Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Bush's Legacy: From Genocide To Depression
Oct 02 2008
Bush's Legacy: From Genocide To Depression | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Ben Tanosborn   

Translation

Dumb and Dumber: An economic-political sequelImage

Just as Jim (Carrey) and Jeff (Daniels) made America laugh with their classic comedy back in 1994, "John and Barack "are also making us laugh as they act this 2008 drama in comedic fashion.  Here is the nation falling apart economically, and here we have two senators contending for the highest office in the land who, instead of charging forward on white stallions ready to joust, show up riding side-saddle on decrepit mules.  McCain totally clueless about the economy… ditto for his rival Obama.  We truly have reached what could be termed as "bottom of the barrel" politics, with a duet of dumb and dumber politicians claiming leadership when they should be claiming ignorance.

We need to be clear here.  By dumb we don't mean to categorize these two senators as stupid, dense, dim, thick, obtuse or unintelligent.  Certainly not Barack Obama!  No, we are not so much thinking this time around in terms of intellectual acuity; that's not what we have in mind.  Our aim is targeted instead to those other acceptions of being silent or inarticulate to the problems, to the true reality of America; of late, to the economic thievery that has scuttled the promise that this nation has always been, whether in truth or in hopeful fantasy.  And certainly, neither one of them is addressing true reform, from the core out.

The worst thing that could be happening to America hasn't happened; at least not yet!  And that will be going through with a bailout… Congress giving the green light to the commander-in-thief for the continuing criminal sacking of Main Street by that red light district which has always beamed with whorish activity: Wall Street; specifically, its financial sector.  That sector which for years has held congress members of both parties hostage by paying a good share of their reelection campaigns' cost.

Wednesday, the Senate succumbed to Bush just as it had six years before, and by an almost identical vote (77-23 then and 74-25 now) and it did it in all its glory, adding no less than $150 billion in pork barrel.  And if all that weren't significant enough, the roll call of the "yeas" included three senators, one or two soon to figure prominently in the future of America inheriting two wars and an inevitable major economic depression: Biden, McCain and Obama.  Now capitulation is left in the hands of the House.

Here was the greatest opportunity to exercise political leadership for Obama or for any other politician with sufficient gumption to tell America the unmasked economic truth; but apparently we don't seem to have any truth-tellers or junior paladins in this vast land of ours; not within this corrupt political duopoly that rules our lives.  Instead of having a comprehensive, redemption-worthy plan restructuring and regulating both banking and the markets, one that would instill public confidence, Obama showed an advocacy not much different from that which McCain supports. 

It would have been so easy at this time to outline a plan to overhaul the entire system which has Corporate America in charge of our destiny; to outlaw predatory practices.  Even if such a plan were presented as preliminary, a work-in-progress, and not in final form; the objective: to gain the confidence and support of Main Street America. 

We, in America, have been both perpetrators and victims of our own Ponzi scheme with total assistance from self-serving industries that produce little in the way of services, yet derives inordinate, undeserved wealth for themselves (unscrupulous players associated with real estate hooliganism); a robin-hood in reverse government headed by Bush; and a Fed operating against the public's welfare.  By 2006 America had self-injected its economy with more than six trillion dollars of "make believe" wealth, which had its genesis in overpriced real estate (housing) and which soon permeated to everything else, including the financial markets.  Two years later, only half of the air of that over pressured balloon has been let out, and there remains at least 3 to 4 trillion dollars yet to be deflated from the economy before normalcy is reached, and the tulips have wilted.  And that may take much longer than our patience will support.

No politician is going to tell her/his constituents that they've been living for sometime way beyond their means, their contribution-productivity to society, and that from this point on the standard of living for Americans overall must in fact have to slide down by 20 to 30 percent – affluentocrats, of course, will fare better – with millions losing their jobs, including the tenth of a million baristas serving Starbucks' overpriced lattes.  Rest assured that no politician is about to commit hara-kiri; that lies will overwhelm truth.

McCain and Obama both offer change.  But change is already here… without them.  Of course, we are referring to economic change.  In our self-denial we continue to say that we are going through an economic crisis, when what we are starting to experience now is a slow descent to economic reality.  Most crises, if properly handled, can often be resolved; reality, however, must be accepted for what it is. 

As for change in foreign policy, that won't occur no matter who's elected.  We are well aware, and McCain has already made his feelings well known, that his trigger-happy finger will press that nuclear button fast and often as necessary to obliterate any Muslim nation in the Middle East, or for that matter, Russia or anyone else, so as to teach them a lesson.  And to reinforce his tough guy image, he maintains that "if it had been up to him" he would have dropped many more nuclear bombs on Japan back in 1945!

Unfortunately, Obama's handlers feel that, if in a more humane way, he still must echo some of the same sentiments as McCain.  And to comply, he has used his oratory in harsh denunciations of Iran, Pakistan and Russia.  In our incestuous and imperialistic politics, a candidate talks tough or he won't get elected.  McCain needs not convince us of his inhumane and warmongering traits, we believe him; but one hopes that Obama's unnecessary saber-rattling ceases the day he's sworn in as president of the United States; assuming sanity prevails at the polls on November 4 and his margin of victory is sufficiently large so that the US Supreme Court is not involved in the outcome.

But for now, we must consider this static duo of Obama and McCain as… dumb and dumber on the economy; and dumb and dumber on foreign policy as well.

(c) 2008 Ben Tanosborn

Ben Tanosborn an editor of MWC News, after completing graduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), set out for a career in international business that would take him to five continents, expose him to several cultures and make him realize the importance for any and all Americans to become goodwill ambassadors for the United States.
Other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Ben-Tanosborn

This_Category
Category:: Editorial

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1634

Comments (5)
RSS comments
1. 02-10-2008 09:37
nukes on Japan
Very very very true, all of it! And too sad that it is. Bailout without reform is not good enough.  
 
About Mccain saying he would have dropped more nukes on Japan, I hope he did not really say that. One, it is not a tough guy but more of a wise guy (mafia) attitude, and two, all the a bombs were already dropped on them. There were only two a-bombs, no more were made at the time, not counting one other set off to test it in the desert. So how would he have dropped more when they did not exist? Never mind that Japan offered conditional surrender after the first and then unconditional after the second bombing (nuclear bombing of a civilian city, by the way). So dropping more bombs, which america did not have yet, just to show he's a "tough" guy? The statement would make him a craven jerk and also really ignorant. And stupid, since it might have pushed Japan to revoke its surrender or to take up terrorism in retaliation. I hope he did not really say it, but it would not surprise me if he did.
Guest
flower-child
2. 02-10-2008 10:48
Nukes on Japan
Thank you for your comment, Flower-Child. 
That item is taken from a letter written by a reputable lady who, with her husband, spent a vacation in Turtle Island (Fiji) with John McCain, his wife Cindy and their children (including Bridget, their adopted Bangladeshi child). It took place before McCain’s last run at the GOP presidential nomination in 2000. 
In her letter, she details instances of racial prejudice and sexual improprieties that I prefer not to touch on without a second sources, although after reading volumes on this man I would readily believe. 
You are quite right about the number of nukes available to the US in that summer of 1945, something that was probably irrelevant to him in his demonstration of ugly hate and “bully-ness.” The applicable paragraph in the letter reads: 
“Given McCain’s personal experiences with the horrors of war I had expected a more balanced point of view. I commented on the tragic consequences of the nuclear attacks on Japan during WWII. He went on to say that if it was up to him he would have dropped more nuclear bombs on Japan.” 
Yes, a sad commentary for someone who aspires to the presidency of the United States. 
 
Ben
Guest
ben@tanosborn.comNOSPAM! ">Ben Tanosborn
3. 03-10-2008 20:19
Why Isn't Anyone Telling Us The WHOLE T
Are we under Martial Law already? Have US news outlets been made an offer they can't refuse from the Bush-Cheney-Paulson Mafioso? It seems this country's media is absolutely CLUELESS about the economic calamity and civil unrest that is about to take place...All I hear on the news is kids singing songs of Obama and whether Obama farted today and where and the duration of it. This is absolutely INSANE! 
 
Surely SOMEONE in the know can understand that the govts of Ireland and Greece just went INSOLVENT by insuring ALL bank deposits (which total more than their GDPs)?!? How about Bush deploying a US Army BRIGADE from the 3rd Infantry Division -- A COMBAT UNIT -- on American soil "to help with civil unrest and crowd control." Isn't THIS news anymore? These aren't your normal everyday Riot Police or National Guard! They're COMBAT TROOPS!! 
 
What about Paulson. Is he the Antichrist? He CREATED THIS MESS with the derivatives products dreamed up at GS on his watch...Now he's come back to save our @sses? Are you kidding me? Bonnie Frank, Chris Dodd - the original "we don't WANT any regulation of Fannie or Freddie, thank you very much - are also supposed to get us out of this?  
 
I withdrew $5,000 cash today and the teller didn't even have to go to the vault or get authorization...It was at her teller window! Nobody was cashing paychecks on a Friday afternoon...Am I the only one who finds that a tad strange? 
 
I can't figure out WHY we aren't be told -- and WARNED -- that the World as we know it is about to take a step backwards by 50, 100, possibly 200 YEARS...Everyone is going about their lives like this is just a mild storm that'll blow over soon. Just unbelievable!! Are the talking heads just clueless about our impending financial collapse or is there a more sinister force at work here keeping the silence? 
 
When a hurricane is on the way, they get in the middle of the storm and broadcast for hours on end...Are we really just secure and confident that our corrupt govt will always have our best interests at heart and never let our country implode? 
 
Sorry for the rant...I'm mostly just peed off that our own govt sowed the seeds of our destruction and the terrorists just have to sit back and watch it all unfold. :(
Guest
doreneb@bellsouth.netNOSPAM! ">scaredashell
4. 03-10-2008 22:36
Why Isn't Anyone Telling Us The WHOLE T
Hi, 
I would prefer that my e-mail address not be posted in public. Please change that for me. And I was actually seeking your opinion on why nobody seems to be sounding alarm bells in our dire situation...Thank you.
Guest
doreneb@bellsouth.netNOSPAM! ">scaredashell
5. 04-10-2008 06:04
Why Isn't Anyone Telling Us The WHOLE T
I have been watching this lunacy unfold over the last few years, I think from 9/11. 
Watching a nation hell bent in spending itself into oblivion on unnecessary wars. 
Playing wizardry with its economy and the markets. 
A simple man might ask,"If the system is sound, how come its in such a damn mess?".  
Producing 6% of the worlds oil, but using 25% of it, it really is a beast that cannot be controlled. 
Good questions 'scaredashell'. 
What's this about the 3rd Infantry Division, I do not live in the USA, I did hear something, but the media being what it is, it faded fast. 
Actually the only troops I see in public here in OZ. are either marching at an ANZAC day parade, shopping or going to and from the local Navy Base.(I hope it remains thus). 
 
Mike
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ben Tanosborn Wall Street Bush's Legacy Genocide Depression
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: