Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Why Not Permanently Cancel Aid to Honduras?
Jul 10 2009
Why Not Permanently Cancel Aid to Honduras? | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By MWC News   

Translation

ImageWhy Not Permanently Cancel Aid to Honduras?
by Jacob G. Hornberger

I’ve got good news and bad news about the coup in Honduras. The good news is that the U.S. government has suspended $16.5 million in military-assistance programs to Honduras and threatened that another $180 million in aid could be at risk. The bad news is that it’s only a temporary suspension and only a threat of a cutoff, not a permanent termination of foreign aid to Honduras and its military.

That’s almost $200 million that the U.S. Empire is funneling into the coffers of Honduran officials, including those in the military. That is not a small amount of money. That large sum of money ends up in the pockets of thousands of Honduran politicians, bureaucrats, and military personnel. At the same time, it produces a deep sense of Honduran dependency on the U.S. Empire as well as a deep sense of loyalty and servitude to the Empire.

Meanwhile here at home, most everyone knows that the U.S. Empire is bankrupting America with its out-of-control spending, on both domestic and foreign programs. With the feds continuing to spend considerably more money than they bring in with taxes, the national debt continues to soar. Massive currency debasement lies on the horizon.

Yet, in the minds of many, the Empire continues to be a permanent given. No matter how bad things get at home, the Empire just continues doling out money to foreign militaries and foreign regimes with nary a concern about the adverse economic effects here at home. The Empire might suspend the payment of its military dole to Honduras and threaten a cut-off of other funds, but everyone knows that the largess will continue flowing as soon as Honduran officials do what Empire officials want.

How much economic abuse will the American people permit themselves to be subjected to at the hands of Empire officials before they finally say, “Enough is enough”? The U.S. government has no more business taxing Americans to send foreign-aid loot to Honduras than to any other foreign regime. Don’t Americans have the right to decide what to do with their own money rather than having it forcibly taken from them by the IRS so that it can be sent to politicians, bureaucrats, and military personnel in the Honduran government?

What if the Honduran government cannot afford a big and powerful military without U.S. Empire largess? Well, that’s just tough. It will mean that they will just have to do with a military they can afford, which might mean a few hundred soldiers. Of course, the primary beneficiary of that phenomenon would be the Honduran people, who would no longer be subjected to the brutality of their government’s military personnel, many of whom, by the way, have been trained in brutality and torture at the U.S. Army’s School of the Americas.

Today, the American people are stuck in a very precarious economic quagmire. On the domestic side, they are dependent upon their socialistic welfare state, especially Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

Further on the domestic side, they remain committed to the war on drugs, despite its manifest 35-year-old failure. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

Further on the domestic side, they continue to believe that massive federal spending will stimulate them to economic prosperity. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

Further on the domestic side, the national debt, both principal and interest, continues to soar. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

On the foreign side, Americans remain committed to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

Further on the foreign side, they remain devoted to the U.S. Empire’s network of worldwide military bases, its role as the world’s international policeman, and its program of interventionism. Thus, significant expenditure reduction is unlikely here.

It would seem, however, that if there were ever an area of federal expenditures that the American people could agree should be eliminated, it is foreign aid. What better place to start than a permanent cancellation of the $200 million being sent annually to the Honduran government?

Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation, publisher of Your Money or Your Life: Why We Must Abolish the Income Tax by Sheldon Richman. 


This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 968

Comments (6)
RSS comments
1. 10-07-2009 17:07
Amazing fiction
An amazing work of fiction, particularly the part about the School of the Americas, which the US government closed almost nine years ago. Why do I write, when I work at the successor institute? Because I am a retired Army officer, and the people who taught at the school were my peers. I take great offense at those who libel them with no evidence whatsoever. So, Mr. Hornberger, show one fact--just one--that indicates the school had a negative impact on anyone at any time? If you do, you will be the very first. The misinformation on this topic destroys your credibility in talking about the rest.
Guest
lee.rials@us.army.milNOSPAM! ">Lee A. Rials
2. 10-07-2009 22:55
Amazing fiction
I wanna know what all the money goes to down there i have been there and the tgu roads are shitty grabage everywhere where does the money go ...... the people are nice
Guest
3. 11-07-2009 11:30
Reply to Lee Rials
Mr. Rials: 
 
Have you forgotten the infamous torture manuals that the School of the Americas was handing out to Latin American military thugs who were attending the school, many of whom returned to their countries and murdered, tortured, sexually abused, raped, and terrorized their own citizenry? To begin educating yourself on the truth and reality of the this notorious institution, under both its old name and new name, you can begin by reading this article entitled “Backyard Terrorism” by George Monbiot in the October 30, 2001, issue of The Guardian, where the author states: 
 
“Until January this year, Whisc was called the \"School of the Americas\", or SOA. Since 1946, SOA has trained more than 60,000 Latin American soldiers and policemen. Among its graduates are many of the continent\'s most notorious torturers, mass murderers, dictators and state terrorists. As hundreds of pages of documentation compiled by the pressure group SOA Watch show, Latin America has been ripped apart by its alumni.” 
http://tinyurl.com/6fdu5b 
 
From there, I recommend reading the following book on this infamous institution: 
 
The School of the Americas: Military Training and Violence in the Americas by Leslie Gill 
http://tinyurl.com/nysp6u 
 
You’ll find an excellent review of the book by Peter Kornbluh that appeared in the October 31, 2004, issue of the Washington Post and which is posted at the website of School of the Americas Watch, where he writes: 
 
“One of SOA Watch\'s singular achievements was to obtain through the Freedom of Information Act a comprehensive list of the school\'s 60,000 graduates. The roster of alumni is a Who\'s Who of the most infamous dictators, death-squad directors and mass murderers in the Western Hemisphere -- if not the world. Panama\'s Gen. Manuel Noriega, who now resides in a Florida prison for international narcotics trafficking, is an SOA alum. So was the godfather of the Salvadoran death squads, Roberto D\'Aubuisson, who masterminded the 1980 murder of Archbishop Oscar Romero and hundreds of other killings. So was the violent former dictator of Bolivia Gen. Hugo Banzer. The list goes on and on.” 
http://tinyurl.com/ly7f5x 
 
I doubt whether the Latin American victims who have suffered the horrors that were inflicted upon them by graduates of the School of the Americas (and who are still alive) would consider what was done to them “fiction” any more than, for that matter, the victims of the murder, torture, rape, and sex abuse at Abu Ghraib would. 
 
Finally, your point about libel is a silly one, especially since the law has long recognized that truth is an absolute defense to a libel action. 
 
Jacob Hornberger 
President 
The Future of Freedom Foundation 
www.fff.org
Guest
jhornberger@fff.orgNOSPAM! ">Jacob Hornberger
4. 13-07-2009 19:11
Truth
Mr. Hornberger, strange that you quote people who cannot link one crime by anyone to anything taught at the school. Why don't you find just one person who used what he learned there to commit a crime? If you do, you will be the very first. Stunning that you quote Mr. Kornbluh, talking about Lesley Gill's book, a book that despite her actually being at the school for a short time, still offers nothing worth saying about it. Do you know how many of those 60,000 have even been accused of any crime? About 600. Do you know how many have been accused of any serious human rights crimes? Maybe 200. If the school were trying to teach something evil, it did a poor job of it. But have you considered just how absurd it is to say "SOA graduate" without any context (when did he go, how long did he stay, what was the subject of the course, what does that have to do with later behavior?)? Just looking at the ridiculous linkage made with the Honduran generals. Gen. Vasquez was at the school when he was a 2nd Lt. 33 years ago for a basic course of 18 weeks. He came back as a captain in 1984 for a four-week course in training small units. Can you seriously ascribe his acts now, a quarter-century later, to those few weeks long ago? SOAWatch has perpetrated a fraud on the people who truly care about the region and its people by distracting them from the very real problems they face. The school, closed nine years ago, was not one of those problems. Next time, come see for yourself, but don't quote these know-nothing ideologues who couldn't name a course taught at WHINSEC if their lives depended on it.
Guest
lee.rials@us.army.milNOSPAM! ">Lee A. Rials
5. 14-07-2009 07:31
Second reply to Lee Rials
Mr. Rials, 
 
I repeat: Have you simply forgotten about the infamous torture memos that the School of the Americas was handing out to its attendees? Are you honestly claiming that the SOA is not morally responsible for the torture and other acts of brutality that were committed by SOA attendees after they were taught such methods at the SOA? 
 
Take a look at this article by Lisa Haugaard from Covert Actions Quarterly which explains what those torture manuals were all about. You will, in fact, see a remarkable similarity between what the SOA’s torture manuals were teaching and what Latin American military thugs were doing to their citizens. (For that matter, you’ll also notice a similarity to the mistreatment to which detainees have been subjected at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and Gitmo prison in Cuba — and, well, also to the methods of interrogation currently being employed by Iranian tyrants against Iranian dissidents.) 
 
Haugaard writes: 
 
“These two CIA textbooks deal exclusively with interrogation and devote an entire chapter each to ‘coercive techniques.’ Human Resource Exploitation recommends surprising suspects in the predawn hours, arresting, blindfolding, and stripping them naked. Suspects should be held incommunicado, it advises, and deprived of normal routines in eating and sleeping. Interrogation rooms should be windowless, sound proof, dark, and without toilets. The manuals do admonish that torture techniques can backfire and that the threat of pain is often more effective than pain itself. However, they then go on to describe coercive techniques ‘to induce psychological regression in the subject by bringing a superior outside force to bear on his will to resist.’ These techniques include prolonged constraint, prolonged exertion, extremes of heat, cold, or moisture, deprivation of food or sleep, disrupting routines, solitary confinement, threats of pain, deprivation of sensory stimuli, hypnosis, and use of drugs or placebos.” 
 
According to this article by Dana Priest of the Washington Post, 
 
“U.S. Army intelligence manuals used to train Latin American military officers at an Army school from 1982 to 1991 advocated executions, torture, blackmail and other forms of coercion against insurgents, Pentagon documents released yesterday show. Used in courses at the U.S. Army’s School of the Americas, the manual says that to recruit and control informants, counterintelligence agents could use ‘fear, payment of bounties for enemy dead, beatings, false imprisonment, executions and the use of truth serum,’ according to a secret Defense Department summary of the manuals compiled during a 1992 investigation of the instructional material and also released yesterday.” 
 
I repeat: Are you seriously claiming that the School of the Americas can avoid moral responsibility for the murders, torture, beatings, indefinite detentions, waterboarding, rapes, sex abuse, and other acts of brutality committed by Latin American military thugs who were provided with a copy of the SOA torture manuals?  
 
Moreover, don’t you consider it somewhat bizarre that the U.S. military, the institution that has engaged in torture, sex abuse, rape, kidnapping, rendition, indefinite detention, denial of due process, kangaroo tribunals, denial of trial by jury, coerced confessions, denial of speedy trials, and denial of habeas corpus, is serving as our nation’s self-appointed teacher of democracy, human rights, and criminal justice?  
 
Finally, isn’t it time we asked: What business does the U.S. government have training foreign militaries? The time is long past to cease this imperial nonsense. All it succeeds in accomplishing is creating more enemies for the American people, which means more infringements on civil liberties here at home, not to mention the increasing prospect of national financial bankruptcy from the out-of-control federal spending to pay for it all. 
 
Jacob Hornberger
Guest
jhornberger@fff.orgNOSPAM! ">Jacob Hornberger
6. 14-07-2009 07:41
supplimental second reply to Lee Rials
Mr. Rials, 
 
My 3 links didn't go through. Here they are: 
 
1. Article by Lisa Haugaard: 
http://www.soaw.org/newswire_detail.php?id=559 
 
2. Reference to Iranian tyrants' interrogation methods: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/04/world/middleeast/04confess.htm 
 
3. Article by Dana Priest: 
http://www.soaw.org/newswire_detail.php?id=851 
 
Jacob Hornberger
Guest
jhornberger@fff.orgNOSPAM! ">Jacob Hornberger

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Jacob G. Hornberger Honduras Military Aid
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: