Home arrow Commentary arrow OPINIONS arrow op-ed arrow Sally Mae and the Student Loan Swindle
May 14 2006
Sally Mae and the Student Loan Swindle | Print |  E-mail
Op_ed
By Ralph Nader   

Privatize the Profits, Socialize the Costs
By RALPH NADER

Al Lord is thinking about building his own private golf course. Not bad for an ex-corporate socialist. The former CEO of Sallie Mae is worth about a quarter of a billion dollars, running a company that Uncle Sam virtually guarantees against any losses while it makes enormous profits in the college student loan business.

In 2003 Mr. Lord told a public audience that "it would be very hard for me to tell you that what I make is not a lot of money." But the company he ran has been making it very hard for tens of thousands of students and blocking any reforms in Congress that would make his company less hard on American taxpayers.

Last year, citing George W. Bush's own budget office, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) declared that, "We waste billions of dollars in corporate welfare every year on student loans, and we cannot afford it any longer."

Sallie Mae lobbyists have heard this before from Democrats and some Republicans, such as Representative Thomas Petri (R-Wisconsin). They are not worried. Sallie Mae executives own the majority leader in the House of Representatives, John Boehner (R-Indiana). He has been wined and dined with over $200,000 in campaign contributions to his PAC from individuals affiliated with the private student-loan industry in the 2003-2004 election cycle.

In December 2005, Mr. Boehner reassured a group of Sallie Mae types who wanted reassurance that their cushy deals would continue: "Know that I have all of you in my two trusted hands."

And what a cushy deal it is. Your federal government guarantees returns for these companies on student loans of at least 2.34 percent higher than the rates paid on commercial loans. At least. If the student borrower defaults, you the taxpayer picks up the tab for Sallie Mae and the banks.

If the student falls on very hard times after graduation and has to go bankrupt, federal law says bankruptcy does not affect collection of student loans. Even the powerful credit card industry can't get past bankruptcy to garnish what's left of the graduate's assets. The student lending industry can even get to a debtor's disability insurance payments under social security.

In February Congress did act on student loans in another way--backward. It cut $12 billion out of the student loan programs, mostly from students and parents. In a report just out, the California Public Interest Research Group (CALPIRG) found that in California, 17.9% of public college students and 28.8% of private college graduates have unmanageable student loan debt were they to take jobs as teachers or social workers. Yet these critical careers desperately need college graduates to replenish their ranks. (To download the full report, go to http://www.calpirg.org. See also http://www.studentloanjustice.org.)

Last Sunday, May 7th, I turned on CBS' 60 Minutes which unloaded on Sallie Mae in a devastating segment about its power, greed and profits.

Originally a government-sponsored enterprise like Fannie Mae, Sallie Mae was privatized in 1997 and is now the largest private lender to students. But not entirely private. The federal government is its guarantor. Michael Dannenberg of the New America Foundation told Leslie Stahl:

"It may be called 'private'but it's not private at all. Frankly it's a socialist-like system. It's not as if this private entity is assuming any risks. No, no, no. The law makes sure that this so-called private entity has virtually no risk."

Corporate socialism--an Uncle Sam (meaning you) guarantee--has been very good for Sallie Mae's stock, which has gone up twenty-fold since 1995, when it was already a mature, profitable company. 

It gets worse. Let's say a graduated student defaults. The government pays Sallie Mae both the principal and the interest compounded. But the loan is still subject to collection. Guess who owns some of the largest collection agencies--you guessed it, Sallie Mae. When its collection agency collects, it gets 25% of the recovery. The profits go to Sallie Mae.

The corporate lawyers who conceived this self-enriching system ought to get the nation's top prize for shameless perversity.

Corporate socialism--an Uncle Sam (meaning you) guarantee--has been very good for Sallie Mae's stock, which has gone up twenty-fold since 1995, when it was already a mature, profitable company.

Ms. Stahl interviewed one graduate, Lynnae Brown, who borrowed $60,000 starting in college in 1985. She has been ill since her sophomore year. She keeps paying to avoid default, but by the time she is finished, she will have paid Sallie Mae $262,383. Now one can sense why Al Lord can build his private golf course.

The bright and compassionate Harvard Law School professor, Elizabeth Warren, told Ms. Stahl that "Sallie Mae makes money if you pay back on time. And Sallie Mae makes money if you don't pay back on time. It shouldn't be the case that Sallie Mae gets to play every hand at the poker table while the government is the one that keeps anteing up the money."

But the solution is plain. The government's Department of Education offers student loans directly, bypassing the middleman. It gives the loan money to Ohio State University, for example, which then loans it to students. Direct lending by Uncle Sam is far cheaper. It will cost taxpayers less than 1 cent on the dollar, while Sallie Mae guaranteed loans will cost taxpayers 12 cents on the dollars. Who made these projections? Mr. Bush's own budget analysts.

I have observed previously that our weakened, disorganized democracy is increasingly both exposé-proof and solution-proof. Nonetheless, the solution is for the government to stop allowing companies special advantages like Sallie Mae kickbacks to universities in order to get the student business, as 60 Minutes pointed out. Then more direct Department of Education lending can save taxpayers money and provide more loans for hardpressed students and parents.

Was there any uproar after the 60 Minutes criticism? If so, I didn't hear it either from Congress or anywhere else. Well, at least Sallie Mae was affected; its stock went up the next day on Monday $1.70, to $53.85!

Recommend this article...




Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Blogmarks!Yahoo!

Quote this article on your site | Views: 3223

Comments (4)
RSS comments
1. 30-12-2008 14:21
When discounts and special benefits were offered by competing lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), it made sense for taxpayers to to subsidize this model. But, when these subsidies were cut last year, lenders left (even before the current crisis) the student loan business. It just was not as profitable for them anymore. And benefits were no longer passed along to students by the ones who remained. 
 
Now, there is no benefit and quite a few drawbacks to borrowing under the FFELP. Schools should opt to move to the Direct Loan program, before this becomes a deciding factor in students' decision about which college to attend. 
 
Direct federal student loan program
Guest
vicki@collegeloanconsultant.comNOSPAM! ">collegeloanconsultant
2. 30-12-2008 17:10
Restore consumer protections on Student
I agree with Mr. Nader, and its not just Sallie Mae. Since congress removed all consumer protections after it FAILED to provide proper oversight to the US Dept of Education, who failed to properly regulate the schools who participated in student loans in the 1970s and 1980s which resulted in the highest default rates in history, the government became an oppressor of freedom, and not a champion of it.  
Even their own congressional record shows they know that the schools sold useless educations and the loan companies are just as guilty. Sallie Mae has been caught defaulting students without even trying to collect on the loans before doing so.  
 
All in all it results in the same thing - the lives of students whose only guilty act was to try to better themselves, get put into a state of perpetual indebtedness with now way out save death.
Guest
macwildstar@yahoo.comNOSPAM! ">Mac Wildstar
3. 31-12-2008 05:24
Restore consumer protections on Student
Ah, yes, we should start taking the advice from the man whose ego is so huge he caused Al Gore the election and gave us 8 years of George W. Bush. 
 
Can't trust the Department of Education to regulate lenders??? Then how can you trust the Department to be the ONLY student loan lender--i.e., give them a MONOPOLY. 
 
Ralph Nader used to be pro-competition, pro-consumer.
Guest
alexhamilton89@aol.comNOSPAM! ">Alex Hamilton
4. 31-12-2008 05:39
Restore consumer protections on Student
Ralph writes, "The corporate lawyers who conceived this self-enriching system ought to get the nation's top prize for shameless perversity." 
 
Corporate lawyers?!?!  
 
It was President Lyndon Johnson. he proposed college grants and guaranteed student loans in his Great Society address to Congress.
Guest
starrjor@aol.comNOSPAM! ">David Starr

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4


Tags:  RALPH NADER Op_ed Sally Mae and the Student Loan Swindle
 
< Prev Content   Next Content >
 

Translate

Enter Amount: