Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Iranian Nuclear Dispute: Resolution, not Humiliation
Sep 21 2009
Iranian Nuclear Dispute: Resolution, not Humiliation | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By William deB. Mills   

Translation
Bookmark and Share

ImageIranian Nuclear Dispute: Resolution, not Humiliation

Treatment by American writers of recent official Washington opinion about the state of Iran's nuclear development seems curious. According to the New York Times, Washington now sees Iran as having the ability to start weaponizing uranium but as voluntarily not taking that step, a situation the Times portrays as raising tensions! If the Iranians are to be accused of raising tensions and provoking Israeli militarists by choosing not to enrich uranium to weapons grade (still long technical steps away from actually building a bomb, much less one that would reliably work or be deliverable), then what does Iran have to do to signal willingness to find a mutually acceptable solution?

For the Israeli right wing and its American supporters, the answer seems to be that both the personal humiliation of Iran's leaders and the broader humiliation of the Islamic regime constitute the minimally acceptable goal.

That is a dangerous strategy, risking either war or a nationalist reaction in Iran that will only work to the benefit of Ahmadinejad and his IRGC backers. Netanyahu is fond of making comparisons between Ahmadinejad and Hitler to pressure historically-challenged Americans into coughing up more political and military support for his expansionist program, but there really is at least one valid comparison between the two...indeed, among all three. Hitler rose to power on a wave of nationalist reaction to the international humiliation inflicted on Germany after World War I, and Ahmadinejad is betting his career that he can ride the same wave in Iran.

First, a politician get voters riled up, focusing on real or imagined foreign insults. The military supports the politician because it is a good way to get a bigger budget and perhaps free arms from foreign patrons. There may or may not be any intention whatsoever of starting a war, but adversaries get nervous, and tensions rise. The more tensions rise, the more self-important (with some reason) the military feels, and the cycle continues...until one way or another, war occurs.

We have just this summer all had a taste of some of the political passions flowing through the veins of Iranians. This society of 70,000,000 has experienced extraordinary events in comparison with the calm lifestyle of Westerners. Provoking a wave of Iranian nationalist outrage would not be good for the world and would certainly not be good for the Israeli people, who number barely a tenth as many.

For those who want to resolve the nuclear dispute with Iran, humiliation is not a rational way forward.

Dr. William deB. Mills is an American political scientist specializing in the future of the global political system. He recently published "Smarter Iran Policy Begins With a New Attitude" and "Gaza: Laboratory for the Power-Hungry" and regularly writes for MWC. Retired from a career in national security, where his final position was Director of Long-Range Analysis at the National Intelligence Council, he now writes a foreign affairs blog is at http://shadowedforest.blogspot.com/

 
This_Category
Category:: Op_ed

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 656

Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 23-09-2009 05:05
No one really wants to resolve the nucle
There is only one real goal of the U.S. and Israel is to use the nuclear issue for an excuse to invade Iran and steal its oil.
Registered
2. 09-10-2009 13:10
Seizing the Oil
Mr. Bradley, 
I would agree that controlling Iran's oil and gas may constitute the core issue (though I would be more inclined to phrase it as "controlling Iran's independent streak"), though there are a number of other reasons for the dispute - and the way they are (intentionally) confused makes it very hard to distinguish them.  
 
For Washington, Iran symbolizes the refusal of all in the world who demand the right to go their own way. The Washington bureaucracy at all levels of management from the White House on down is, despite existing in a democracy, highly arrogant, top-down and control-oriented. What goes for attitude toward civil servants and citizens (who may, for example, demand to know what the decision makers are up to) goes in spades for attitude toward countries that refuse to kowtow. 
 
An independent reason is the desire of rightwing Israeli militarists (the individuals running all major Israeli political parties) to defeat the last opponent to Israeli empire still standing.
Guest
william.deb.mills@verizon.netNOSPAM! ">William deB. Mills

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  William deB. Mills Iranian Nuclear Resolution Israeli militarists
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: