Hired guns aim to confuse
By David Suzuki

Al Gore once told me that to get politicians to listen, you have to engage the people first. The former vice president is attempting to do just that this summer with his critically acclaimed global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth." But he's up against some pretty powerful opponents.

His movie, by most standards, is pretty good. Rotten Tomatoes, a website that compiles movie reviews from newspapers, television and the internet, shows that 92 per cent of critics liked it. A story by the Associated Press on experts who critiqued the science behind the movie found that they too gave it a thumbs up for accuracy. Personally, I thought it was brilliant.

But shortly after the Associated Press article came out, other articles started popping up that said Mr. Gore's science was shoddy. People claiming to be experts wrote opinion pieces in newspapers decrying the film, Mr. Gore, and the "theory" of global warming in general. Contrarians, it seemed, were coming out of the woodwork. What happened?

What happened was a well-funded campaign to discredit the film and carpet bomb North Americans with confusing and contradictory information about the science of global warming. It appears to be having an effect too. Recent polls I've seen indicate that while the public is very concerned about climate change, they are still confused about the science.

Those who read science journals probably find this public confusion, well, confusing. While there is plenty of discussion in scientific circles about what precisely a changing climate will mean to people in various parts of the world, there is no debate about the cause of global warming (human activities, mostly burning oil, coal and gas), or about the fact that it is already having an effect and that those effects will become more and more pronounced in coming years.

Yet, there they are in the editorial and opinion pages, supposed experts writing about the grand global warming conspiracy perpetuated by Europeans. Or socialists. Or European socialists. Those in the know can laugh off such nonsense. But the problem is, most people aren't in the know. Average citizens are busy people and they are not experts in climate science, so naturally they tend to defer to people who appear to know what they're talking about.

Unfortunately, masquerading as an expert in the media is pretty easy. All you need are a few letters after your name and a controversial story to tell. That makes news. And there's no shortage of public relations people willing to spin a good tale - usually for a tidy profit. Companies pay big bucks to have these spin doctors work their magic and make sure the industry line gets heard.

But even some of public relations' best-known spin doctors are disgusted by what's going on right now over global warming. Jim Hoggan is one. He's a personal friend who happens to be president of one of western Canada's largest public relations firms, James Hoggan and Associates. And he's so appalled at what he says is deliberate manipulation of public opinion about this issue that he's started a website called desmogblog.com to debunk the global warming skeptics.

Jim writes in his blog: "There is a line between public relations and propaganda - or there should be. And there is a difference between using your skills, in good faith, to help rescue a battered reputation and using them to twist the truth - to sow confusion and doubt on an issue that is critical to human survival. And it is infuriating - as a public relations professional - to watch my colleagues use their skills, their training and their considerable intellect to poison the international debate on climate change."

Well said, Jim. His blog makes fascinating reading. It names names and follows the money trail - often leading back to big U.S. conservative organizations and fossil fuel giants. Jim's making it his mission to expose the liars and the frauds and he's doing a pretty good job.

Al Gore was right, the people do have to be engaged before politicians will listen. But engaging the people sometimes requires clearing the air first.

Described as “one of the world’s most effective popularizers of science, alongside Carl Sagan and Jacques Cousteau,” Suzuki has considerable charm and intelligence. His social consciousness is as sharp as his piercing eyes. Jerry Bruckley observed in International Wildlife, “He’s passionate, driven, irreverent, brilliant, charismatic, and controversial, and usually in the same sentence.

Recommend this article...

Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:

Comments (1)

1. 22-07-2006 07:52

Rush to save the earth?

Some time ago I was listening to Rush Limbaugh when he made an observation that absolutely floored me. During one of the hurricanes, Rush was watching weather footage on Fox TV while he was broadcasting his radio program. Between calls he paused to say that watching the live hurricane footage, he was truly awed by the tremendous power of nature. \"How can anyone think that anything we puny humans can do can have any impact on anything so vast as world climate.\" He said that he could not see how driving an SUV could possibly impact something as powerful and vast as the earth\'s climate. \"It\'s absurd for we puny humans to think we are that powerful.\"  
 
I wish I had a tape of the comments. I still find it hard to believe that someone could so not get it.  
 
Let me digress a minute so I can explain why I listen to Rush from time to time. First of all, I often in spite all the bombast, find him really funny. I get the feeling that he is like a big kid that likes to stir things up. Getting a rise out of people is often more important for him than actually saying something of substance. Most of the time, I don\'t think he really believes himself all that much. I just think he has found a lucrative market and he is exploiting it for all it is worth. I think most people with an IQ at 65 or below actually believe him. They even call themselves \"Ditto Heads.\" His program is to serious political/social analysis what “professional “ Wrestling is to the NFL. Occasionally I can find choice tidbits that have slipped through the alternative press. Also I’m sure the Administration trial balloons certain of their hair-brained policies through the various hate-shows like Limbaugh, Hannity, Michael Savage, etc to see how they will play in the Bible Belt. 
 
When Rush made the hurricane comment I didn’t sense the pundit/wise-guy in him. I sensed a deeply awed heartfelt emotion breaking through. I sensed that here was a truly felt, real conviction coming out. I was at once deeply moved and appalled. I had never really pitied him before. It was as if I were looking at a horribly deformed person who was completely unaware of his deformity. Would someone have the heart to point out such a handicap? Then I thought of myself. What are the things I don’t know that I don’t know? I don’t recycle. I probably use twice a month’s energy of a poor Indian village every day. I need to recycle the beam in my own eye… 
 
Bob Boldt 
 
 

Guest

bboldt2@netzero.netNOSPAM! ">bboldt2

Write Comment

Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:
Comment:
Code:*
	I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4