
If this does not appear to to be working, I am sure 'They', will resort to whatever it takes to keep the presented republican. 
 
Mike
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Hannah McCrea Alaska Governor Sarah Palin
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: