Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow Daily arrow Senators Grill Alito
Jan 12 2006
Senators Grill Alito PDF  | Print |  E-mail
By MWC NEWS   
Article Index
Senators Grill Alito
Page 2

Investigating Reports,

Download the NAACP Legal Defense Fund's Report on Samuel Alito (pdf)

Watch The Video

Senators Grill Alito on Membership and Involvement in Discriminatory Group

Focus on the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito. On Wednesday -- during the third day of hearings - Alito's view on abortion remained a key point of debate.

Democrats criticized Alito for not doing something that Chief Justice John Roberts did just four months ago during his confirmation hearings -- state that Roe v. Wade was the settled law of the land.

Alito's membership in the Concerned Alumni of Princeton, or CAP, also drew criticism. In 1985, in a job application to become an assistant attorney general, Alito noted that he was a member of the group along with the Federalist Society. By 1985 the Concerned Alumni of Princeton was already a highly controversial group because it opposed equal educational opportunities for women, minorities and the disabled.

On Tuesday, Alito claimed he had no memory of being involved in the organization even though he mentioned the group on the job application.

On Wednesday, Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy asked Alito more questions about his connection to the group.

  • Sen. Edward Kennedy (D - MA), questioning supreme court nominee Samuel Alito.

Kennedy later criticized Alito, telling reporters outside "He can remember all 67 dissents...in great detail...But he can't remember anything about this organization."

Later during the hearing, Kennedy got into a heated argument with Senate Judiciary Chair Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvanian Republican, after Kennedy claimed that the chairman had failed to honor his request to subpoena records regarding the Concerned Alumni of Princeton.

  • Sen Arlen Specter (R - PA) and Sen. Edward Kennedy (D - MA)

To discuss the significance of Alito's connection with the Concerned Alumni of Princeton as well as other issues raised during the hearings we are joined by two guests:

  • Jamin Raskin, Professor of Constitutional Law at American University's School of Law and author of "Overruling Democracy: The Supreme Court vs. the American People."
  • Ted Shaw, Director-Counsel and President of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. He is scheduled to testify at the Alito hearings today.


JUAN GONZALEZ: On Wednesday, Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy asked Alito more questions about his connection to the group.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: You have no memory of being a member. You graduated from Princeton in 1972, the same year C.A.P. was founded. You call C.A.P. a conservative alumni group. It also published a publication called Prospect, which includes articles by C.A.P. members about the policies that the organization promoted. You're familiar with that?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I don't recall seeing the magazine. I might have seen it at some point.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Did you know they had a magazine?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I've learned of that in recent weeks.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: So in 1983 Prospect essay titled “In Defense of Elitism” stated, quote, "People nowadays just don't seem to know their place. Everywhere one turns Blacks and Hispanics are demanding jobs simply because they're Black and Hispanic. The physically handicap are trying to gain equal representation in professional sports, and homosexuals are demanding that government vouchsafe them the right to bear children." Did you read that, that article?

    SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: Finish the last line.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Finish the last line -- is, "and homosexuals are –”

    SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: No. "And now, here come women."

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: If the senator would let me just --

    SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: Yes, I will.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Can I get two more minutes from my friend perhaps? Just to continue along -- I apologize, Judge -- did you read this article?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I feel confident that I didn't. If I -- if that -- I’m not familiar with the article. And I don't know the context in which those things were said. But they are antithetical to --

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: But could you think of any context that they could be --

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: It’s hard to imagine. If that's what anybody was endorsing, I disagree with all of that. I would never endorse it. I never have endorsed it. Had I thought that that's what this organization stood for, I would never associate myself with it in any way.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: The June ‘84 edition of Prospect magazine contains a short article on AIDS. I know that we've come a long way since then in our understanding of the disease, but even for that time the insensitivity of statements in this article are breathtaking. It announces that a team of doctors has found that AIDS virus in the rhesus monkeys was similar to the virus occurring in human beings. The article then goes on with this terrible statement: "Now the scientists must find humans, or rather homosexuals, to submit themselves to experimental treatment. Perhaps the gay Princeton’s Gay Alliance may want to hold an election." You didn't read that article?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I feel confident that I didn't, Senator, because I would not have anything to do with statements of that nature.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: In 1973, a year after you graduated and during your first year at Yale Law School, former senator, Bill Bradley, very publicly disassociated himself with C.A.P. because of its rightwing views and unsupported allegations about the university. His letter of resignation was published in the Prospect, garnered much attention on campus and among the alumni. Were you aware at the time of that at the time you listed the organization in your application?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I don't think I was aware of that until recent weeks, when I was informed of it.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: And in 1974, an alumni panel, including now Senator Frist, unanimously concluded that C.A.P. had presented a distorted, narrow, hostile view of the university. Were you aware of that at the time of the job application?

    JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO: I was not aware of that until very recently.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Supreme Court nominee, Samuel Alito, being questioned by Senator Ted Kennedy. Kennedy later criticized Alito, telling reporters outside, quote, "He can remember all 67 dissents in great detail, but he can't remember anything about this organization." Later, during the hearing, Kennedy got into a heated argument with the Senate Judiciary Chair, Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican, after Kennedy claimed the Chair had failed to honor his request to subpoena records regarding the Concerned Alumni of Princeton.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Mr. Chairman, if I could have your attention. I think we ought to vote on issuing a subpoena to the custodian of those C.A.P. records. And I want to do that at an appropriate time. I move that the committee go into executive session for the purpose of voting on the issue and seeing -- the sole purpose for issuing the subpoena of those records.

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Well, we'll consider that, Senator Kennedy. There are many, many requests, which are coming to me in many quarters. And, quite candidly, I view the request if it's really a matter of importance. You and I see each other all the time. You've never mentioned it to me. And I do not ascribe a great deal of weight. We actually didn't get a letter, but --

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: You did get a letter. Are you saying?

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Now, wait a minute. You don't know what I got. I’m about to tell you.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Of course, I do, Senator, since I sent it. I’ve got it right here.

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Well, the senator doesn't necessarily know what the recipient gets, Senator Kennedy.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: I've got it right here.

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: You are not in a position to say what I receive. If you'll bare with me for just one minute.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: But I am in a position to say what I sent to you on December 22. So I renew my --

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: You're in a position to tell me what you sent.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: I renew my request, Senator. And if I’m going to be denied, then I’d ask – I’d appeal the decision of the Chair. I think we are entitled to this information. It deals with the fundamental issues of equality and discrimination. This nominee has indicated he has no objection to us seeing these issues. We've gone over the questions. And we are entitled to get that kind of information. And if you're going to rule it out of order, I want to have a vote on that here on our committee.

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Well, don't be premature, Senator Kennedy. I’m not about to make a ruling on this state of the record. I hope you won't mind if I consider it, and I hope you won't mind if I give you the specifics that there was no letter, which I received. I take umbrage at your telling me what I received. I don't mind your telling me what you mailed. But there is a big difference between what's mailed and what's received, and you know that. We're going to move on now. Senator Grassley?

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Well, Mr. Chairman, I’d appeal the ruling of the Chair on this.

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: There's been no ruling of the Chair, Senator Kennedy.

    SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Well, what is the -- my request is that we go into the executive session for the sole purpose of voting on a subpoena for these records that are held over at the Library of Congress, that purpose and that purpose only. And if I’m going to be denied that, I’d want to give notice to the Chair that you're going to have it again and again and again. And we're going to have votes of this committee again and again and again, until we have a resolution. I think it’s --

    SEN. ARLEN SPECTER: Well, Senator Kennedy, I’m not concerned about your threats to have votes again, again, and again. And I’m the Chairman of this committee, and I have heard your request, and I will consider it. And I’m not going to have you run this committee and decide when we're going to go into executive session. We're in the middle of a round of hearings. This is the first time you have personally called it to my attention. And this is the first time that I have focused on it. And I will consider it in due course.



 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: