Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow The Wizards of Washington
Dec 05 2008
The Wizards of Washington | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Sheldon Richman   

Translation

The Wizards of WashingtonImage

Remember that scene in The Wizard of Oz when Toto reveals the “great and powerful wizard” as nothing but a homunculus operating an imposing thunder-and-lightning machine? “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain,” he bellows, not knowing enough to quit even when he’s exposed.

The government’s response to the current economic turmoil reminds me of that scene. We are assured by the awe-inspiring U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve that if we trust them with essential control of the American economy, all will be set right.

Behind the curtain, however, are just a bunch of bureaucrats who couldn’t possibly put the economy right because no one can know how to do that. They would be better able to give a cowardly lion courage, a tin man a heart, or a scarecrow a brain.

Sloppy metaphors to the contrary, an economy is not an engine that occasionally needs a mechanic to go under the hood to tune it up. An economy is people pursuing their preferences by engaging in endless varieties of exchanges with others while coordinating disparate plans founded on unspoken expectations. It’s an amazingly orderly process — when it is allowed to operate in peace and without government intervention.

Unfortunately, governments rarely let it operate in peace. Government planning is power, and with only a few exceptions, most people attracted to top government jobs want to wield power. While they are incapable of fixing an economy — if that means restoring it to its consumer-serving function — they are capable of skewing it to their own purposes.

Government interference with the economic process represents a substitution of political for consumer objectives. In a freely functioning economy — absent government privileges and burdens — entrepreneurs work to arrange the productive process ultimately to satisfy consumers’ subjective preferences. This idea is implicit in the very concepts production, investment, and labor. Their fruits must have value in the eyes of consumers or they are not productive.

Thus when government “creates jobs” or saves companies by taking money from the private sector, it is not truly productive activity. Rather, the government has preempted the economic process, forbidding it to serve consumers so that it can instead serve the objectives of politicians and bureaucrats.

President-elect Obama’s chief of staff-designate, Rahm Emanuel, says, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. Things that we had postponed for too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before.” Emanuel here unwittingly affirms Robert Higgs’s thesis in Crisis and Leviathan: government will use a crisis (real, exaggerated, or imagined) to expand its power. And Emanuel clearly grasps Higgs’s corollary: when the crisis subsides, the new powers will not be shed. Some will remain in force; others will be put on the shelf to await the next crisis.

The current financial turmoil is a textbook illustration of Higgs’s principle. In just the last few months the Fed and Treasury have engaged in activities they had not dared engage in before, such as bailing out investment banks and insurance companies and buying shares in banks. The precedent has been set. Next time, such activity will be even easier.

None of this will fix the economy. The federal government as of late November had committed more than $7 trillion to the financial system in loan purchases and guarantees of various sorts. But Treasury borrowing only moves money from point A to point B, while Fed policy creates money out of thin air. Every dollar the Treasury borrows is a dollar the private sector can’t invest in consumer-oriented projects, and every dollar the Fed creates distorts the economy by transferring purchasing power from the people to privileged interests. The resulting economy is built on false signals and expectations — which can’t be sustained without government support. That is hardly the route to sustainable economic growth.

When you recall that today’s economic turmoil is the direct result of earlier distortions from government policies — guarantees to lenders, so-called affordable-housing policies, et cetera — it is clear that ground is being seeded for the next crisis.

At our peril do we pay no attention to those men behind the curtain.

Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation (www.fff.org) and editor of The Freeman magazine.

Mr. Richman's articles on population, federal disaster assistance, international trade, education, the environment, American history, foreign policy, privacy, computers, and the Middle East have appeared in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, American Scholar, Chicago Tribune, USA Today, Washington Times, Insight, Cato Policy Report, Journal of Economic Development, The Freeman, The World & I, Reason, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Middle East Policy, Liberty magazine, and other publications. He is a contributor to the Fortune Encyclopedia of Economics. Articles by Sheldon Richman at MWC News http://mwcnews.net/sheldon-richman 

This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 732

Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 06-12-2008 03:34
The Wizard of Oz or Mickey Mouse?
Although in general agreement with Mr. Richman's article I have some difficulty with his postulates about what an economy is.  
The phrase “people pursuing their preferences” should be qualified with the fact that peoples’ preferences are generally set for them by an endless barrage of programming and conditioning, the end result of which, while they are disparate in their capacity for attainment they are pretty much aligned in terms of the goals. 
I also take issue with the phrase “endless varieties of exchanges” and the use of “with others” as if these others were others among them in some kind of barter society. That of course is all the myth of sanitised economic theory that we are all supposed to believe in, yet another con-job from the men behind the curtain. It belongs to the realm of people making informed decisions to exchange in win-win transactions. What rubbish! People’s aspirations are a home, which they rent or buy and if they buy they have a mortgage and either way they are plugged into slavery to that large mass of free capital out there that is the real economy. Next they want a car, to which similar financial arrangements apply, except that this is an expensive consumer item which they will purchase from one of a narrow selection of large corporations. Next there is food consumption which, although subject to variety in preferences, the whole range of variety is procured, warehoused and retailed by a few large corporations who operate supermarket chains. And finally we have consumable household goods like kitchen appliances, televisions, computers and so on. 
 
My point is that the whole consumer economy, the system that supposedly is driven by, participated in and controlled by, and serves the needs of ordinary people is in fact a distinct layer of activity underlying the real economy and entirely separate from it. To say that all this is “Part of” or “Comprises” the economy is akin to saying that the battery hens feeding in the cages of a poultry farm are participating in the economics of the poultry industry. 
 
People need to realise that they are subject to and at the mercy of a set of controlled activities that have nothing to do with “The Economy”. 
 
The economy is all about the accumulation of capital and the exchanges associated with it’s fluctuating value. While it is true that there are “mums and dads” investors out there most ordinary people don’t even control their pension funds and the vast majority of this “economic activity” is entirely conducted by a small percentage of the population, the powerful and wealthy who own capital or have political power or both. Of course, it is all funded and kept alive by the battery hens in the poultry farms that underpin it all but really their only significance or influence is in respect of who owns and controls the most battery hens. 
 
The idea that we, the ordinary people in any way determine the “economy” is the illusion that “the American Dream” propagates and would like you to keep believing. 
 
The sooner people come to realise that public and democratic control of that REAL ECONOMY out there, BY the people FOR the people is the key to freedom the sooner they will rise up and smash this perpetual motion machine that serves the interests of the few people who control it, not the people trapped inside it on their treadmills. 
 
However this “economic crisis” unfolds it will be summarised when it is all over as a poultry industry overhaul, some poultry farms changed ownership, some were burnt down some were expanded or new ones built and the owners of the poultry farms will smoke a few cigars over a bottle of whisky and reminisce while the chickens go on pecking at the feed trays and hoping for a better future as they have always done.
Registered

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Sheldon Richman American economy U.S. Treasury Federal Reserve
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: