Home arrow Commentary arrow Editorial arrow Corporate Media, the IFJ and Women
Mar 14 2009
Corporate Media, the IFJ and Women | Print |  E-mail
Editorial
By Ben Tanosborn   

Translation

Could women's governance bring truth and peace?Image

On March 8 we came together to celebrate International Women’s Day, 92 years to the day after Russian women had marched to strike for “bread and peace” in a Russia that had seen 2 million of its soldiers dead (World War One) and with an ongoing famine enveloping parts of the nation. 

Four days later, the Czar had abdicated, and the provisional government that took over granted women the right to vote.  All in all, this is probably one of the greatest, if not the greatest, feat for women throughout the world.  A milestone moment that inspired, as well as instigated, more than nine decades of women’s struggle for equality, justice, peace and personal development in just about all corners of the planet.

To me, however, International Women’s day has a greater significance than just being a time to reflect on the international women’s movement and the progress made to date in its demands for the participation of women in both the political and the economic process.  And that greater significance transcends the gender issue, and the status that women may have in some regions of the world where culture and religion play strong, consequential roles in creating gender inequalities, or extreme differentiation.

So far we’ve measured women’s progress solely in terms of how, as a group, women are closing the gap of equality or, rather, inequality versus men.  In societies with a lesser gender differentiation, the so-called modern, enlightened nations, or groups of nations, that gap has usually been narrowed down to economic oppression and gender-associated salary distinctions or promotion barriers for women – the ignominious “glass ceiling,” a critical focus point in feminism and women’s studies. 

No, it was not a moment of divine revelation I underwent five years ago; nor was it brought about by a specific event in the Cowboy’s perverted, anti-democratic type of governing from the White House that brought me to see a light of hope.  And that light came on as I reached the conclusion that, if the world were to be saved, it would have to occur by having women in charge; or, at least holders of some form of veto power to keep men’s perennial attitudes – or is it attributes? – of hostility and dominance in check.  Not just here in the United States but elsewhere in the world; not just in nations holding major military and economic power but in nations yet developing, aspiring to be served at the same table as the rest.

Fat chance for that to occur!  Men may tolerate gradual change in the empowerment of women; but for now, or the near future, they are totally unwilling to abdicate ultimate power.  Even in what we surmise to be women-friendly fields, such as journalism, gender inequality is rampant.  And it is precisely this journalistic platform from where women could exert enormous influence; influence which could transform the political and social makeup of nations.  But the corporate media keeps suffocating any possible reporting by top women journalists that may challenge the existing status quo.  Many of us wonder, for example, the de facto silencing of Christiane Amanpour, CNN’s Chief International Correspondent, on many issues where she could have offered both clarity and credibility; issues too incandescent, however, for brainwashed American audiences.

It is the assessment of the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) that women journalists are at a clear disadvantage when it comes to their professional status within the corporate media.  According to the IFJ, using statistics compiled and made available in the last three years, only 29 percent of the news were being written by women journalists… well, only 23 percent, really, of what are considered “serious” news, their coverage and writing of the news more often than not being relegated to news dealing with family or social affairs, art, lifestyle and entertainment-related.

Perhaps the most critical statistic is being provided by the Canadian Daily Newspaper Association which offers a possible answer to the problem of entrenchment in the existing political status quo: only 8 percent of the chief editors, and 12 percent of all editors in Canada, are women.  These are alarming figures for supposedly one of the more enlightened nations in gender-equality; a nation not far behind Russia and Sweden in the proportion of women working in the communication media.  It is definitely a major challenge to have women occupying the top journalistic ranks.  Save rare exceptions, such as the ding-a-ling Wall Street cheerleaders for CNBC, we – men and women alike – tend to place greater trust in women journalists than we do in men.

Would we in America have allowed the cover-up of the Fallujah, Haditha and other horrific crimes perpetrated by the US military in Iraq had there been women in charge of reporting such news?  Or, for that matter, the actions of American soldiers two years ago when destroying the Baghdad offices of the Iraq Syndicate of Journalists… just because they would not endorse US policy and actions?  I would like to think not.

Perhaps the IFJ next year, as it holds its triennial congress, can make it more than just a token issue to bring to the forum the need for a far greater leadership role by women in journalism.  By so doing, we would be taking great strides, not just in narrowing the gender gap but in serving humanity better through truth and, hopefully,  a much greater chance at peace.

© 2009 Ben Tanosborn

Ben Tanosborn an editor of MWC News, after completing graduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), set out for a career in international business that would take him to five continents, expose him to several cultures and make him realize the importance for any and all Americans to become goodwill ambassadors for the United States.
Other articles by this author
http://mwcnews.net/Ben-Tanosborn

This_Category
Category:: Editorial

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1191

Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 16-03-2009 06:12
Anglo-Zionist war on women & children
Rape is an horrendous act of violence but even worse is death of a child. I asked a Muslim-origin female friend what would be worse for her, rape or the death of a child; she replied, of course, \"the death of a child\". 
 
Women (and men) must stand up for the innocent children being remorselessly sacrificed on the altars of racist, resource-driven globalized capitalism and US-UK \"democratic imperialism\" (democratic tyranny and indeed \"democratic Nazism\").  
 
16 million people die avoidably each year of whom 10 million are under-5 year old infants (see Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950) .  
 
Each day about 1,000 under-5 year old infants die in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories (see: UNICEF infant mortality statistics.  
 
Due to US Alliance and Zionist war crimes, the \"annual death rate\" is 1.6% (Occupied Palestinian under-5 year old infants), 2.5% (Occupied Iraqi under-5 year old infants) and 6.3% (Occupied Afghan under-5 year old infants) - as compared to 10% for Australian POWs of the Japanese in WW2 (for which war crimes Japanese generals were tried and hung). 
 
Most notable is the anniversary of Russian women successfully demanding \"bread and peace\" towards the end of Russia\'s involvement in WW1 - their actions were unsuccessfully countered by Allied-backed Zionists. According to eminent British historian of WW1, WW2, the Jewish Holocaust, Jewish history and Churchill, Professor Sir Martin Gilbert, in his huge book \"First World War\" (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1994), the Balfour Declaration for a \"Jewish Homeland\" in Arab Palestine was issued \"hoping in part that Russian Jews might be influenced to urge their compatriots to go on fighting ... It was too late to restore the disintegrating situation. Nothing, however attractive to a minority, or tempting in the long term, could counter the great swell of anti-war opinion\".  
 
The Zionist pro-war and racist invasion, occupation and ethnic cleansing agenda is still with us, dominating the US political establishment and responsible (together with oil and Anglo-American resource strategy) for the continuing active and passive slaughter of the innocents on the Zionist promoted \"war on terror\" - in reality an horrendous war on Arab, Muslim, Asian and non-European women and children. 
 
The women of the world (and men) should stand up to the mass murdering, mass paedocidal, racist Zionists (RZs) and Anglo-American imperialists and demand an end to the cowardly and racist Anglo-Zionist war on women and children.
Guest
gpolya@bigpond.comNOSPAM! ">Dr Gideon Polya

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Ben Tanosborn International Women’s Day Corporate Media IFJ
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: