Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow What Ted Kennedy Never Learned
Aug 28 2009
What Ted Kennedy Never Learned | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Sheldon Richman   

Translation
Bookmark and Share

ImageWhat Ted Kennedy Never Learned
by Sheldon Richman
 
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy is gone. No one in the last 40 years stood as a larger symbol of “liberalism,” the view that government is the answer for everything. A great deal has been said in recent days about his compassion and generosity. But bear in mind that in public life, his compassion consisted in spending other people’s money and authorizing government bureaucracies to interfere with the social cooperation that takes place whenever life, liberty, and property are respected.
 
We may grant his good intentions, but intentions can’t repeal the laws of economics, and insisting they can only causes harm, especially to the people one was trying to help.
 
In thinking about Kennedy, we ought to be struck by his stubborn refusal to see government for what it is: a device for imposing some people’s will on others by compulsion. That blunt formulation is surely less romantic than any that he would have offered, but which is closer to reality? Stripped of the democratic bunting, what lies at the heart of government is the legal power to coerce — not only violent aggressors but anyone. It’s not reason or eloquence, as George Washington is reputed to have said. It’s force. Believing that this force is wielded in a good cause does not change the facts.

In this light Kennedy and his sort are revealed as presumptuous power-mongers. Sitting in Washington, far (both geographically and psychologically) from the people and their diverse personal circumstances, the “lawmakers” presume to dictate the rules of everyday life. They don’t simply declare that we must not kill or otherwise harm each other. Those customary rules were well-established long before the first legislative body convened. Rather, they seek to manage — even micromanage — the complexity of social intercourse as though it were a family picnic: the minimum wage that employers and employees may negotiate, the conditions under which children are educated, the kind of health insurance we all must buy. This and so much more are, in the so-called “liberals’” eyes, the public’s — that is, their — business.
 
In theory government is supposed to be the servant. Yet in practice it is not the servant but the master. Kennedy surely would have disagreed, and he might have meant it. But facts are facts. When a self-described servant insists on taking care of you according to his notion of your interests, whether or not you want his help and whether or not you want to surrender the necessary resources, he is no servant at all. He is the master. You will be served — or else.
 
Kennedy cared about a lot of things, but he didn’t care enough to grasp that fact.
 
Nor did he care enough to question his simple-minded economic philosophy that whatever government decrees it shall get. The “war on poverty” is 45 years and trillions of dollars old, yet Kennedy never declared victory. Does that mean it wasn’t won? If so, shouldn’t that have prompted him to reject his faith that government can directly end poverty? Why didn’t he learn the authentically liberal insight that the straightest line to prosperity is the free market, which means keeping government from impeding the creation of wealth through taxes, privileges, and restrictions on production?
 
Uncharacteristically, Kennedy glimpsed this truth in the late 1970s. It was he who spearheaded the congressional move to deregulate commercial air travel and trucking. Until then, government bureaucracies strictly regulated both routes and rates, inflating the price of travel and every product carried by truck. Kennedy apparently realized that this system of privilege for politically influential businesses harmed most people by prohibiting competition. As a result, the Civil Aeronautics Board and the Interstate Commerce Commission (the oldest federal regulatory agency) disappeared — to the benefit of the public.
 
Unfortunately, Kennedy never applied this principle to health care or much else. To lower prices and better serve consumers, government didn’t have to run the airlines or the trucking companies, or create a “public option.” It just needed to get out of the way.
 
It’s the same for health care. Too bad Kennedy died before understanding that.
 
Sheldon Richman is policy advisor to The Future of Freedom Foundation (www.fff.org) and editor of The Freeman magazine.

Mr. Richman's articles on population, federal disaster assistance, international trade, education, the environment, American history, foreign policy, privacy, computers, and the Middle East have appeared in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, American Scholar, Chicago Tribune, USA Today, Washington Times, Insight, Cato Policy Report, Journal of Economic Development, The Freeman, The World & I, Reason, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Middle East Policy, Liberty magazine, and other publications. He is a contributor to the Fortune Encyclopedia of Economics. Articles by Sheldon Richman at MWC News http://mwcnews.net/sheldon-richman 

This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 913

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 30-08-2009 02:17
Lessons from the Ignorant Rabble
For someone who has only ever eaten green plums it is understandable that they believe that plums can only be sour and it is impossible for them to imagine the sweet taste of a ripe plum. 
 
But the world is not simply a place in which natural processes produce change and new states beyond the capacity of ordinary minds to imagine; it\'s full of deceptions. 
 
In medieval times people believed that tomatoes were poisonous. They ate from pewter plates. Acid of the tomatoes dissolved the lead and carried it into the bloodstream. In fact, it was not the tomatoes that were poisonous but the lead from the pewter plates. Although the general perception was correct; something was poisonous, just not the tomatoes. 
 
And so it is with government. What the world currently experiences is a sour plum; a puppet-show of democracy in which economic power behind the curtain pulls the strings and the cattle are herded about in the interests of a privileged few who would have us persuaded that the best of all possible worlds will arise from the synergistic effects of individual self-interest, a belief that entails rejection of the power of human reason and all that it has achieved. 
 
This sour plum has persuaded many a blind fool that it is government that is corrupt, incompetent and coercive, not the pewter plate on which it is served up to the masses. 
 
Edward Kennedy was a man who had the vision to imagine what the natural processes of the world can do with a green plum and a steadfast commitment to that vision. 
He also had the wisdom and the knowledge (perhaps because he came from a family who had access to wealth and privilege along with the mental capacity for something more than perverse self-indulgence of it) to see the true poison that afflicts mankind. 
 
Kennedy had faith in human reason to penetrate the mask of ignorance, to identify the true source of the poison and to share the vision of a world that is a sweet plum ripened by the natural outcome of human reason. 
 
Up to my neck in the babble of \"free market forces\" and \"small government\" from the ignorant rabble in the standing area who would purport to give lessons to the likes of Ted Kennedy, I an heart and soul with Kennedy, with his brothers, with human reason and a decent, just, humane world built on respect for life and human dignity.
Guest
allen.jasson@rightofchoice.comNOSPAM! ">Allen L. Jasson
2. 09-10-2009 13:04
Lessons from the Ignorant Rabble
Wow. Sheldon Richman believes the "government is evil" meme. Apparently he doesn't feel that he's "serving" corporations, or if he does that is perfectly acceptable. 
We have a lot of work to do, a lot of educating . .
Guest

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  Sheldon Richman Edward Kennedy
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: