Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Society arrow Zhao Ziyang- Major Opportunity Lost for China
Sep 24 2009
Zhao Ziyang- Major Opportunity Lost for China | Print |  E-mail
Society + Culture
By MWC News   

Translation
Bookmark and Share

ImageZhao Ziyang-- Major Opportunity Lost for China
Discussion Paper prepared by Hon. David Kilgour

The publication this year of Prisoner Of State-The Secret Journal of Chinese Premier Zhao Ziyang  contains important insights into modern China by a leader who for almost 15 years played a key role in the management of its economy. Tienanmen Square events in mid-1989 sidelined Zhao, but party-state governance has probably worsened since and his observations recorded before his death in 2005 are useful to any student of China.
 
From the time of Zhao's house arrest in 1989 until his death, he kept a secret audio journal at his home in Beijing-30 tapes of about one hour's length each-a copy of which was thereafter smuggled out of the country. They constitute an eloquent cri de coeur by an intelligent, reflective leader of integrity and candour, who sought always to do his best  for the Chinese people.
 
Career
 
Zhao's career as a Communist party administrator began in Henan province after the Japanese invaded it in 1937, causing him to leave high school. He made his reputation as a reformer in Guangdong province in the '50s and 60's, becoming at only 46 years of age party chief in Guangdong. He was purged in Mao's Cultural Revolution as a "revisionist", specifically for ending agricultural communes and leasing land to farmers in an attempt to recover from Mao's disastrous 'Great Leap Forward' in which millions starved to death.

By 1971, Zhao was reinstated by the party leadership and two years later rose to become a member of its Central Committee. His next advance was to join the Politburo; only a year after that, he joined its key Standing Committee and at Deng Xiaoping's request later took charge of China's national economy as premier of the State Council.
 
Zhao's patron Deng, by 1986 firmly established as paramount party leader despite being purged twice by Mao, also made him leader of a group invited to propose a political reform package. As acting General Secretary of the Party later, Zhao proposed to separate the party from the government. He told Mikhail Gorbachev in 1989 that the rule of law should replace the rule of party officials and that more transparency was needed. The economy, he argued, needed an independent judiciary.
 
Tienanmen Disaster
 
During 1989, Zhao's immediate hopes for a China with acceptable governance were dashed. In response to the student demonstrations in April against corruption and other issues, Zhao proposed a return to classes, dialogues and punishing only those who had committed crimes. Unfortunately, a few days later, Deng,  then aged 85 and holding only the official position of chair of the Military Commission, condemned the protests to party insiders. When his remarks were circulated by hardliner Li Peng, events at Tienanmen escalated.
 
Zhao nonetheless called for the protesters to be dealt with "based on principles of democracy and law". A week later when Deng decided to impose martial law, Zhao showed enormous courage by telling his mentor that he'd find it difficult to carry out such an order. Two days later, he visited the square and pleaded with the demonstrators to leave, knowing that a brutal assault was imminent.
 
This was in fact his last public appearance as premier. Soon after the massacre of hundreds of students and others in and around Tienanmen Square, Zhao was stripped of all party offices and put under house arrest for 16 years until he died.
 
Three Key Insights
 
Deng
 
Deng Xiaping, the acknowledged paramount leader after Mao's death between 1981 and 1997, is presented as sympathetically as possible by Zhao as his longtime friend and favourite, but overall Deng emerges as deeply flawed. He made Zhao premier and responsible for the economy and was in the process of making him General Secretary of the CCP when Tienanmen events intervened. Deng did support economic liberalisation after the crippling central planning of Mao since 1949, including various initiatives by Zhao in the '70s and '80s, but he opposed the rule of law, multi-party democracy and virtually every principle of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He also unleashed the terrible violence of Tienanmen Square upon his own people and encouraged a small group of like-minded hardliners, Li Peng and Jiang Zemin in particular, in effect to swallow the Party. China and the world would be much better places if Deng had continued to support Zhao.
 
Governance
 
In large part because of Deng's choices during 1989, the party-state of China continues to govern in the mould of some of the most authoritarian regimes of the present and past centuries. The country's constitution remains an empty vessel. Not even the party charter was heeded in its treatment of Zhao. For example, Deng and a few cronies decided at a meeting a Deng's home to remove Zhao as General Secretary of the Party, but under the charter only the Standing Committee of the Politburo could do so. As Zhao notes, two of its five members (including Zhao) were not invited to attend. At a subsequent meeting of the Central Committee to censure Zhao, his statement of defence was not even shown to some of those present. He provides other examples of Cultural Revolution tactics used against the people of China since 1989.
 
Zhao notes that even during the height of the 'class struggles in 1962, Mao did not deprive Marshall Peng Dehuai of his personal freedom over his criticisms, sending him instead to do useful work. Jiang Zemin as  General Secretary claimed  the party would govern according to the rule of law, but much of what happened to Zhao during his eight years as boss was a violation of both the laws of China and the party charter. 
 
Economy
 
Zhao's insights into the reasons for his country's breakneck economic growth after 1978 are also important. In his view, the key elements were allowing direct foreign investment, the creation of special economic zones on the coast, expanded autonomy for enterprises and allowing land to be leased.
 
Here, I offer some personal views, not Zhao's, including my essential concurrence with Peter Navarro, a professor at the University of California, who argues that consumer markets across the world have been “conquered” by China largely through cheating on trade practices. These include export subsidies, widespread counterfeiting and piracy of products, currency manipulation, and environmental, health and safety standards so weakly enforced that they have made China a very dangerous place to work.
 
Navarro says new trade legislation by all of China’s trade partners should achieve fair trade by the following:

  1. All must refrain from illegal export subsidies and currency manipulation and abide by the rules of the World Trade Organisation(WTO);
  2. For currency manipulation, he supports what the bi-partisan US-China Commission has recommended to the American Congress: define it as an illegal export subsidy and add it to other subsidies when calculating anti-dumping and countervail penalties;
  3. Every trade partner must respect intellectual property; adopt and enforce health, safety and environmental regulations consistent with international norms; provide decent wages and working conditions; and ban the use of forced labour;
  4. Adopt a 'zero-tolerance' policy for anyone who sells or distributes pirated or counterfeit goods;
  5. Defective and contaminated food and drugs must be blocked more effectively by measures which make it easier to hold importers liable for selling foreign products that do harm to people or pets;
  6. Despite growing criticism, China's party-state continues to trade its UN Security Council veto for energy, raw materials and access to markets from Angola to Burma to Zimbabwe. Increased monitoring and exposure of China's party-state activities everywhere is important;
  7. To reverse the 'race to the environmental bottom' in China, to require all to compete on a level playing field and to reduce acid rain and smog affecting populations abroad, all bilateral and multilateral trade agreements should henceforth include strong provisions for protection of the natural environment.

Many Canadians allow our respect for the people of China to mute criticism of their government.  When apologists for its party-state insist that the situation for a growing part of the population is getting better, many of us appear willing to overlook bad governance, official violence, growing social inequalities, widespread corruption and chronic nepotism.
 
The Chinese people want the same things as Canadians, including, respect for all, education, to be safe and secure, good jobs, and a sustainable natural environment. Living standards have improved on the coast and in other urban areas in China, but there is a cost. Most Chinese continue to be exploited by the party-state and firms, often owned by or contracted for manufacturing to multinationals, which operate today across their country like 19th century robber barons. This explains partly why the prices of consumer products 'made in China' seem so low—the externalities are borne by workers, their families and the natural environment.
 
Labour Camps

In doing our final report on party-state organ pillaging from Falun Gong practitioners since 2001, David Matas and I visited about a dozen countries to interview adherents sent to China's forced labour camps since 1999, who managed later to leave the camps and the country itself. They told us of working in appalling conditions for up to sixteen hours daily with no pay, little food, being cramped together on the floor for sleeping and being tortured. They made export products, ranging from garments to chopsticks to Christmas decorations as subcontractors to multinational companies. This, of course, constitutes both gross corporate irresponsibility and violations of WTO rules.
 
The labour camps are outside the legal system and allow the party-state to send anyone to them for up to four years with neither hearing nor appeal. There is a link between the involuntary labour done since 1999 by tens of thousands of Falun Gong practitioners and other prisoners in these camps and the resulting loss of manufacturing jobs in Canada and elsewhere. One estimate of the number of the camps across China as of 2005 was 340, having a capacity of about 300,000 inmates. In 2007, a US government report estimated that at least half of the inmates in the camps were Falun Gong.
 
Such grave abuses would not be occurring if the Chinese people enjoyed the rule of law and their government believed in the intrinsic importance of each one of them.  It is the combination of totalitarian governance and 'anything is permitted' economics that allows such practices to persist. Canada and other countries should ban forced labour exports.
 
The attempted crushing of  democracy movements, truthful journalists, Buddhist, Falun Gong, Christian, Muslim and other independent faith groups, human rights lawyers and other legitimate civil society communities in recent years indicates that China's party-state must still be engaged with caution.
 
If its government stops abuses of human rights and takes steps to indicate that it wishes to treat its trade partners in a mutually-beneficial way, the new century will bring harmony for China, its trading partners and neighbours. The Chinese people have the numbers, perseverance, self-discipline, entrepreneurship, intelligence, culture and pride to make this new century better and more peaceful for the entire human family.
 
Conclusion
 
To return to Zhao's important book in closing, the people of China and the entire world can only regret that Deng did not allow his protege to continue leading the party and the government towards the values of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Imagine how much different  China itself and so many countries from Sudan to Burma to Iran might be be if the leader who was so much in tune with the values emerging in numerous authoritarian countries in the '80s and '90s had succeeded. The world must hope that the next Zhao in China will be allowed to succeed.
 

This_Category
Category:: Society + Culture

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 1212

Comments (8)
RSS comments
1. 24-09-2009 22:24
Community Activist
Mr. Kilgour, please check the claims you are presenting as facts. 
 
Falun Gong's organ harvesting allegation has long been discredited: 
 
- Most recently by the Ottawa Citizen:  
 
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=2c15d2f0-f0ab-4da9-991a-23e4094de949&p=3 
 
- Undercover investigation by US State Dept:  
 
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2006&m=April&x=20060416141157uhyggep0.5443231&t=livefeeds/wf-latest.html 
 
http://www.usembassy.it/pdf/other/RL33437.pdf (section CRS-7)  
 
- Undercover investigation by Chinese dissidnet Harry Wu:  
 
http://www.cicus.org/info_eng/artshow.asp?ID=6491  
 
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20060806_1.htm
Guest
chliu528@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">Charles Liu
2. 25-09-2009 08:36
Community Activist
Hi all, Please don't waste your time with Chliu's comments above whose spin parrots the Communist Party line. The Western Standard published the scoop on Charles Liu alias Bobby Fletcher a while ago--posted below. Take a look. 
 
Sowing confusion 
 
By Kevin Steel Å April 9, 2007  
 
Embarrassed by reports of live organ harvesting, China’s sympathizers launch a high-tech disinformation campaign 
 
He posts his messages everywhere under several different names on Internet blogs and discussion groups. He writes letters to the editor anywhere and sends e-mails to anyone–anyone who might take seriously shocking evidence that the Chinese government “harvests” and sells live organs from political prisoners. His main message is that the Falun Gong–the group which first brought evidence of live organ harvesting to light–and the Epoch Times newspaper that broke that story are spreading propaganda against China’s Communist government. And he’s not even Chinese. He is Charles Liu, a 40-year-old Taiwanese-born technology consultant who lives in Issaquah, Wash., and does business in China. 
 
Liu has been so active and so pro-Beijing in his writings that some Falun Gong supporters–in particular Epoch Times reporter Jana Shearer–have accused him of being an agent for the Chinese government, waging a disinformation campaign against them, trying to confuse people, and deliberately wasting everyone’s time. 
 
It’s a charge that upsets Liu, who dismisses it as “a bunch of kooky friends making unfounded accusations. It’s just a bunch of blog BS.” As for why he devotes so much energy to attacking the Falun Gong and the organ harvesting allegations, he says, “My position is that I simply don’t agree with their brand of politics, because I observed their politics turning from anti-Communist party, to anti-China, . . . and recently it’s morphed into this anti-Chinese hysteria and that’s going to be hurting people,” he says. As an Asian-American, he says he decided to speak up. 
 
He doesn’t really explain, when asked, why he started a blog last year called “The Myth of Tiananmen Square Massacre” under the name of Bobby Fletcher (one of his online aliases, which he also uses to comment on the Western Standard’s online blog). On that blog, he pushes the minimal 250 casualty figure that the Chinese government has always maintained died that night in 1989 (more reliable estimates put the figure at at least ten times that). 
 
Liu’s actions mirror disinformation campaigns waged by the Chinese government in the past. Typically, these include the deliberate spreading of false or misleading facts to sow confusion or doubt among the conflicting accounts. The classic example is the Tiananmen Square massacre; the Chinese government has maintained that no one died in the square itself, that there was only pushing and shoving on the streets around the square, resulting in a few military casualties. Overseas, the CCP relies on its United Front Work department, part of the Chinese intelligence service, to propagate its message. During the Cold War, the Soviets employed many overseas flunkies through their Disinformation Department. 
 
Former Canadian MP David Kilgour, who co-authored a report on China’s macabre organ harvesting industry, has received many propaganda e-mails from Liu. For instance, Liu has written repeatedly that a U.S. congressional committee looked into the organ harvesting allegations and found nothing. “[David] Matas and I gave evidence to that subcommittee and got support from both the Republican chairman and the Democratic vice-chair,” says Kilgour. “I just came to the conclusion he was trying to waste my time, and I have other things to do.” 
 
Winnipeg-based human rights lawyer, and Kilgour’s co-author, David Matas, really doesn’t know what to make of Liu. “I don’t know who he is, but what he does is spend a lot of time replicating nonsense to defend the Chinese government,” Matas says. 
 
The only concern Matas has is that Liu seems to know who he and Kilgour met with in the United States to discuss their report. Matas discovered Liu had sent e-mails to politicians–and their staff–prior to the meetings. “The only people who would have that information would potentially be the Chinese government. I can’t imagine how Liu would know we were meeting with those people,” Matas says. “We’re not super-secretive, but you can’t find information on the Internet or in any public place about who we’re meeting with, where and when.” He himself has received at least 10 e-mails from Liu, all of which he’s ignored. Maybe Matas is onto something with that approach. 
 
[This article appeared in the April 9, 2007 issue of the Western Standard.]
Guest
Rhia
3. 25-09-2009 13:48
Community Activist
Personally I have no trouble believing the organ harvesting story. Stealing Falun Gong organs has proven to be a very lucrative trade, with kidneys fetching about $60,000 and livers $130,000. All along the Chinese commies have been into the money. When they were still shooting prisoners who had received the death penalty (which only ended a few years ago or so) they charged the family for the price of the bullet. Now they kill these prisoners in specially equipped vans which are conveniently parked near organ harvesting hospitals so that the organs can be taken as quickly as possible. They have it down to a fine art. Plus they \'legally\' kill more prisoners than the rest of the world put together, according to Amnesty International. But hey, they won\'t miss the money from the bullets now that they have hundreds of thousands of Falun Gong in the jails whose organs they can steal.
Guest
jq3@shaw.caNOSPAM! ">Paula
4. 26-09-2009 07:25
Community Activist
Jana Shearer (Google her name) and her cohorts can make up whatever lies they want about me, the fact is none of the citations came from China. 
 
Read the Kilgour report Appendix 21 Case 1, the photo is an autopsy photo (Y-incison, baseball stitch suture) not evidence of organ harvesting. 
 
The guy’s name is Wang Bin, he was beaten to death in jail. The local authority performed the autopsy, investigated, and arrested the warden. 
 
And here’s the kicker – Falun Gong media reported this story back in 2000, then recycled this story as “organ harvesting” in 2006 to promote their Olympic boycott: 
 
http://clearwisdom.net/emh/articles/2000/11/16/6164.html 
 
See for yourself – David Kilgour did not put any of these claims thru vetting. 
 
David Kilgour has lost any credibility he had when he blindly hopped on the Falun Gong anti-China wagon.
Guest
chliu528@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">Charles Liu
5. 26-09-2009 14:40
Community Activist
Here is Mr. Kilgour's response to Charles Liu's comments. BTW everybody knows that Beijing is covering up this massacre in a big way, so the facts coming from China are undoubtedly fabricated to whitewash this scandal and suit the Communist Party's agenda. There's nothing new there. 
 
5. Charles Liu’s claim: “The gory photo admitted as evidence by Mr. Kilgour is not evidence of vivisection…..” 
 
Our response:  
The issue was well addressed in the Kilgour/Matas revised report as follows: 
http://organharvestinvestigation.net/  
"In the first version of our report, appendix twelve had a photo of a person with stitches after his body was cut open to remove organs. One comment we received back is that the stitches the photos show are consistent with an autopsy. 
“We observe that organs may indeed be removed for autopsies in order to determine the cause of death. A corpse which has been autopsied may well have stitches similar to those shown in the photo. Outside of China, except for organ donors, that is likely the reason why organs would be removed from a corpse. Similarly, outside of China, when people are blood tested, typically, the test is done for their own health. However, the suggestion that Falun Gong practitioners who are tortured to the point of death are blood tested for their health or that practitioners who are tortured to death are autopsied to determine the cause of death belies the torture experience.  
“The corpse whose photo we reproduced was that of Wang Bin. Beatings caused the artery in Mr. Wang's neck and major blood vessels to break. As a result, his tonsils were injured, his lymph nodes were crushed, and several bones were fractured. He had cigarette burns on the backs of his hands and inside his nostrils. There were bruises all over his body. Even though he was already close to death, he was tortured again at night. He finally lost consciousness. On the night of October 4, 2000, Mr. Wang died from his injuries. 
“The purpose of an autopsy report is to determine the cause of death when the cause is otherwise unknown. But in the case of Wang Bin, the cause of death was known before his organs were removed. The suggestion that Wang bin would be autopsied to determine the cause of death after he was tortured to death is not plausible. There was no indication that the family of Wang Bin was asked for consent before the organs of the victim were removed nor provided an autopsy report afterwards. The suggestion of an autopsy is not a tenable explanation for the stitches on Wang Bin's body. "
Guest
Rhia
6. 28-09-2009 10:13
Community Activist
Wang Bin's case was reported by Falun Gong itself back in 2000, Mr. Kilgour: 
 
http://clearwisdom.net/emh/articles/2000/11/16/6164.html  
And the rationale to suggest autopsy was not necessary is insufficient - even if it's evident, an autopsy is necessary to judicate it.
Guest
chliu528@hotmail.comNOSPAM! ">Charles Liu
7. 02-10-2009 03:51
Community Activist
What an unbelievable article. Here this man purports to let us in on a truly amazing publication, a chance to see inside of a closed system, a chance to see the mind of an insightful man and he spends more than half of the article beating his own drum, stumping on his own personal bandwagon. In fact, it's not an article about Zhao Ziyang at all, it's a China bashing and "free Falon Gong" article. China-bashing because at each and every point in the page-long list of what China oughta do--a very George Bush approach to diplomacy--the crime is also the US's, the US oughta do these things. But when you're bashing people, your own sins, your own guilt is denied and set aside as unimportant. A behavior known as denial. Falon Gong? Well, bought and paid for by the CIA, as is the Dalai Lama. Zhao Ziyang's taped diaries were far and away more important and telling and insightful than this blustering blather. This is not journalism, this is not even reporting, it is cheap grandstanding for someone with an ax to grind. The author has abused and minimized Zhao Ziyang into inconsequentiality. More astonishing is that an editor let writing of this nature onto a news website, writing that would not have made it past a HS sophomore teacher. In seven years in China, I never saw such rot out of students. The Honourable David Kilgore was neither honourable with this article nor here.
Guest
8. 15-10-2009 17:21
David Kilgour has it right!
Thank you Mr. Kilgour for this enlightening piece that exposes the horrific human rights situation in China, that should in turn influence our trading habits with this communist regime. I'm sure that anyone that cares about universal human rights and follows the situation in China closely will agree with the few points made by Navarro, highlighted in this paper, on how to achieve fair trade with fairness for the people and the environment. It's about time that China's trading partners start thinking about improving their current legislation and start paying attention to the needs of the Chinese people/citizens instead of using them for mere slave labours and polluting their land and water regardless of the rules. Wake up!
Guest
Rhia

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  David Kilgour Zhao Ziyang Tienanmen Square
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: