Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Bulletin arrow New Artic Meltdown Rates Cut Little Icewith Governments
Dec 19 2008
New Artic Meltdown Rates Cut Little Icewith Governments | Print |  E-mail
Bulletin
By MWC News   

Translation

New Artic Meltdown Rates Cut Little Icewith Governments
By Dr. Andrew GliksonImage

It is a good question whether the Australian government, having effectively abandoned any meaningful attempt at the arrest of accelerating climate change, would have changed its White Paper in view of rising melt rates of Arctic Sea ice, which acts as the Earth's thermostat, and which has already decreased from 8 to 4 million km2 and is projected to vanish within the next 5 years or so (see here.)

Mean temperatures over the Arctic Sea, increased by about 3C and locally by 5C over the last 4 years, compared to the earlier long-term mean, heralds a new climate pattern in the northern hemisphere, including advanced melt of Greenland ice sheet over the next few decades, raising sea levels by several metres.

According to Julienne Stroeve (US National Snow and Ice Data Center) report to the American Geophysical Union, the process affects the temperature gradient between the Arctic and the equator and precipitation patterns. Oceanic currents and atmospheric circulation extend the effects to the Southern Hemisphere,  where the western Antarctica Wilkins ice shelf has undergone mid-winter breakdown.

Not that this will cut too much ice with Governments, where not everyone accepts the reality of human-triggered global temperature and sea level rise, currently at 0.35 cm/year, near-double late 20th century rates

A diabolical combination of factors is retarding efforts at controlling escalation of CO2 rise, currently at 2.2 ppm/year, from raising atmospheric energy levels above the 1.6 Watt/m2 already triggered by emission of 305 billion tons of Carbon and by land clearing.

First, despite overwhelming scientific evidence, the counterintuitive nature of global warming and consequent denial relegate dangerous climate change, in the eyes of most, to the realm of science fiction.

It is counterintutive, yet proven, that a rise of atmospheric CO2 by about 100 ppm raises mean global temeprature by at least 1 degrees Celsius, plus another 1 to 2 degrees C due to carbon cycle and ice melt feedbacks, pushing the atmosphere to conditions of 3 million years ago (mid-Pliocene) when sea levels rose by 25 metres. It is equally counterintutive, yet demonstrated, that a rise of atmospheric CO2 by several hundred ppm has resulted in a mass extinction about 55 million years ago.

Second, the powerful effect of vested interests, the fossil fuel companies, exert decisive influence on governments of all political shades, whether Howard's conservatives or the one described by Paul Kelly as the "green Howard", stating "Rudd's emission policy is a work of political genius that would make John Howard proud" (The Australian, 17.12.08).

In succeeding to achieve an almost perfect balance between political, social and economic forces, Rudd ovelooks the most decisive factor, namely, the increasingly dangerous atmospheric processes can hardly be expected to play ball with the government's policies (wouldn't it be nice if they did?).

By most accounts the government is no longer listening to climate science, as communicated by leading international scientists and science organizations.

But if the first duty of governments is to protect the people, including the young and future generations, that they don't get it, or have sold out to vested interests, will not be an excuse when it is too late to attempt to control the worst consequences of their inaction.

Not to decide is to decide.

Dr. Andrew Glikson
Earth and paleoclimate scientist
Australian National University

This_Category
Category:: Bulletin

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 941

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 28-12-2008 17:15
it does seem k.rudd has stolen the green vote, stomped on the mandate, committed us to horror and governed not for the people but the industries. it would be a good day when government started governing for the people, becoming a democracy instead of a plutocracy.
Guest
2. 28-12-2008 21:37
Oz Government betrays Oz & Planet
Excellent article by top Australian National University (ANU) palaeo-climate scientist Dr Andrew Glikson and excellent comment by karma. 
 
Australia is the world’s biggest coal exporter, the worst per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) polluter in the developed world, and one of the worst annual per capita greenhouse polluters in the world as a whole – and it accordingly would be disingenuous and indeed dishonest to IGNORE (as does Mainstream Australia) Australia’s huge Exported CO2 pollution in calculating Australia’s annual per capita GHG pollution. Thus if Australia didn’t extract fossil fuel and sell it then it this fuel wouldn’t get burned - we are responsible for our actions and the only way Australia would be innocent of the GHG pollution consequences of coal and LNG burning would be if it sold the coal and LNG overseas on the strict condition that it would NOT be burned). 
 
 
 
In 2000 Australia’s Domestic plus Exported GHG pollution (tonnes CO2-e per person per year) was 44.2 versus 3.9 for the annual per capita GHG pollution by China; Australia's 2008 per capita GHG is about 53. Based on US Energy Information Administration (US EIA) data projections and Labor GHG pollution policy (and assuming population stasis at 21 million) Australia’s Domestic plus Exported CO2-e pollution will reach 59 in 2020 (15 times China’s 2000 annual per capita GHG pollution value) and 75.5 by 2050 (19 times China’s 2000 value of 3.9; 33 times Pakistan’s 2000 value of 2.3; 40 times India’s 2000 value of 1.9; and 84 times Bangladesh’s 2000 value of 0.9) (see: List of countries by 2000 annual per capita Greenhouse gas pollution ). 
 
 
 
The extraordinary international disparity and the extraordinary current Australian “exceptionalism” (it is operationally OK for Australia but not for others; Australia will reduce its per capita GHG pollution only if China reduces its too) brings to mind other extraordinary mathematical statements of White Australian “exceptionalism” in relation to Chinese from Australia’s non-politically correct (non-PC) past. 
 
 
 
Thus in 1947 then Labor Immigration Minister (and later Labor leader) Arthur Calwell notoriously stated that “Two Wongs do not make a White” (for context and documentation see p183, “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability“:Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History )– however, as indicated above, the current Australian Labor Federal Government is evidently aiming for a circa TWENTY (20)-fold disparity. 
 
For the latest quantitative and documented analyses of the accelerating Climate Emergency see the Climate Emergency fact sheets and analyses of the Melbourne-based Yarra Valley Climate Action Group: Yarra Valley Climate Action Group.
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Andrew Glikson Australia Artic Meltdown Icewith
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: